Death is just the beginning!
a) BE (being) GIN (Latin gigno; genero; generated)...GIN (inception towards death) generates BE (life).
b) JUST (Latin justus; straight; orderly) implies motion aka natural order.
There's really no exit, more of an entrance
a) For those (life) within momentum (inception towards death) it goes in (inception) and out (death) of motion.
Exit fluid; entrance solid (inception) and exit solid; entrance fluid (death).
b) if one lacks discernment of self, then one lacks to comprehend being one (partial) within oneness (whole).
An indicator for such lack is use of "more", hence ones choice to ignore all that is perceivable for the suggestion of something "more" than everything.
What's Latin for MORE...MAGIS aka magic.
just a shift in dimensional planes
a) only one possible plane (inception towards death) of existence (life).
b) dimension aka DI (divide) MEN (mind/memory)...ones consent (want or not want) to suggested information divides ones mind/memory within a conflict of reason (want vs not want).
Choosing want attaches oneself to wanted. One needs to resist want, because one (life) cannot hold onto all (inception towards death)....only grow self by resisting.
Bonus: DI-MEN aka DIAMOND..."are forever" + "a girls best friend".
c) SHIFT, verb - "to move; to change place or position; to change its direction" implies as solid within momentum of fluid.
Only within momentum (inception towards death) can one (life) choose left/right; up/down; front/back position, while being moved forwards.
Shifting implies ones adaptation to being moved...not shift of motion; of outside; of whole; of sound; of god; of energy etc.
Sleight of hand: Pole Shift implies a shift of pole aka center within surrounding aka erected growth within circumference of loss.
POLE (Latin palus) also implies PHALLUS, hence the whole erection and circumcision thing.
transhumanist don't wanna see
a) -ist (transhumanist) implies ones consent to suggested -ism (transhumanism).
b) if one consents to suggested, then one ignores seeing (perceivable reality) for watching (suggested fiction).
Obvious example...whatever a screen shows isn't reality, but fiction. One cannot see reality through a screen, for whatever is shown on screen implies the distorted sight of another suggesting it.
c) "don't" aka doing nothing...that's the suggested screen you choose to watch reality through. Others cannot take it off, only oneself can choose to let go of it.
The origin of nothing implies suggested nihilism. Ignoring perceivable for it, while defending ones consent to suggested implies ones denial aka de-nihil.
the other side
Being implies as choice in-between balance (need/want)...choosing to hold onto a suggested side (want or not want) tempts one into conflict with others (want vs not want reasoning).
Want isn't the other side of need...being within motion implies need to resist wanted temptation of being moved towards outcome of being. Choosing need doesn't make want disappear; it grows ones resistance within the temptation thereof.
The process of dying implies temptation (want) for each living resistance (need) within. Simultaneously...the process of dying is needed for the living will/want within to adapt to inspiration.
In short...suggested "other side" tempts one to consent to "another's sight". Resist suggested sides; remain centered choice.
death will flee
Will implies solid (living) within fluid (dying). The issue is the suggested word "death", which tempts the living will to focus on outcome of life.
will be longing for
Being implies short (life) within long (inception towards death), hence being tempted to ignore short for long, which in return prevents them from growing short within long, hence growing short longer.
Longing forwards tempts one to ignore growing short (life) by resisting long (inception towards death).
a) If one ignores perceivable (natural), while consenting to suggested (artificial); then artifice exist within mortal.
b) MOR'TAL, adjective (Latin mortalis, from mors, death, or morior, to die, that is, to fall) - "subject to death; destined to die".
Being implies as subjection (life) within objection (inception towards death), hence living within the process of dying aka temporary growth within ongoing loss aka partial within whole.
Before the natural order appoints death; it offers inception for ones life-sentence.
TAL'ENT, noun (Latin talentum; Gr. to bear) - "originally signified a balance or scales".
Talent implies ones perceiving choice within perceivable balance; suggested talentism implies ones consensual submission to whoever suggests the -ism, hence permitting others to vet ones talent (choice).
One has to bear response-ability (free will of choice) by self...sharing implies not caring.
Enabled to swipe fees digitally; still unable to swipe feces without digits.
knowledge shared...anchors...bonds.
a) Knowledge (perceivable) cannot be shared; it's offered to each ones perception in full at any moment of existence.
b) while within perceivable knowledge, each one is being (life) moved (inception towards death).
c) suggestions shaped within knowledge are being shared to tempt each others consent to hold onto it, hence anchoring self, while binding self to another.
Maybe CorbettReport was right about zionism being an institution
Ones consent to suggested -isms (rightism and zionism) burdens oneself with the suggested. That burden represents mount zion; sion; seon (Hebrew tsiyon) aka the center of jewish life and worship.
In other words...while the many drown on their burdens; the few reside upon that burden...unbeknownst to the many carrying it; clamoring to it.
In short...ones consent institutes the suggestions of others as an exponentially growing burden (zion) to self.
If slavery was an institute
a) Slave (consent) institutes master (suggestion)...if "free" will of choice is being ignored.
b) a chosen one was instituted by ones ignorance of choice. If one doesn't choose another one; then another one wasn't chosen.
genocide was kinda an institute,
GENeration (inception towards death) institutes life with the free will of choice to kill (CIDE) itself...others suggest genocide to tempt one to blame others for ones choice.
