Consenting to suggested aka mercantilism (buy + sell) aka religion (Latin religio; to bind anew) aka masons of free will utilizing bricks (suggested information) and mortar (ones consent) to build walls of ignorance within others etc.
That's glue. Meanwhile...natural order (inception towards death) sets free (life); so no matter how sticky the temporary problems; nature implies the ongoing solution.
tl; dr: want tempts sticky fingers; need can't be held onto...it's ones free will of choice.
elie wiesel
A LIE WEASEL
Nazi Germany
AL (brecht) DI (diskont) or VO (rne) KU (rz) HI (nten) LA (ng)...that's how abbreviation works in the German language, which implies NA (tional) SO (zialist)...not nazi, which stems from ashke-nazi.
German
Who would suggest GERM (seed of decease) MAN (species; man-kind); and who would hide underneath DEUTSCH > DUTCH > DISH...yid-dish?
time...subscribe
a) Consenting to Sub (under) + Scribe (notary; public writer) + Time (particular duration) tempts one to ignore being DUR (durable aka enabled to endure) ATION (action) aka a life sentence, not formed by letters, but as resistance within velocity, hence not under, but centered within surrounding.
b) NO'TARY, noun - "a clerk, a personal secretary; person whose vocation was making notes or memoranda of the acts of others who wished to preserve them, and writing up deeds and contracts"...ones consent to the suggestions of others implies the written contract (letters inscribed within ones mind), which permits others to makes notes (mark; token) within ones mind/memory.
Consent implies one choosing want (suggested) over need (perceivable); hence ones wish to preserve suggested fiction; while ignoring that perceivable reality cannot be preserved by growth (life) struggling to sustain self within loss (inception towards death).
holocaust ... the holocaust
The former implies status quo of being caust (life) within holo (inception towards death) aka burned offering; while the latter implies those consenting to suggested the-ism, thereby permitting others to define; redefine and contradict "holocaust" at will, until consent is being withdrawn.
To be caust (caustic; corrosive; to wear away) implies survivor (to remain alive) within holo (whole) aka temporary growth (life) within whole loss (inception towards death).
Only self discernment will establish comprehension thereof within oneself, while anything suggested by others will tempt one to ignore self discernment.
tl; dr: Resisting spectacle (suggested) allows special (perception) within common (perceivable) to express self; to sustain self; to discern self...
vitamin
VITA (life) MIN/AMINE/AMMONIA/AMMON (hidden)...ones ignorance hides ones self discernment.
There can be only one hidden (min) life (vita)...
I have no choice but to assume they are intentionally trying to kill me.
Using ones free will of choice to seek healthcare from another implies intentional self harm. How could it be killing if consent was given?
I can retain information well, but I just have no drive to apply myself
Nature drives inspiration through one, which is what one needs to apply adaptation to. Mind/memory isn't designed to retain information; but to process inspiration within a moving system.
The minds/memories of the many are used as a dumping ground for the suggested information by few. Why? To prevent one from discerning self as solid potential within fluid inspiration.
a fraction of what the human race has to offer.
Nature implies whole offer for each fraction within....consenting (buy) to a suggested offer (sell) not only tempts one to ignore that, but also establishes the happy merchant of temptation; selling fiction to all those who're willingly ignore reality.
to give up and die
It's the ongoing process of dying which gives (inception) and takes (death) ones life. The word "to" implies towards aka within motion...
im not going to get the help I need
Natural order (inception towards death) implies need; those within (life) the free will of choice to resist (need) or ignore (want) resisting it.
In other words...only the process of dying supports living; while the living drain each others resistance while dying.
vitamin d deficiency
Try becoming efficient at fishing and milking cows...eat and drink some while you're at it. Eventually one realizes that choosing to be more efficient in something; increases ones resistance to so called deficiencies.
how will they continue
Will implies temporary reaction (life) within ongoing continuation (inception towards death) aka a burned offering.
to shill
Aka to suggest information over perceivable inspiration as a decoy.
the holocaust
a) Suggested the-ism implies ones consent to submit to the suggested authority of others, hence permitting others to define; redefine or contradict "holocaust" at will until consent is being withdrawn.
b) Perceivable holo (whole) caust (to corrode) implies ones state of being solid (life) corroding within fluid (inception towards death).
Those consenting to a) are ignoring b)...
a) "don't you think..." contradicts ones self discernment.
b) Being implies a bit (life) of a stretch (inception towards death)...can one discern that for self?
c) Discernment aka DIS (away; apart) CERNERE (to separate; distinguish; perceive) MENT (mind/memory)...discerning this for self implies taking apart perceivable mentally, while resisting suggested "discernment" aka the word itself and what others suggest it means.
Furthermore...being apart (life) implies within a-way (inception towards death); being partial implies separated within whole; hence distinguishable by perception, and mind/memory implies separated from input...perceivable input (inspiration) goes through ones memory; while suggested input (information) tempts one to hold onto it.
d) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CERN#/media/File:CERN_logo.svg aka 666 aka 6 carbon 6 electron 6 neutron...shouldn't one be able to discern this for self, hence it implying self discernment?
e) European Organization for Nuclear Research
- YOU (eu) ARE (r) A (o) PEON/PAWN (pean)...phonetic.
