Nothing human about it. It has been grown by an A.I.
If it developed into a humanoid. It isn't a human.
What use is that thing? Parts. Experiments. Slavery. It has no point. It will divide humanity. My forewarning is when they insert an automated brain, harvesting it like a cow is ethical.
It's a clone. How quick can they age it, is the next question. It won't be long before they're fully grown or given bionics.
I don't need a dumb bot explaining words. You aren't. I know the definitions. Synthetic, synthesised. Not human. So what if it's cells.
they're not...nothing about it...it isn't...it has no...it won't be...I don't...you aren't...not.
That's eight times using "nothing" as the foundation to define something. That represents the suggested embryo of nihilism germinating into ones ignorance of perceivable (everything) for suggested (nothing).
This represents a model of subversion by distracting partial (perception) from whole (perceivable) with a substitute (suggestion).
It has been grown by an A.I.
Ones consent to suggested represents INTELLIGENCE (Latin inteligo; to understand); hence one consenting to stand under another. ARTIFICIAL (artifice; fictitious; in opposition to natural) represents ones ignorance of natural (perceivable) for artificial (suggested).
In the aforementioned example of your behavior...you grew suggested nihilism (nothing) by perpetuating it eight times within a single response. That implies your consent (intelligence) and ignorance (artificial) aka AI.
will divide humanity
HUMAN (heb; form) implies divided through ANIMAL (animation), and will (want) implies divided within need...animation forms will.
My forewarning...
...represents suggested progressivism tempting others to ignore perceivable origin (reality) for suggested outcomes (fiction).
clone
CLONE; noun - "a transplanted part of one original"...aka whole (inception towards death) transmuting into partials (life). Clone implies status quo of being, yet being willingly ignores perceivable implication for suggested dualism aka duplication (cloning) and that implies being a DUPE; noun - "a deceived person".
I know the definitions
Knowledge implies perceiving everything moving: definition implies a suggestion of something affixed, and THE-ism implies ones submission to the authority of another one.
Definition (affixed) contradicts knowledge (moving). Nature doesn't define; it sets each one "free" (will of choice)...it's choice that can be tempted to choose to hold onto (affix) suggested definitions.
Synthetic, synthesised. Not human.
SYN'THESIS, noun -"composition; putting together"...being implies set (inception towards death) apart (life), while having the free will of choice to compose (as instrument aka instructed mind) within sound (entire; whole; everything perceivable).
Others suggest composition (collectivism) aka putting together...e pluribus unum (out of many; one) + tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) + abrahamism (father of multitude) + miscegenation; mass migration; multiculturalism; melting pot + united states; united nations; european union; uniformity; university; universal basic income; unicode; one world system and so on.
So what if it's cells.
Free-dom aka "free" will of choice within "dom"-inance of balance...that represents the foundation for ones confined mind (confinement; cell; apartment aka partial mind; compartment etc).
Balance implies momentum (inception towards death) of motion for each ones choice (life) within. Others suggest organism to distract one from being ORGAN (instrument of action aka instrumental choice within enacting balance). Ones consent to suggested organism permits others to suggest CELL (Latin celare; to hide; conceal; cover), hence utilizing ones consensual ignorance as the cover to conceal perceivable underneath suggested.
a) "they" implies discernible HU'MAN (Heb. form, species)...does "not" have a discernible form?
b) hue-man implies visible spectrum...can one see "not"? What color does "not" have?
Form (human) represents trans-mutation within flow (animal)...suggested -ism tempts one to ignore that.
They're not human. At what is that a human?
Nothing human about it. It has been grown by an A.I.
If it developed into a humanoid. It isn't a human.
What use is that thing? Parts. Experiments. Slavery. It has no point. It will divide humanity. My forewarning is when they insert an automated brain, harvesting it like a cow is ethical.
It's a clone. How quick can they age it, is the next question. It won't be long before they're fully grown or given bionics.
I don't need a dumb bot explaining words. You aren't. I know the definitions. Synthetic, synthesised. Not human. So what if it's cells.
That's eight times using "nothing" as the foundation to define something. That represents the suggested embryo of nihilism germinating into ones ignorance of perceivable (everything) for suggested (nothing).
This represents a model of subversion by distracting partial (perception) from whole (perceivable) with a substitute (suggestion).
Ones consent to suggested represents INTELLIGENCE (Latin inteligo; to understand); hence one consenting to stand under another. ARTIFICIAL (artifice; fictitious; in opposition to natural) represents ones ignorance of natural (perceivable) for artificial (suggested).
In the aforementioned example of your behavior...you grew suggested nihilism (nothing) by perpetuating it eight times within a single response. That implies your consent (intelligence) and ignorance (artificial) aka AI.
HUMAN (heb; form) implies divided through ANIMAL (animation), and will (want) implies divided within need...animation forms will.
...represents suggested progressivism tempting others to ignore perceivable origin (reality) for suggested outcomes (fiction).
CLONE; noun - "a transplanted part of one original"...aka whole (inception towards death) transmuting into partials (life). Clone implies status quo of being, yet being willingly ignores perceivable implication for suggested dualism aka duplication (cloning) and that implies being a DUPE; noun - "a deceived person".
Knowledge implies perceiving everything moving: definition implies a suggestion of something affixed, and THE-ism implies ones submission to the authority of another one.
Definition (affixed) contradicts knowledge (moving). Nature doesn't define; it sets each one "free" (will of choice)...it's choice that can be tempted to choose to hold onto (affix) suggested definitions.
SYN'THESIS, noun -"composition; putting together"...being implies set (inception towards death) apart (life), while having the free will of choice to compose (as instrument aka instructed mind) within sound (entire; whole; everything perceivable).
Others suggest composition (collectivism) aka putting together...e pluribus unum (out of many; one) + tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) + abrahamism (father of multitude) + miscegenation; mass migration; multiculturalism; melting pot + united states; united nations; european union; uniformity; university; universal basic income; unicode; one world system and so on.
Free-dom aka "free" will of choice within "dom"-inance of balance...that represents the foundation for ones confined mind (confinement; cell; apartment aka partial mind; compartment etc).
Balance implies momentum (inception towards death) of motion for each ones choice (life) within. Others suggest organism to distract one from being ORGAN (instrument of action aka instrumental choice within enacting balance). Ones consent to suggested organism permits others to suggest CELL (Latin celare; to hide; conceal; cover), hence utilizing ones consensual ignorance as the cover to conceal perceivable underneath suggested.