a) choosing to not play within reality (perceivable) tempts one to be played through fiction (suggested).
b) each mind/memory implies a setting within motion; hence being able to receive input...choosing to hold onto suggested input (information) tempts one to ignore letting go of perceivable input (inspiration).
The more one holds onto; the less compatible one becomes within a moving system.
c) plain (inception towards death) generates expression (life)...suggesting explanations to others tempts them to repress self under others; while ignoring to express self.
defined by their worldview
a) DEFINE, verb (Latin; to end, to limit, from finis, end.)...does that sound like a world viewed through the eyes of life?
b) adapting to perceivable sound implies PHONETICIANS (from phonics; sound); while ignoring it for suggested definitions (words) represents DEAF PHONETICIANS.
In other words...if one consents to be limited by definitions from others; then one willingly limits ones life.
c) one views a world of perceivable sound...others slap suggested words onto it to tempt one to limit self by ignoring sound. These words/brands/labels/idols are being attached within ones mind/memory by ones consent to hold onto them...
understood as a “spirit”
SPIRIT (Latin spiro; to breathe) implies ones adaptation to being moved aka resistance (exhale) within velocity (inhale)...consenting to "stand under" (understand) the suggestions of others tempts one to ignore resisting, hence all the NPC order followers.
In short...understanding implies repression; spirit implies expression.
I am not saying the woke/ NPC people are the “spirit” etc but rather that they are like the vessels by which it images itself into the world
Vessel (life) within motion (inception towards death) implies adaptation (spirit)...motion generates living reactions; hence animating the breath of life.
collective consciousness
Nature sets itself apart; hence from whole (perceivable) into each partial (perceiving)...others suggest collectivism to tempt partials to hold onto each other (commune-ism; social-ism; global-ism; multicultural-ism etc.)
Being conscious implies ones awareness of other ones (moving differences)...this allows one to grow self discernment as partial (different) within momentum of whole (same). It's the momentum of motion which differentiates partials (temporary growth) within whole (ongoing loss).
Momentum divides center (life) from surrounding (inception towards death)...
I’m trying to get at the root of the ideas themselves...
The issue with that....idealism is being suggested by others; hence your struggle to "understand" what others are suggesting. What this behavior tempts you to ignore is being seed (perceiving) within soil (perceivable); able to grow roots of comprehension...which requires you to resist the suggestions by others.
expressed itself against the “Christian” culture
a) consenting to suggested LOGOS (word) tempts one into LOGIC aka a conflict of reason over suggested. That represents the foundation for ones mind set "against" others.
b) perceivable communicates implication (if/then); suggested tempts one into reason (want vs not want; true vs false; belief vs disbelief; good vs evil; us vs them; coke vs pepsi etc.).
a) choosing to not play within reality (perceivable) tempts one to be played through fiction (suggested).
b) each mind/memory implies a setting within motion; hence being able to receive input...choosing to hold onto suggested input (information) tempts one to ignore letting go of perceivable input (inspiration).
The more one holds onto; the less compatible one becomes within a moving system.
c) plain (inception towards death) generates expression (life)...suggesting explanations to others tempts them to repress self under others; while ignoring to express self.
a) DEFINE, verb (Latin; to end, to limit, from finis, end.)...does that sound like a world viewed through the eyes of life?
b) adapting to perceivable sound implies PHONETICIANS (from phonics; sound); while ignoring it for suggested definitions (words) represents DEAF PHONETICIANS.
In other words...if one consents to be limited by definitions from others; then one willingly limits ones life.
c) one views a world of perceivable sound...others slap suggested words onto it to tempt one to limit self by ignoring sound. These words/brands/labels/idols are being attached within ones mind/memory by ones consent to hold onto them...
SPIRIT (Latin spiro; to breathe) implies ones adaptation to being moved aka resistance (exhale) within velocity (inhale)...consenting to "stand under" (understand) the suggestions of others tempts one to ignore resisting, hence all the NPC order followers.
In short...understanding implies repression; spirit implies expression.
Vessel (life) within motion (inception towards death) implies adaptation (spirit)...motion generates living reactions; hence animating the breath of life.
Nature sets itself apart; hence from whole (perceivable) into each partial (perceiving)...others suggest collectivism to tempt partials to hold onto each other (commune-ism; social-ism; global-ism; multicultural-ism etc.)
Being conscious implies ones awareness of other ones (moving differences)...this allows one to grow self discernment as partial (different) within momentum of whole (same). It's the momentum of motion which differentiates partials (temporary growth) within whole (ongoing loss).
Momentum divides center (life) from surrounding (inception towards death)...
The issue with that....idealism is being suggested by others; hence your struggle to "understand" what others are suggesting. What this behavior tempts you to ignore is being seed (perceiving) within soil (perceivable); able to grow roots of comprehension...which requires you to resist the suggestions by others.
a) consenting to suggested LOGOS (word) tempts one into LOGIC aka a conflict of reason over suggested. That represents the foundation for ones mind set "against" others.
b) perceivable communicates implication (if/then); suggested tempts one into reason (want vs not want; true vs false; belief vs disbelief; good vs evil; us vs them; coke vs pepsi etc.).