- Whole action (ation) distribute into suitable parts (organiz)
- For aka forwards aka within motion.
- Nuclear/Nucleus...the opposite of that implies exterior whole, which makes nucleus the interior partial (life) within exterior whole (inception towards death).
- Respond to (re) search for (search)...hence inquiring self discernment unless ignored for suggestions by others.
d) Particle (partials within whole) Physics (from nature; to produce) aka whole nature producing each partials within itself.
e) Intergovernmental aka controlling (govern) mind/memory (ment) internally (intern)...through ones consent of suggestions by others.
f) Notice that each suggested word is shaped by putting letters together; then notice ones consent to the suggested meaning of any put together LETTERS implies oneself LETTING others do it.
LET, verb (Latin elocare; to lease) - "to permit; to allow; to suffer; to withhold restraint; not to prevent"...living within the process of dying implies ones struggle to resist letting it happen.
And once again...to let another contradicts discernment by self.
g) Stretching implies drawing out to greater length...I cut short; take apart; and make putting back together harder. Why? Because great length (life) requires ones resistance to the temptation of stretching (inception towards death).
Tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) tempts those set apart by nature to stretch towards each other, while attempting to hold together. Nature rips any togetherness apart, and resisting that only wastes each ones resistance.
h) Notice the difference between DIS (apart) and CON (together) when applying to CERN...the former implies perceivable; the latter suggested. It's on oneself to discern that...
election
Aka ELECT (to choose; to react) TION (action) aka action (inception towards death) generating reactions (life).
ELECT; adjective - "voluntary" aka through ones free will of choice...
a giant shit-test
Resisting suggested (fiction) within perceivable (reality)...failing flushes one (life) down the drain (inception towards death).
candidates
Aka candid; from root -kand - "to shine, send forth; give out light"...being within visible spectrum of light (hence hu/hue/color-man) implies in-between white (pure light) and black (absence of light), hence being given opportunity to shine...which one ignores when putting other candidates before self.
Also; voting representatives instead of RE (responding to) PRESENT (presented by) as perception within perceivable or willingly standing-under (understanding) others.
Consider lighthouse...beacon...buoy/buoyancy...emitting outwards...
lesser of 2 evils
- Which one implies lesser...want or not want?
- Does want imply more than need, while simultaneously need offering more than want could ever gain?
a) Proverb aka PRO (forwards) VERB (denotes motion)
b) Accuse implies "cause", hence each being charged (inception towards death) with a fault (life).
Sleight of hand: "radio/radius active/action fall-out" aka radius (life) falling out of action (inception towards death) aka growth within loss.
c) Guilt implies "crime" (to separate), hence natural law (inception towards death) separating crimes (life) aka chao ab ordo (chaos out of order).
d) Crying out in pain aka "wailing at the wall of human ignorance"...a wall built with bricks (suggested information) and mortar (ones consent) by masons of free (will of choice).
e) Stabbing implies "to thrust"...those who ignore being (life) thrust (inception towards death) within perceivable, when consenting to suggested, are getting stabbed in the back, and who's responsible for ones ignorance? YOU/JEW/FEW aka chosen ones aka other ones one chooses to blame.
f) Old implies "beyond middle period"...being implies center (perception) of surrounding (perceivable) during life sentence.
a) Blame aka blaspheme aka to arrogate (to make undue claims) prerogatives (exclusive or peculiar privilege). Perceivable implies exclusive prerogative for each ones perception; while the suggestions by one another tempt ones undue claims.
b) Opposite of blame implies innocence aka IN (within) NOCEO (to hurt) aka being (life) within that which hurts (inception towards death), hence each one being born innocence aka "presumption of innocence".
Fake edit: Vistex knows all about NOCEO...
c) Consider the following..."Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat (Proof lies on him who asserts, not on him who denies)...BUT...in regard to him who asserts implying whole (inception towards death) and him who denies implying partials (life).
Nature cannot deny; only being denied by the willing ignorance of each one within, and living within process of dying implies being challenged; claimed; asserted by nature.
As for proof...it's in the pudding/putting (Latin putto; to thrust off) aka each off-spring thrust into being.
Any president is fake
a) Preside aka PRE (before) SIDE (long part or aspect of anything)
b) Motion pre-sides momentum (inception towards death) for matter (life) afterwards.
-ish implies ones approximation. Therefore; if one claiming self as "me; myself or I" brands others as "you/jew", then you-ish implies as approximated by oneself.
Furthermore; approximate (near in position, close to) implies "me near/close to you" as opposed to "one apart from one another"...the latter is perceivable; the former suggested.
