If many ignore being in-between white (pure light) and black (absence of light), then collective ignorance (darkness) rules over partial discernment (brightness).
Being in-between pure light and the absence thereof implies within the visible spectrum of light as a hue (color) man within animal (Latin anima; animation).
a) intelligence (Latin intelligo; to understand) implies standing under another...which is detrimental to ones own growth.
b) diction implies suggested fiction (words); which tempts one to ignore perceivable reality (sound).
c) others suggest collectivism (theasaurus; treasury; storehouse; repository etc.) as the inversion of nature setting each one within "free" will of choice.
In short...nature doesn't collect together; it sets apart.
If many ignore being in-between white (pure light) and black (absence of light), then collective ignorance (darkness) rules over partial discernment (brightness).
Being in-between pure light and the absence thereof implies within the visible spectrum of light as a hue (color) man within animal (Latin anima; animation).
More ignorance; more niggers...you'll see.
a) intelligence (Latin intelligo; to understand) implies standing under another...which is detrimental to ones own growth.
b) diction implies suggested fiction (words); which tempts one to ignore perceivable reality (sound).
c) others suggest collectivism (theasaurus; treasury; storehouse; repository etc.) as the inversion of nature setting each one within "free" will of choice.
In short...nature doesn't collect together; it sets apart.
How does one make nothing?