CIDE is based on ones SIGHT...losing sight leads to killing (CIDE) self.
leading parties
Aka whole (motion) leading (inception towards death momentum) partials (life).
coming together
Being (life) implies in-between setting apart (inception) and coming together (death)...few suggest many to come together, so that few can remain apart.
deeply moved by...bipartisan
a) BI (two) PARTISAN (ones adherent to one another aka sticking together).
b) If life sticks together with other life, while being moved from inception towards death, then it drowns quicker, hence being deeply moved.
Intercourse generates off-spring aka a setting apart. Trying to stick together implies lust aka a temptation luring towards death.
apartheid israel
Aka he that striveth with god (israel) apart from one another...not together with others.
Weapon implies choice (the only instrument of offense/defense) + Nuclear (Latin nucleus; nut)...aka the fruits of ones labor enclosing the kernel of ones seed...if one chooses to ex (express) plode (burst forth).
Gotta erect that mushroom...
boycott israel
a) BOYCOTT - "to combine in refusing to have dealings with, and preventing or discouraging others from doing so".
The issue is that one cannot combine with another one without ignoring self. Any combined effort implies each ones single effort, yet ignoring this permits others to slacken effort.
Example...tug of war. A goy pulls for the team; a jew pretends to pull, while suggesting team efforts (we can make it). Obviously there's a jew on the other side as well, and oblivious to goys is that jews don't even have to attend a tug of war...they simply suggest the goys to play tug of war (reasoning) against each other, while slackening off (suggesting efforts).
b) ISRAEL (Hebrew yisra'el) - "he that striveth with God" aka he that strives (life) within god (inception towards death) for self sustenance.
Once again that implies ones single effort, and not a combined one. Family unit (Latin unitas; unus; one) and off-spring imply ones perpetuation through division aka a setting apart...not a coming together.
Others suggest the word FAMILY (collective body) to distract one from the perceivable UNIT (one apart from one another).
Sleight of hand: "We are family...Everyone can see we're together...(All) all of the people around us they say...Can they be that close...we don't get depressed...Here's what we call our golden rule...Have faith in you and the things you do"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uyGY2NfYpeE (written by Michael David Munves symbolizing akin (sisters) in red + hammer (sledge) aka communism.
It doesn't work.
EN'ERGY, noun (Gr. work) - "internal or inherent power"...everything works or energy couldn't exist.
ORDER OF THE WORLD NOUVEAU
a) Only within order (inception towards death) can there be chaos (life).
b) Others suggest "new" as the inversion of perceivable "now".
c) Whatever comes to be (partials); comes to be within everything already there (whole).
secret society
Secret (seg, segregate) implies apart; society (social; an aggregate body) implies together....nature sets apart (whole into partials); others tempt together (e pluribus unum/out of many; one).
One CAN win against an entity.
Winning implies versus losing...a perpetual conflict of reason; no matter which side one chooses. Entity (being) vs entity implies loss of resistance for both, since both ignore resisting temptation.
To be (choice) implies within momentum (balance) of motion...not within a conflict. If one ignores being by consenting to the suggestions of another being, then one shapes a conflict (reason) against others.
One cannot win against an idea or movement.
a) consenting to suggested idealism shapes the wining vs losing conflict of reason. Without striving towards an ideal, there would be no conflict about who will make it and who fails.
b) being implies MENT/MIND (life) MOVED (inception towards death)...others suggest progressivism (moving forwards) to tempt ones mind to ignore being within motion, and needing to resist.
ORDER means a kind of exclusive group
a) natural order (inception towards death) sets chaos apart (life)...other chaos tempts together (tikkun olam aka healing the world by bringing together).
b) being implies partial (life) within whole (inception towards death)...others suggest exclusivism (debarring from participation) as the inversion thereof.
Joining a group tempts one to believe being part OF it; which tempts one to ignore being part WITHIN whole and apart from one another.
c) order was (perceivable) before any chaos within can suggest what it means.
they hate OWNers
Consenting to suggested implies wanting to hold onto aka wanting to possess aka wanting to own for self....that's what the many do; while the few play the merchants for whatever the many want.
Partial (perception) cannot own whole (perceivable)...only adapt to it momentarily or ignore it for attempting to hold onto other partials.
You're just moving words around
a) all suggestible words (fiction) are shaped within the motion of perceivable sound (reality). Holding onto the meaning of a word aka definition aka information, tempts one to ignore flow of perceivable inspiration...which one cannot hold onto.
b) holding onto words tempts one into circular (around) reasoning, hence fighting over meaning, while remaining within a conflict, no matter which side one chooses.
More likely a back-burner narrative (tranny manifesto) warmed up to save a spoiled meal (crowder)...
a) consenting to suggested heroism tempts one into hero vs villain reasoning, which in return permits others to suggest villains as heroes and vice versa aka inverting by contradiction aka talmudic reasoning.
