- How does reality generate nothing?
- What's the implication (if/then) of nothing?
- If foundation (reality equals nothing) contradicts itself, then does anything build upon also contradict itself?
- How could one measure being (are) while being within something?
- What's the foundation for implication (if/then)?
- What if others contradict IF with "weather or not" and THEN with "for this reason" as to distract one from what if/then implies?
- Does if/then imply motion?
- What generates memory?
- Is the primary function of memory storage or adaptation to input?
- If memory has a hole; then where does it leak into?
- How does input go into memory without leaking out?
- Does memory imply a concealed or open device?
- "been holed" implies being...what does being a hole imply? (besides prostitution).
- How could many be continuously memory holed by few?
- What if "hole" isn't a leak, but the habitation of fluid flowing through solid?
- What if solid implies the hole; leak; fissure; crack; departure etc. within liquid?
- What if others suggest "hole" upon partial (solid) to distract one from "whole" (liquid)?
- What if a liquid whole (motion) can generate a memory (momentum) for each solid partial (mind) within?
Matthew Perry wasn't even top of Friends...
Edit: Bottom to top...Phoebe; Chandler; Ross; Monica; Joey; Rachel.
You'd like his work.
I bought Flesh of My Flesh, Blood of My Blood at release back in the days...for the beats to break to. Reading the lyrics decades later was a humbling experience about my own ignorance...
He did word magic.
Magic aka secret operations (suggested words) of natural causes (perceivable sound)...it's on oneself to discern that, while others tempt one to ignore the latter for the former.
scripture study link
Thanks for the inspiration.
Mr. Beast...a trade secret
a) MIS'TER, verb - "to occasion loss" + BE (being) AST (astute) aka being (life) discerning (astute) to occasion loss (inception towards death).
b) ones consent (buy) to suggested (sell) implies a suggested trade, tempting one to ignore perceivable trade aka EX (expressed life) within CHANGE (inception towards death).
Consenting to a suggested trade also tempts one to hold onto the suggested commodity, hence "marking" self aka blemishing ones (be) discernment (ast)...mark of the beast...with ignorance.
c) ignoring perceivable for suggested implies unseen reality through the lens of watching fiction aka fiction keeping reality a secret.
Meanwhile in realtiy...SE'CRET, adjective (Latin secretus; seg, to separate) implies the separation of whole (inception towards death) into each partial (life).
Self discernment uncovers that secret, while ignorance keeps it hidden.
- one liners implies ones (life) line (inception towards death)...
- radio implies ones (perception) radius (perceivable)...
- gangster implies collecting (suggestion) members (consent) into gangs (collectivism)...
DMX was like an apprentice (rap) going against a master (spell-craft)...attempting to blame an industry; while failing to realize INDUS'TRIOUS, adjective (Latin industria) - "constant" aka being temporary (life) within constant (inception towards death).
A master of spell-craft tricked an apprentice to willingly go against the foundation of life, hence leading him to his own demise.
That's deep words on deaf ears...
Jumping over quicksand; fleeing from murder hornets; escaping holes in the ozone-layer; duck and cover under some table to survive nuclear explosions...
"It's the hard-knock life for us...'Steada treated, we get tricked"
a) intelligence (Latin intelligo; to understand) implies standing under another...which is detrimental to ones own growth.
b) diction implies suggested fiction (words); which tempts one to ignore perceivable reality (sound).
c) others suggest collectivism (theasaurus; treasury; storehouse; repository etc.) as the inversion of nature setting each one within "free" will of choice.
In short...nature doesn't collect together; it sets apart.
doesnt make
How does one make nothing?
HAS (hassenfeld) BRO (brothers)
More ignorance; more niggers...you'll see.
Jerusalem dating be like... https://img.gvid.tv/i/2DtKRzxh.jpg
If many ignore being in-between white (pure light) and black (absence of light), then collective ignorance (darkness) rules over partial discernment (brightness).
Being in-between pure light and the absence thereof implies within the visible spectrum of light as a hue (color) man within animal (Latin anima; animation).
agentur of the illuminati
a) Illumination implies being illuminated (reaction) by light (action).
b) suggested agency of (agentur of) tempts one to ignore being regent (life) within agent (inception towards death).
c) "the" implies suggested the-ism aka ones submission to the authority of others.
d) consider ILL LUMEN NAUGHTY...in regard to naught (nothing, in no degree).
rothschild
- Roth (red; blood) implies blood (life) within line (inception towards death).
