Scientists grow whole...
a) -ist implies ones consent to a suggested -ism; which contradicts SCI'ENCE (Latin scientia, scio, to know)...suggestion contradicts perception if one consents to it.
b) only within whole (loss) can there be partials (growth).
Neo-totalitarianism
a) there can't be new (neo) within whole (total)...only "now".
b) -ism implies suggestion by one (partial) towards submissive consent by another (partial)...within total (whole).
c) notice "arian-ism" (adhering to the doctrines of Arius)...hidden inside suggested "totalit-arian-ism".
mass formation
Flow (inception towards death) to form (life) implies section (Latin seco; to divide)...it's the suggested collectivism by others which tempts each section to consent to a mass, hence submitting to a massa...
psychologist
a) -ist implies ones consent to suggested -ism.
b) suggested logi (logic/reason aka logos/word) tempts one to ignore perceivable psyche (animating spirit aka sound/entire).
https://img.gvid.tv/i/3r5AEBSo.jpg ...e pluribus unum (out of many, one) aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka melting pot aka we (pluralism) the (theism) people (collectivism).
is it actually based on anything?
Anything reacting (life) is based within everything enacting (inception towards death) upon it. Only within every (whole) can there be any (partials)...
your own
If life belongs to self; then how could nature give (inception) and take (death) it to the ones possessing life?
surely is not...
a) does reason contradict infallibility (sure)?
b) how could nothing (not) be infallible (sure)?
"It doesn't make any sense"
"it" implies one being able to discern (sense) it, while making suggestions about "it" implies demonstrating it towards the senses of others.
I wonder if they gotta take it...
If being implies resistance (life) within temptation (inception towards death); then others will tempt ones resistance. Some lack the spine (33 vertebrae) to resist the temptation of wanting to take what others are suggesting, and so they're gonna get fucked one way or the other...
Look into חוט השני (khutt hashani) aka scarlet or crimson string within Kabbalah...
good christians
"good" implies ones consent to suggested dualism (good vs bad), while "christ" (anointed one) implies oneself consecrated with oil when passing through the birth-channel.
trinity
It's on oneself to discern that "inception; life; death" doesn't represent three; but ones passage.
Others suggest dualism (reason) and trinitarianism (collectivism) to distract one from discerning ONE-self.
baphomet
PHO (phonic, sound) MET (assembly)...whole (sound) sets itself apart (instruments), hence disassembly.
Those who ignore that for assembled words, are BA-bbling on (utter sound indistinctly; to prate); while building a tower of BA-bel (confusion; disorder), while sounding like sheep going BA-aaaa.This also ties into phonetician deity BA'AL...
to lucifer
"to" implies towards outcome; bearing the light (lucis; lux) implies within and in response to origin. Enlightenment implies ones radiant (enlighten) mind/memory (ment).
It's on oneself to resist suggested (lucifer the light bearer) within perceivable (that which bears light)...
referring to
"refer" implies tracing back to origin; "to" implies towards outcome...oneself exists in-between (life) origin (inception) and outcome (death).
Nice.
a) ESTA'TE (fixedness; a fixed condition)...within reality being implies solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death).
b) REAL (moving) ESTATE (affixed)...a deliberate contradiction in terms.
c) holding onto suggested information (affixed) while ignoring to let go of perceivable inspiration (moving) represents obsession.
Doesn't tell you what the orders in red are.
Black & green refer to the labels underneath the symbols.
Black & green
Aka ignorance (destitute of light) & comprehension (growth).
becoming hell
Hell (helios; light) and HEAVEN (heavy) aka light (inception towards death) coming to be heavy (life) hence one having to bear light (light-bearer)...
Even if it's not in a religious sense
a) choosing to ignore natural (perceivable) for artificial (suggested) binds one to another, hence Latin RELIGIO (to bind anew).
b) Latin SENTIO (to perceive)...not what others are suggesting about it.
c) only within even (inception towards death) can there be odds (life)...
name is...
...a brand aka a burned offering (suggestion) tempting one to ignite (consent) self.
ignite
Aka inception...spark of life.
to give birth, produce...to come into being
Whole gives birth/produces partials...only within whole (inception towards death) can partial (life) come into being, hence IN (within) TO (towards)...
pheonix
PHONICS (sound aka entire aka whole aka surrounding)...only within sound can instruments arise; only within entire can fractions arise; only within whole can partials arise; and only within surrounding (balance) can center (choice) arise.
rise out of ash
a) ASH, noun - "a well known tree" aka tree of knowledge... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/ash
b) nation of ash aka ashke-nazi...
Ordo ab chao
The suggested inversion of CHAO (life) ab/in ORDO (inception towards death).
a) watch it without sound; focus on his eyes and allow yourself to be aware of his arms and hand-gestures.
b) notice the pied-piper symbolism surrounding him.
c) notice the natural view on the artificial screens in-between the two shelves (towers).
d) notice a device to capture momentum (camera) and a milk-can for the cattle.
unofficial organization
Official (as suggested by others) or unofficial (as chosen by self within perceivable)...
OF'FICE, noun (Latin officium; ob and facio, to make or do.) - "a particular duty, charge or trust conferred by public authority"...take the suggested "public authority" out, and one is left with being particular (life) within duty (inception towards death).
iron law
IRON (capable of destroying aggregation); hence IRONY (speech dissembler)...
an oligarchy will form in any organization
ORGAN - "instrument (life) of action (inception towards death) + OLIGARCHY (many ruled by few)...if one ignores self (instrument within sound) for others; then one with choice becomes an instrument of a chosen one.
this includes nations
NATION (a people) implies each one person aka per sonos (by sound); hence all instruments inclusive within sound.
