How tf did this guy win?
SEAN (Irish form of John) aka Latin Joannes aka Greek Ioannes aka Hebrew Yohanan - "Jehovah has favored" the STRICKEN (struck; smitten; far gone) LAND of the free.
one must go deep
Each one (alive) must rise (inception) within fall (death)...a deep (ignorance) or shallow (comprehension) journey shaped by each ones free will of choice.
layers/levels of subterfuge
A mason lays layers/levels of suggested information into ones consenting mind; if one chooses to evade perceivable (inspiration) for concealing ones mind with suggested (information)...a self imposed subterfuge.
A mason of free (will of choice) utilizes suggested information as bricks, and ones consent as mortar to build walls of ignorance within ones mind/memory, layered like pyramids with individual nadirs (foundations) of ignorance, and a common apex of freshly consented to information.
10
1 (perceivable being; oneself) 0 (suggested nihilism; nothing)
principle of initiation
- PRIN'CIPLE, noun (Latin principium) - "beginning" + INITIA'TION, noun (Latin initiatio) - "process of introducing one into"
Flow introduces form (life) from beginning (inception) towards end (death). As form within flow; self discernment represents the backbone (spine) of sustenance within animation aka growth (vertical) within loss (horizontal)...vertical aka vertebrae (33) within spinal column.
- FREE...being free will of choice
- ACCEPTED...others consenting (by free will of choice) to ones suggestion (by free will of choice), hence others making one a "chosen one".
- G...generative aka reactor (life) within generator (inception towards death).
a) lower right corner: copyright designed by...design implies "delineation of form as representation of".
b) oldest so called religion suggested? Animism aka animation aka flow (inception towards death) which delineates representative form (life) within itself.
Now...who gave others the "right to copy" form within flow? Well...ones consent to suggested -ISMS.
In short...ones consent permits others to design suggested information (form) within perceivable inspiration (flow). Others utilize ones ignorance as the soil and ones consent as the seed to grow the "evolutionary tree of religion".
abroad
Others suggest abroad (not confined to narrow limits) as the inversion of being choice within balance (need/want), hence as narrow as the eye (I) of a needle (need).
foreign way of doing things
Way (inception towards death) represents domestic (dominance of balance) for local (ones choice) and foreign (choice of others).
doing things different
Same (inception towards death) does things (life) differently.
to bring...growth forward, for their own benefit
Growing implies resisting (life) forwards motion (inception towards death)...others suggest progressivism (benefit aka advantage aka advance) to distract one from resisting.
BOOM, verb - "in marine language, to rush with violence, as a ship under a press of sail"
A ship (life) under press of sail (inception towards death) needs to resist rapidly driving forwards (rush)...others suggest HARBOR (a place of entertainment and rest) to lure ones ship to ignore the ongoing motion aka no rest for the wicked (departed).
I know we're so fucked
Knowing to be (living) fucked (within process of dying) implies ones opportunity to grow within loss until then...others suggest pluralism (we) to tempt the growing singular (one) to feel overwhelmed by all the loss in ones circumference.
will not stop
Motion (inception towards death) generates will (life)...consenting to suggested nihilism (not) tempts one to ignore motion (stop).
CRIME (to separate)
Being (alive) implies separated from one another within natural order (inception towards death).
Natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater) implies CRIME (separation)...others suggest law vs crime to distract one from that.
SUSPENSE - "to attach to something above"
Attaching oneself by consent to suggestions; places others above and self below.
ISSUE, noun - "act of passing or flowing out"
Flow (inception towards death) passes form (life). Being implies issued within natural order....others suggest orders to distract one from that.
What happened with local + around
Sustain local (perception) by resisting circumference (suggestion) or damage local by consenting to circumference.
at my uni
Aka local (my) consenting to circumference (uni), hence now being surrounded by slaves (voluntary) of masters (government).
a doctrine know as transubstantiation
Ones reaction represents transmuted substance within action (-tion)...reacting to a suggested doctrine tempts one to ignore that.
occult...cannibal
Hidden (occult) in plain sight...CANNI (Latin canis; dog) BAL (baal) aka god baal. Furthermore; Hebrew Ba'al - "owner, master, lord" implies master of dog.