- Schild (shield; defense) implies defense (life) within offense (inception towards death).
innocent
IN (being within) NOCERE (harm) aka being (life) within harms way (inception towards death)....who's guilty of ignoring that?
we don't know
a) KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists"...nature offers everything (perceivable) to each one (perception), while the suggestions of others tempt one to ignore that.
b) others suggest nihilism (don't aka doing nothing) and pluralism (we) to distract one from discerning self, while being (life) done by all (inception toward death).
for theses schizos
https://files.catbox.moe/4ve91i.jpg ...Sigismund Schlomo Freud (alleged father of psychoanalysis) + Paul Eugene Bleuler (allegedly coined schizophrenia", "schizoid" and "autism") conspiring together to "conquer psychiatry" (erobern die Psychatrie).
2023 and here you are still perpetuating their tools of conquest...
keep cracking words
a) nature (inception towards death) doesn't keep...it releases (life) aka ongoing loss generating temporary growth.
b) whole (inception towards death) cracks itself internally into partials (life). How? Motion generating momentum for transmuted form at the center.
c) all suggestible words are shaped within perceivable sound...consenting to the former tempts one to ignore the latter, while permitting another to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested at will.
non-retarded
Ones consent to suggested nihilism (non) implies RE (response) TARDO (to delay) aka ones delayed reaction within perceivable (reality), when consenting to suggested (fiction).
english
Aka anglo; angel; angle...nature generates level aka balance aka momentum of motion for each ones free will of choice within.
"free" will of choice within "dom"inance of balance aka free-dom aka free (life) within dom (inception towards death).
Others suggest angles to "corner" ones choice, as well as geocentrism to distract one from being center (perception) of surrounding (perceivable) and geometric (aka gematria) to distract ONE from self by counting others.
language
Nature doesn't orate (forming speech)...it implies flowing sound for each form within. Others form speech aka spell-craft to distract one from perceivable flow (inspiration) with suggested form (information).
Ones consent tempts one to hold onto suggested form within ones mind/memory, which is where masons of free (will of choice) utilize ones consent as mortar and suggested information as bricks to build the "wailing" wall of ignorance within others.
Adapting to perceivable sound implies PHONETICIAN (from phonic, sound), while consenting to suggested "definition" implies DEAF PHONETICIAN...hence ignoring sound for words.
Ones consent to suggested grammar permits others to wield a grimoire, while ones ABC (Latin abecadary) becomes another's ABraCaDabra.
so many insane people
a) people implies each one person
b) others suggest "insane person" to tempt one to ignore the perceivable implication of being "in sanus" (within sound) and "per sonos" (by sound).
1 letter -> 1 sound
a) SOUND, adjective (Latin sanus) - "entire; unbroken; whole"...being within sound implies each one broken instrument aka IN (within) STRU (structured) MENT (mind).
b) consenting to suggested LET-ters implies LET, verb - "to lease; to permit; to allow; to suffer; to give leave or power; to withhold restraint; not to prevent".
Sound forces instruments to adapt as free will of choice within dominating balance (resonance/dissonance)...choosing to "let" others implies dissonance for self based on ignorance to resonate with all, whole; entire; sound.
...is...is not
Everything was perceivable before one can suggest what it is or isn't...a conflict of reason (is vs isn't) about the latter; tempts one to ignore the implication (if/then) of the former.
The chosen few utilize implication (balance); while tricking the consenting many to enslave themselves within reason (imbalance).
Sleight of hand: Georgia Guidstones - "Let these be the guidestones to an age of reason".
the egg of the lizard
Egg (concealed growth potential) lizard (reptile; repeat aka frequency) aka ones free will of choice...the concealed potential of frequency for resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death) of energy (Greek work; internal/inherent power).
jesus
Aka the anointed one aka the one consecrated by unction of oil aka each one off-spring coming to be through the birth-channel.
Some dislike jesus (abortion), while suggesting jesus to swim within boiling feces (sodomy)...all to prevent jesus to resurrect (inception) and rise (life) again.
1,2,3...
Nature sets each ONE free...others tempt one to count, which when consented to, permits others to hold one accountable.
tree of life
YGG (egg) DRASIL/LISARD (lizard)...
Just as with anything right now, there are two sides
a) anything implies each "one" thing.
b) "one" thing doesn't have two sides, unless another one looks at it.
c) left/right aren't two sides; but ones choice within "SIGHT" of balance.
d) suggested SIDE tempts one to ignore perceivable SIGHT.
ordinary people are caught in between
Natural order (inception towards death) doesn't catch those (life) within...it sets each one as "free" will of choice into balance (inception/death).
