This world...broken...could never put...back together
That represents the suggested inversion of this world breaking (inception) and putting itself back together (death), as to establish partials (growth) within whole (loss).
Alchemy...whole to partial (inception); partial within whole (life) and partial to whole (death) aka ingredient out of base transmutation.
heading towards collapse
One can only be develop (living) within collapse (process of dying)...others suggest progressivism (heading towards) to tempt one to ignore that resisting develops resistance within velocity of collapse.
what happen to problems? They get solved
What happens to problems (life)? They get solved (inception towards death)...others suggest "math" to tempt one to solve problems by seeking solutions.
Powers That Be
Being (growth) implies empowered within (loss).
They are interjecting
Being implies partial (perception) within whole (perceivable)...others interject suggestions to tempt partial to ignore whole.
they are moving...
Inception towards death (whole) moves life (partial)...being alive implies RE (response to) MOVE (being moved by). Others utilize suggestions to direct one to follow along, while ignoring to respond to (living) being moved by (process of dying).
avoid population collapse
a) POPULOUS (the whole number of people) TION (action)...being implies reaction of each one person (aka each partial) within whole action.
NUMBER (designation of a unit) + UNIT (Latin unus; one) implies each one person (Latin per sonos; by sound) aka each partial unit within whole sound.
b) Ones consent to the suggestions by others represents "a-void" aka Latin viduus, divido - "a division; emptiness; nothingness"
Everything is managed
By ones consent to ignore everything (perceivable inspiration) for permitting others to define; redefine; contradict and hence manage "nothing" (suggested information).
Nature implies fluid generator (loss) of solid reactors (growth)...others slap labels like "tree" on a solid within fluid to gain control over all those who consent to hold onto the suggested label.
you got some gems of knowledge and insight in there
Knowledge (perceivable inspiration) is everywhere...you close yourself off to it when trying to look inside/insight others for suggested information.
What you view as gems isn't what I offer; but to what you allow yourself to open up to. You're in control over adapting to perceivable or consenting to suggested; but if you choose suggested; then you give control to those suggesting it.
i never how to respond
As free will of choice...not to the suggested choices by others. I chose "free-will-of-choice" to make it harder for others to ignore oneself. Considering how to respond to "free-will-of-choice" implies utilizing ones free will of choice. The contradiction should be obvious...alas ignorance is bliss.
Instead of finding something to reason (agree vs disagree; like vs dislike; want vs not want; belief vs disbelief etc.) over...try to apply implication (if/then) to any "gem" standing out to you. This way one doesn't need to trade (question for answer) with others; but draws from solution (inception towards death) as self (life)...which is how one sustains self.
Nature implies balance (momentum of motion)...anyone within responds as choice. Others cannot grow self discernment for one-self. As in...no answer from me could give you self discernment.
A chosen one simply distracts other ones from being choice within balance...and choosing to consent to what others are suggesting sustains the distraction (ignorance) within self.
a person from another world to me.
Per sonos (by sound)...that's the same world each different instrument lives in. Others suggest definitions for "world" to distract one from that.
That represents the suggested inversion of this world breaking (inception) and putting itself back together (death), as to establish partials (growth) within whole (loss).
Alchemy...whole to partial (inception); partial within whole (life) and partial to whole (death) aka ingredient out of base transmutation.
One can only be develop (living) within collapse (process of dying)...others suggest progressivism (heading towards) to tempt one to ignore that resisting develops resistance within velocity of collapse.
What happens to problems (life)? They get solved (inception towards death)...others suggest "math" to tempt one to solve problems by seeking solutions.
Being (growth) implies empowered within (loss).
Being implies partial (perception) within whole (perceivable)...others interject suggestions to tempt partial to ignore whole.
Inception towards death (whole) moves life (partial)...being alive implies RE (response to) MOVE (being moved by). Others utilize suggestions to direct one to follow along, while ignoring to respond to (living) being moved by (process of dying).
a) POPULOUS (the whole number of people) TION (action)...being implies reaction of each one person (aka each partial) within whole action.
NUMBER (designation of a unit) + UNIT (Latin unus; one) implies each one person (Latin per sonos; by sound) aka each partial unit within whole sound.
b) Ones consent to the suggestions by others represents "a-void" aka Latin viduus, divido - "a division; emptiness; nothingness"
By ones consent to ignore everything (perceivable inspiration) for permitting others to define; redefine; contradict and hence manage "nothing" (suggested information).
Nature implies fluid generator (loss) of solid reactors (growth)...others slap labels like "tree" on a solid within fluid to gain control over all those who consent to hold onto the suggested label.
Knowledge (perceivable inspiration) is everywhere...you close yourself off to it when trying to look inside/insight others for suggested information.
What you view as gems isn't what I offer; but to what you allow yourself to open up to. You're in control over adapting to perceivable or consenting to suggested; but if you choose suggested; then you give control to those suggesting it.
As free will of choice...not to the suggested choices by others. I chose "free-will-of-choice" to make it harder for others to ignore oneself. Considering how to respond to "free-will-of-choice" implies utilizing ones free will of choice. The contradiction should be obvious...alas ignorance is bliss.
Instead of finding something to reason (agree vs disagree; like vs dislike; want vs not want; belief vs disbelief etc.) over...try to apply implication (if/then) to any "gem" standing out to you. This way one doesn't need to trade (question for answer) with others; but draws from solution (inception towards death) as self (life)...which is how one sustains self.
Nature implies balance (momentum of motion)...anyone within responds as choice. Others cannot grow self discernment for one-self. As in...no answer from me could give you self discernment.
A chosen one simply distracts other ones from being choice within balance...and choosing to consent to what others are suggesting sustains the distraction (ignorance) within self.
Per sonos (by sound)...that's the same world each different instrument lives in. Others suggest definitions for "world" to distract one from that.