Believing (want) or disbelieving (not want) implies consenting to the suggestions of others, while ignoring perceivable (need)...the so called jews suggest everyone else what to believe, which shapes a conflict of reason (belief vs disbelief) among non-jews; while giving jews consensual permission to control both sides of every conflict.
What one believes or disbelieves is irrelevant to the trade (consent to suggested) underneath, it's a mere sales-pitch to distract the consumer from the happy merchant.
As for poisoning wells...inception towards death issues forth (well) life. Ignoring perceivable (reality) for suggested (fiction) corrupts (poison) self; while permitting others to utilize suggestion as venom and consent as vector to poison ones well-being.
coming full circle to MY point
What does end of sentence (point) represent within a circle?
Every statement can be seen as conflict or as confluence.
Conflict implies reasoning over affixed definitions upheld; confluence (flowing together) happens while one holds onto affixed form. Being implies IN (being within) FLUENCE (as form within flow).
Others suggest CON; noun (negation) and ones consent permits others CON; adjective (swindling).
Choices
Aka suggested pluralism (choices) over perceivable singularity (free will of choice). If one views surrounding as choices; then one willingly ignores ones centered choice.
you got some gems of knowledge and insight in there
Knowledge (perceivable inspiration) is everywhere...you close yourself off to it when trying to look inside/insight others for suggested information.
What you view as gems isn't what I offer; but to what you allow yourself to open up to. You're in control over adapting to perceivable or consenting to suggested; but if you choose suggested; then you give control to those suggesting it.
i never how to respond
As free will of choice...not to the suggested choices by others. I chose "free-will-of-choice" to make it harder for others to ignore oneself. Considering how to respond to "free-will-of-choice" implies utilizing ones free will of choice. The contradiction should be obvious...alas ignorance is bliss.
Instead of finding something to reason (agree vs disagree; like vs dislike; want vs not want; belief vs disbelief etc.) over...try to apply implication (if/then) to any "gem" standing out to you. This way one doesn't need to trade (question for answer) with others; but draws from solution (inception towards death) as self (life)...which is how one sustains self.
Nature implies balance (momentum of motion)...anyone within responds as choice. Others cannot grow self discernment for one-self. As in...no answer from me could give you self discernment.
A chosen one simply distracts other ones from being choice within balance...and choosing to consent to what others are suggesting sustains the distraction (ignorance) within self.
a person from another world to me.
Per sonos (by sound)...that's the same world each different instrument lives in. Others suggest definitions for "world" to distract one from that.
This world...broken...could never put...back together
That represents the suggested inversion of this world breaking (inception) and putting itself back together (death), as to establish partials (growth) within whole (loss).
Alchemy...whole to partial (inception); partial within whole (life) and partial to whole (death) aka ingredient out of base transmutation.
heading towards collapse
One can only be develop (living) within collapse (process of dying)...others suggest progressivism (heading towards) to tempt one to ignore that resisting develops resistance within velocity of collapse.
what happen to problems? They get solved
What happens to problems (life)? They get solved (inception towards death)...others suggest "math" to tempt one to solve problems by seeking solutions.
Powers That Be
Being (growth) implies empowered within (loss).
They are interjecting
Being implies partial (perception) within whole (perceivable)...others interject suggestions to tempt partial to ignore whole.
they are moving...
Inception towards death (whole) moves life (partial)...being alive implies RE (response to) MOVE (being moved by). Others utilize suggestions to direct one to follow along, while ignoring to respond to (living) being moved by (process of dying).
avoid population collapse
a) POPULOUS (the whole number of people) TION (action)...being implies reaction of each one person (aka each partial) within whole action.
NUMBER (designation of a unit) + UNIT (Latin unus; one) implies each one person (Latin per sonos; by sound) aka each partial unit within whole sound.
b) Ones consent to the suggestions by others represents "a-void" aka Latin viduus, divido - "a division; emptiness; nothingness"
Everything is managed
By ones consent to ignore everything (perceivable inspiration) for permitting others to define; redefine; contradict and hence manage "nothing" (suggested information).
Nature implies fluid generator (loss) of solid reactors (growth)...others slap labels like "tree" on a solid within fluid to gain control over all those who consent to hold onto the suggested label.