There will always be elites
Because ELITE (selection; choice) implies free WILL of choice, and ALL WAY (inception towards death) implies each one (life) within.
the only way elites are ever held accountable
The selected few (elite) manage the ACCOUNT (a registry of a debt or credit) of the consenting many, who each hold onto suggested collectivism (counting) by creed (consent; belief; faith).
In short...many are willingly holding onto parasitic few, while refusing to let go.
organized minority defeats and unorganized majority
Organized (one utilizing free will of choice within perceivable) or unorganized (one ignoring free will of choice when consenting to suggested choices by others). Organization aggregates disorganization.
the selection process is fake.
The few suggest representative government through voting; the many consent by both voting or not voting. What's fake about that?
talks too much but says too little
Information warfare aka endless suggested information to tempt others to reason (warfare) against one another over it.
No. It has no market.
No implies versus yes...a conflict of reason shaped by ones consent towards suggested aka a trade...sell (suggested) meets buy (consent), hence one being willingly marked by the suggestions of others.
Half of any market. The rest of the globe are watching it like how?
a) being implies center (choice) of surrounding (balance)...ones consent to the suggestions by others shapes imbalance, hence a conflict aka side vs side, while ignoring center within surrounding, hence MARKET (consent towards suggested) and SHARE (want vs not want) aka sharing conflict.
b) watching a movie tempts one to believe in rest (cessation of motion). Why? Because a suggested picture represents a "captured moment-um", while a suggested movie represents a "moving picture".
It's not about watching a suggested movie or not; but about ones consent to suggested "motion" (movie). Being implies RE (respond to) MOVE (being moved by), hence life responding to being moved from inception towards death.
One cannot move; only re-move, hence being (living) re-moved (process of dying).
The few suggest movies to a) distract the many from being moved and b) to lure them into conflicts of reason against one another, hence re-moving each other willingly.
Try viewing it from a magic perspective...the trick is about hiding perceivable motion underneath suggested "movie". The distraction is everything within and about the suggested movies.
It works like a CHARM (to subdue or control by incantation or secret influence).
Motion to change
To(wards) implies being within changing motion.
If you make crap show it for free
It's being shown for each ones "free" will of choice. Others cannot make free; only balance (dominating whole) can make choice (free partials). Being choice implies RE (responding to) MAKE (made by).
The suggested conflict between original vs remake tempts one to ignore being re-make (life) within origin (inception towards death).
Writing the above sentence gets others hostile towards me; while suggesting "Robocop...original vs remake?" would get others into countless conflicts of reason.
the same insertion
IN (being within) SERO (thrust by) aka different inserts (life) within same thrust (inception towards death).
it's awful
a) AWE (ones reverential fear) FULL (replete; having within its limits all that it can contain).
b) awful implies vs wonderful aka your consent to reason about the suggestions of others, while ignoring perceivable...being partial within whole.
c) the suggestions by others cannot be "full", since perceivable offers more than suggestions shaped within.
It hasn't changed anything else.
Each temporary thing (solid) can only exist within constant change (liquid)...other suggest movies (stop-motion for example) to distract one from that.
want answers?
a) Want (suggested) tempts one to ignore need (perceivable).
b) Wanted (answer) tempts one to ignore needed (solution).
c) Suggested answers tempt one on a quest (question) towards outcomes; while perceivable solution (inception towards death) inspires one (life) to resist origin.
d) "mark of the beast" meets "question mark"...what's lacking? BE (being) AST (astute; discerning).
watching
a) WATCH (to guard)...ones consent to others telling-a-vision (television) through suggestion keeps one wide open for reception of harm.
b) what others are suggesting represents an apparition (mere appearance, opposed to reality) aka a spectacle tempting those who consent to SPEC'TER (Latin specto, to behold); hence one willingly holding onto the suggested.
c) it's called a "movie" (motion), yet you are here complaining about holding onto what movies once were, while ignoring that motion equals change.
actors...
...are reacting to directors to tempt one to ignore to react (life) to direction (inception towards death). Consenting to suggested actors tempts one to mimic acting, hence "monkey see; monkey do".
It takes more effort trying to watch it...I am not paid to watch it.
PAY (to discharge a debt)...ones efforts, while consenting to watch suggestions by others, represents one spending resistance; hence being tempted to discharge self, while indebting self with the suggestions by others.
The more one remembers how things were; the more debt (Latin debitum, contracted; that which is due from one person to another) ones memory is burdened with.
pay your audience
Audience aka AUDIRE (to hear) aka AU (to perceive)...perceivable is offered in full (whole) to each ones perception (partial). Paying consent to the suggestions by others tempts one to ignore that.
become
Suggested "become" represents the inversion of coming (inception towards death) to be (life).
a) consenting viewer (white); suggested show (black); mediator for suggested (jew).
b) consenting to "take" suggested from another, places one "under" the other, while being tempted to blame others for "taking over".
c) only whole (inception towards death) continues; not partials (life) within. Others suggest CONTINUE (to hold; to remain in a state, to abide for any time indefinitely; to be permanent) as the inversion of perceivable.
book of clarence
Binding oneself to a book by consent tempts closure (ignorance) over clearance (comprehension).
a) "they" implies discernible HU'MAN (Heb. form, species)...does "not" have a discernible form?
b) hue-man implies visible spectrum...can one see "not"? What color does "not" have?
Form (human) represents trans-mutation within flow (animal)...suggested -ism tempts one to ignore that.