In reality hero implies being enterprise (life) within danger (inception towards death), while villain (base) implies ones choice to ignore growing.
b) notice that the label kibbutz (Hebrew qibbus) - "gathering" is being used to distract from few erecting a center among many, while systematically cutting many out of their circumference.
Consenting to suggested laws and norms keeps cattle within a bull-pen. Holding onto within a moving system forces pressure release.
oppositional perspectives
Reasoning over suggestions by others.
counter w/ copy-cat accusations
Contradicting both sides reasoning to keep them going aka talmudic reasoning.
For example...suggested determinism tempts others to reason against each other aka confirm vs denial. Those suggesting the -ism can then simply suggest denial of confirmation and confirmation of denial to keep both sides stuck within a conflict of reason. As soon as the contradictions hit; the accusations begin.
love...peace
Love implies versus hate; peace implies versus war...a perpetual conflict of reason. It doesn't matter which side one chooses...the conflict continues.
Suggesting "I love; am at peace" implies as opposed to "I hate; am at war".
voices in your head. In islam they are called jinn.
The issue with that...JINN; GENIE; GEN (generation). Nature generates sound; those within choose to utter words aka to drive out sound (Latin vox; voco; voice).
Christians don't talk about it much
Following orders contradicts setting oneself free from bonds.
cast out demon
DAI (divider) MON (provider)...natural order provides for and divides into those within. Being within natural order implies being (life) cast in (inception) and out (death).
Casting also implies scattering of seeds...hence loss (inception towards death) scattering the seeds of growth (life).
Chris Gardner BioCharisma podcast
Here he is blowing minds with Longo... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=teJ2_6JMpm0
Others lobbying (suggestion) for ones power (consent)...
Ones free will of choice can only ignore spirit (Latin spiro; to breathe) momentarily before nature forces adaptation.
was (is?)
Perceivable was; before anyone within can suggest what is.
a public speaker
a) PUB'LIC, adjective - "pertaining to a nation, state or community; extending to a whole people; as a public law, which binds the people"
b) listening to public speech implies ones consent to being bound by another into a collective.
from anti-vaxx to pro-zio
Consider a boxing ring...different sides within same ring. Getting in gets one hurt. Those suggesting the ring become invisible to both those fighting within and those onlookers in circumference.
REASON is that boxing ring.
Being enabled to hear (oto); smell (rhino) and taste (laryn) should be ones specialty...reasoning (logi) over this with others, tempts one to ignore that.
Edit: notice that healthcare provided food tastes bad; that the healthcare environment smells bad, and that the patients seldom listen to anything suggested...
- being implies center (choice) of balance (need/want)
- suggested choices by others tempts one to choose a side (want or not want)
- consenting to suggested puts one into imbalance (want vs not want).
- others suggest one to balance self by choosing imbalance (conflicts of reason)
- ones consent permits another control over both suggested sides within all conflicts (of reason).
hey kids! check out
Aka sign yourself in on the dotted line and contract yourself to another.
Sleight of hand: "check yourself before you wreck yourself"
Understanding aka choosing to stand-under implies ISLAM (aslama; resignation; submission; surrender), hence Arabic muslim "one who submits".
a) THEO (divine; division) LOGIC (reason; conflict about aggregated)...others conspire to use logic as to tempt one to ignore theo.
b) nature sets itself apart...from whole (perceivable) divided into partials (perception)...others utilize suggestion to bind ones consent aka RELIGION (Latin religio; to bind anew).
If one consents to the suggestions by another, then one ignores being partial within whole, for being a part of a collective by another aka falling for the temptation of collectivism.
In other words...e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka multiculturalism aka mass migration aka miscegenation aka melting pot aka united states; united nations; european union; university; universal basic income; unicode; uniformity etc.
Sleight of hand: "There comes a time when we heed a certain call When the world must come together as one"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p34sK9AYQN4
Neo (new) implies vs old; hate implies versus love; atheist implies vs theist; deity implies vs devil; prophet implies vs receiver; later implies vs sooner; you implies vs me; israel implies vs palestine; legit implies versus illegitimate; sudden implies vs foreseen; becoming implies vs coming to be; very implies vs just; religious implies vs free; old implies vs young; testament implies vs contradiction; follower implies vs resistor...
All these represent conflicts of reason, shaped by ones consent to the suggested information of others, while ignoring perceivable inspiration.
Reason represents ones sight through the lens of conflict aka ones sight blended by what others show.
Nature operates on implication (if/then)...not on reason (conflict aka want vs not want; true vs false; yes vs no; belief vs disbelief; good vs bad; us vs them; rich vs poor; east vs west; left vs right; big mac vs whooper; soccer vs football etc.)...few utilize suggestion to tempt many to reason against one another over suggested.
Consenting to suggested permits those suggesting to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) it at will, while all those who consented are stuck within circular reasoning aka ouroboros (snake eating itself).
tl; dr...looking at a screen makes one a believer or disbeliever of those suggesting it. Whatever is being suggested on-screen is designed to affirm; deny and contradict both believers and disbelievers as to keep them consenting to the suggested offer.
Suggestion is sold; consent is tempted to buy into it...consenting to suggested implies selling self out to the happy merchant of temptation.