Once again...inception/death aren't two sides; but ones life within balance (momentum) of oneness (motion).
Every conflict between ordinary people benefits the hidden rulers
Aka every conflict (of reason) between ordinary people (consenting ones) benefits the hidden (ignored) rulers (suggesting ones).
Pakistan and Afghanistan
- Who suggests the sides?
- Who exchanges "and" for "vs" when consenting to either suggested side?
- Who attached differences (Paki + Afghani) to an equal (Stan)?
- What happens to differences (life) within equal (inception towards death)?
just like
If the natural order is "just", then what if each one within needs to be discriminatory to sustain self, while being tempted by others to respond "alike" instead?
know not
How could one perceive (know) nothing (not)?
likewise
a) What if like (equal) contradicts wise (different)?
b) What if others suggest "likewise" to distract one from being differentiated (life) within equal (inception towards death)?
put your faith in Jesus Christ
How does ones faith reach "patris et filii et spiritus sancti" without first being siphoned off by those who suggest "in nomine" (in the name of)?
be with you all
Being implies one apart from one another within all. Collectivizing ones into an "all" tempts ones to ignore that one can only collect partials within whole aka within all aka within a container.
Why call others "all" when there's more than these others? Why ignore the implication of every one (all) when addressing only a specific group of ones?
The god
Using "the" implies ones consent to suggested the-ism by another, hence not to "god" but to those suggesting "god".
a) any suggested gospel (good spell) implies as suggested by others and consented to by oneself.
b) if alleviation (life) within suffering (inception towards death) chooses to ignore resisting, then it prevents itself from growing, hence experiencing more suffering.
c) one cannot violate (sin) origin (perceivable)...only ignore it for a substitute (suggested).
d) only within soundness (inception towards death) can there be fault (life).
religion...the idea of
Idealism implies the suggested information by others; religion (Latin religio, to bind anew) implies ones consent to the suggested information by others.
The many are tricked to talk about what people believe or disbelief as religion, while ignoring the implication of binding self to another when choosing to believe suggested information.
Furthermore; IDE'A, noun (Latin video; Gr. to see) implies perceivable...not suggested. One perceives before another can suggest what one sees.
gnostic belief
Gnostic (to know) implies as perceived; believing implies consenting to suggested. Perceivable doesn't require belief; it's enforced upon ones perception.
For example...one doesn't need to believe in hunger; one is forced to adapt to it.
wants to know
Want (suggested) tempts one to ignore need (perceivable)...one needs to resist wanted temptations.
the truth
Wanting (truth) or not wanting (lies) suggested tempts one to ignore adapting to need (change). What happens if one applies change to truth? It becomes a lie.
Im open to anything
Which permits others to dumb suggested information into you. Meanwhile....perceivable inspiration flows through you at any moment, ready for you to draw inspiration from it by adapting to it.
life is suffering
SUF'FER, verb (Latin suffero; to bear)...bearing response-ability (choice) or shirking it onto others by following their suggested choices is each ones free will of choice.
One can only alleviate (life) within suffering (inception towards death)...resistance alleviates life; temptation suffers life.
they are all doing the same thing at the same time
a) chosen "one" implies opposite of "all".
b) being implies difference (life) within sameness (inception towards death)...a difference (partial) cannot perceive sameness (whole); only moving differences (other partials).
The trainers...
Ones consent to suggested THE-ism (authority of others) implies ones submission (domestic) to another (trainer).
do...
a) one can only RE (respond to) DO (being done by) aka react (life) to being enacted upon (inception towards death).
b) others suggest performatism aka performative activism to tempt one to ignore wielding a tool of reaction only (free will of choice).
One example for performative activism suggested are "actors" following "directors", which implies reaction. Those who consent ignore being reaction (life) within direction (inception towards death).
no, it's not sentient
Can one perceive (sentience)...no; not; nothing; nothingness?
a) CHAT; verb - "talk idly, babble" aka babbling on (babylon) suggested words, while idling within perceivable sound.
b) consenting (love or hate) to anything suggested by another, tempts one into a conflict of reason (love vs hate) against all those who consented; while permitting those suggesting control over both sides of every conflict.
While reasoning over suggested, one ignores implication (if/then) of perceivable...hunger for example forces one to eat, no matter if one consents (love or hate) or reasons (love vs hate) against others about it.
c) white (pure light) and black (absence of light) cannot be perceived within the visible spectrum of light.
Color implies "inherent within light"; while others suggest colorism to temp one into a white vs black conflict of reason to distract one from growing self discernment about being a hue (color) man.