God’s wrath and judgement is coming upon the wicked, in a just manner for the sins they have committed. Just like a thief in the night will be the coming of the Lord with all power and glory. Society will be eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Jesus Christ returns. So, keep watching friends, brothers, and sisters, for we know not when our Lord shall come, that we may not be taken by surprise.
Just as it was in the days of Noah, so will it be in the days of the Son of Man. They were eating and drinking and marrying and being given in marriage, until the day when Noah entered the ark, and the flood came and destroyed them all. Likewise, just as it was in the days of Lot--they were eating and drinking, buying and selling, planting and building, but on the day when Lot went out from Sodom, fire and sulfur rained from heaven and destroyed them all-- so will it be on the day when the Son of Man is revealed. (Luke 17:26-30 ESV)
Therefore, do not delay, repent of your sins, believe in the Gospel, and put your faith in Jesus Christ; for the kingdom of God is at hand. May the grace of God and our Lord Jesus Christ be with you all.
The only viable interpretation here though is that it will be abrupt, suddenly and unexpected you might say lol, but considering this prophecy is based out of the middle east and middle eastern cultures have included men butt raping children for many generations, it's obvious not the depravity levels that signal the end times, the message is only that it'll catch people off guard
If the natural order is "just", then what if each one within needs to be discriminatory to sustain self, while being tempted by others to respond "alike" instead?
How could one perceive (know) nothing (not)?
a) What if like (equal) contradicts wise (different)?
b) What if others suggest "likewise" to distract one from being differentiated (life) within equal (inception towards death)?
How does ones faith reach "patris et filii et spiritus sancti" without first being siphoned off by those who suggest "in nomine" (in the name of)?
Being implies one apart from one another within all. Collectivizing ones into an "all" tempts ones to ignore that one can only collect partials within whole aka within all aka within a container.
Why call others "all" when there's more than these others? Why ignore the implication of every one (all) when addressing only a specific group of ones?