you got some gems of knowledge and insight in there
Knowledge (perceivable inspiration) is everywhere...you close yourself off to it when trying to look inside/insight others for suggested information.
What you view as gems isn't what I offer; but to what you allow yourself to open up to. You're in control over adapting to perceivable or consenting to suggested; but if you choose suggested; then you give control to those suggesting it.
i never how to respond
As free will of choice...not to the suggested choices by others. I chose "free-will-of-choice" to make it harder for others to ignore oneself. Considering how to respond to "free-will-of-choice" implies utilizing ones free will of choice. The contradiction should be obvious...alas ignorance is bliss.
Instead of finding something to reason (agree vs disagree; like vs dislike; want vs not want; belief vs disbelief etc.) over...try to apply implication (if/then) to any "gem" standing out to you. This way one doesn't need to trade (question for answer) with others; but draws from solution (inception towards death) as self (life)...which is how one sustains self.
Nature implies balance (momentum of motion)...anyone within responds as choice. Others cannot grow self discernment for one-self. As in...no answer from me could give you self discernment.
A chosen one simply distracts other ones from being choice within balance...and choosing to consent to what others are suggesting sustains the distraction (ignorance) within self.
a person from another world to me.
Per sonos (by sound)...that's the same world each different instrument lives in. Others suggest definitions for "world" to distract one from that.
Knowledge (perceivable inspiration) is everywhere...you close yourself off to it when trying to look inside/insight others for suggested information.
What you view as gems isn't what I offer; but to what you allow yourself to open up to. You're in control over adapting to perceivable or consenting to suggested; but if you choose suggested; then you give control to those suggesting it.
As free will of choice...not to the suggested choices by others. I chose "free-will-of-choice" to make it harder for others to ignore oneself. Considering how to respond to "free-will-of-choice" implies utilizing ones free will of choice. The contradiction should be obvious...alas ignorance is bliss.
Instead of finding something to reason (agree vs disagree; like vs dislike; want vs not want; belief vs disbelief etc.) over...try to apply implication (if/then) to any "gem" standing out to you. This way one doesn't need to trade (question for answer) with others; but draws from solution (inception towards death) as self (life)...which is how one sustains self.
Nature implies balance (momentum of motion)...anyone within responds as choice. Others cannot grow self discernment for one-self. As in...no answer from me could give you self discernment.
A chosen one simply distracts other ones from being choice within balance...and choosing to consent to what others are suggesting sustains the distraction (ignorance) within self.
Per sonos (by sound)...that's the same world each different instrument lives in. Others suggest definitions for "world" to distract one from that.