If this then that
If/then (implication) implies motion as foundation. This and That represent definite adjectives, hence tempting one to define (affix) this or that as such (alike).
The more one chooses to define alike; the less one comprehends about being different (life) within sameness (inception towards death).
If that, this not this. if not this, then not that. If not that, then this.
All this represents misuse of implication (if/then) after consenting to suggested nihilism (not), hence putting self into a conflict of reason...
If half right, then half wrong.
...right versus wrong reasoning over suggested, while ignoring perceivable.
In short: instead of "if nothing; then nothing else" try "if everything; then each thing within"...
net zero
Ones consent to the suggestions by others binds (net) oneself to nothing (zero)...while ignoring everything perceivable.
change denier
Ignoring perceivable (moving inspiration) for suggested (held on information) implies "change denial".
"The Paris Agreement underlines the need for net zero."
Agreement (ones consent to the suggestions by others) underlines (suggested under the perceivable line) the need (perceivable) for net (binding self) zero (to suggested).
PAR (equality in value or circumstances) IS (essence), hence equal essence (inception towards death) for each diverse substance (life) within.
mistakes inherent in language itself
Like explaining something (numbers and letters) within everything (whole) while using nothing (not) to do so? One chose to take suggested "not"; hence missing everything aka miss-take.
If one takes (suggested); then one misses (perceivable)...free will of choice.
minus one
Energy minus one equals? Can there be less energy inside whole energy?
they divide by choosing one side of the definition.
aka reasoning (wanting vs not wanting suggested).
DE-fining the spirit AS word will be shown to have mistakes inherent in language itself.
Hence me utilizing breathing; adaptation; reaction to enacting; free will of choice in-between balance etc.
It's using THE spirit that tempts others to hold onto suggested the-ism, and then spiritualism and so on.
Remembering the source makes them return to 'wholesomeness'.
Remembering tempts one to ignore being (life) in-between departure (inception) and return (death), hence apartheid resisting wholeness to sustain self.
after parsing all those words
a) before pars (partial) exists whole.
b) only within all sound can each one word be shaped.
b) being (life) implies in-between before (inception) and after (death).
'two' sides of every definition
Two contradicts "definite", since it implies more than one.
splitting
The splitting of suggested words into contradicting definitions; tempts one to ignore that perceivable sound was split into each suggestible word by the person (per sonos; by sound) suggesting it.
I write about the whole (sound) others ignore for split partials (words).
always half...
Half contradicts ALL way. Internal doesn't represent half of external, but partial within whole. Each "one" partial is part of whole "oneness". Ones ignorance of self for suggested dualism is why the spell H'ALF, (one equal part of a thing) works.
There cannot be one partial equal to another partial; because each partial implies a different position within whole.
no need to execute
EX'ECUTE (to carry into complete effect)...complete cause (inception towards death) carries partial effects (life). One needs to resist that.
without consent
-IST (scientist) implies ones consent to suggested -ISM (scientism).
in an ideal world
Ideal (suggested) can only be shaped within practical (perceivable)...others suggest idealism to distract one from that.
Ideal (words) implies practical (sound)...consenting to former tempts one to ignore latter.
can you explain...provide
Inception towards death (plain loss) provides life (ex-pressed growth).
what surrounds
Sound (whole) surrounds center (partials).
map
Being interior center (life) within exterior surrounding (inception towards death) implies "representation of surface" aka map.
a) UNI (one) VERSE (to turn)...perceivable sound directs one; suggested words turn one against (Latin versus) one another.
b) instruction aka structure (life) within action (inception towards death)...if another suggests "instruct", then ones consent implies self "destruct".
c) if one submits to others; then one ignores taking care of self, which contradicts being a care-taker (nurse) to others.
d) CARE (Old English caru, cearu) - "sorrow, anxiety, grief, burdens of mind"...that's the care one takes on when consenting to suggested nurses.
a) exoteric (perceivable inspiration) or esoteric (suggested information)...consenting to esoteric (words) tempts one to ignore exoteric (sound).
b) truth vs lie (reasoning about esoteric) tempts one to ignore if/then (implication of exoteric).
a) that those (life) within change (inception towards death) can define (affix) truth.
b) that partials (ones) within whole (oneness) can perceive dualism (two).