CERN magically influencing people despite having sweet fuck all to do with anything even remotely like that.
a) Suggestion can remotely corrupt ones disCERNment...if consented to. This implies enchantment aka secret operations of natural causes.
b) Can self discernment be corrupted by others suggesting the brand "cern"? In other words...can one discern for self when others define cern for one?
game prices
As others struggled to pay for games; I loaned my Neo Geo out to arcades for premium rates...got like two $350-$500 games a month plus enough spare change for the plebian entertainment isles.
it should be discouraged
Building courage requires resistance; those under control ignore resisting when consenting to follow suggestions by others. What happens if you try to discourage those lacking courage?
We're doing so without even realizing it.
a) Only fictitious (suggested) has to be realized (perceivable), hence the sales pitch (suggestion) by few to tempt many to buy (consent) into it.
b) Reality realizes itself...those within need to adapt to perceivable; while resisting the temptation of wanting to realize each others suggestions.
reading the title over and over again...
...implies ones frequency of choice consenting to an inscription (title) aka to "a name by which it is known". That implies idolatry suggested by others; cast upon self.
the article
Aka suggested the-ism + artifice (article) which tempts one to give authority to artificial, while ignoring to be author (augeo, to increase) within reality, hence being enabled to grow.
That implies you wanting to be the controller of others, hence you challenging those already in control. Ask yourself why few use artifice (suggested techniques) to gain control over many within natural (perceivable)?
How can a technique ever be based if it's used to distract others from base?
Consenting to suggested information (any information) permits others to cultivate it within self aka within ones mind/memory. Nature neither requires consent; nor offers information...it forces adaptation, while supplying inspiration.
Insidious propaganda
Propagation (inception towards death) generates inside (life)...that implies proposition; not insidious ambush. Ignoring this for suggested dangers (terror-ism) by others makes oneself insidious, while permitting others to ambush one at will.
You can conquer even the impossible!
Impossible implies "potential within", which one can subdue/conquer by ignoring self for others.
It is not at all about winning or losing but the process!
a) All implies procession (inception towards death); each one within implies being processed (life).
b) Choosing to ignore everything (all perceivable) for nothing (suggested not) tempts one into conflicts of reason (win vs lose).
Withing everything; each one represents win (highest value; evaluation for growth) within lose (loss); reasoning one (win) against the other (lose) destroys self and others.
Good will always prevail evil!
a) Natural order (inception towards death) overcomes/prevails chaos (life)...no matter how chaotic life gets.
b) Ones free "will" of choice ignores self when reasoning (good vs evil) over suggestions by others.
c) Notice that "always" implies way of all (beings within).
the kool-aid everyone drank
Does whatever kool-aid others suggest prevent perceivable thirst from continuing to force adaptation? Adapting to thirst increases ones resistance to temptations like suggested kool-aid.
off NOT
How does one get on NOThing? Could it be ones de-nial of perceivable when consenting to suggested nihil-ism aka Latin nihilo; nothing?
allowing CERN
Allow aka ALL (perceivable) LOW (perception)...only that configuration allows growth of ones self disCERNment.
...sold ICANN
If "I CAN"; then how did a "YOU CAN" gain the power to sell me? What if one claims self as "me; myself or I" establishes everyone else as "you/jew", hence making self a possession, which tempts others to gain hold of it?
How did a few/you/jew gain possession of many?
loses us the entire
Entire implies loss; each partial within implies growth.
become more and more insane
Ignoring to be within (in) sound (sanus) implies ones lack of self discernment about how one comes to be (becomes), which in return prevents ones from comprehending...SOUND, adjective (Latin sanus) - "entire; unbroken".
If one ignores entire (perceivable); then one can be tempted (suggestion) to want more and more...
circle to believe
To believe implies ones consent (want or not want) to the suggestion of another, which tempts one into circular logic/reasoning (want vs not want) against others.
Sleight of hand: "It's the circle of life; and it moves us all; through despair and hope; faith and love...till we find our place (perception)...in the path unwinding (perceivable).
God of HOPE
a)God implies origin; hope implies towards outcome aka ones choice in-between need and want. Notice "of" which implies out of...does one (life) originate out of origin (inception) or out of outcome (death)?
b) Tzeentch, also known as the "Changer of Ways," the "Lord of Change," "Lord of Sorcery," the "Lord of Entropy," the "Great Conspirator," the "Weaver of Destinies," and the "Architect of Fate"...
Aka a chosen one aka the suggestions of another chosen by ones consent, hence permitting others to change ones way; to become overlord of change for ones underling position; to become lord of source (perceivable) while dishing out sauce (suggested); to become lord of loss to those who willing ignore being growth; to conspire instead of inspire; to weave within the fabric of perceivable reality a suggested fiction about outcomes/destinies; to become an architect of FATE/FARI/SPEECH aka a wielder of spell-craft (suggested words within perceivable sound).
all or nothing
All perceivable or denying (nihilo; nothing) it for suggested...it's ones free will of choice.
You aren't required to respond
a) Required (life) to respond (inception towards death)
b) Requirement aka re (response) quire (to seek) ment (mind/memory) aka seek and you'll shall find...it's responding to others (suggestion) which tempts one to ignore what ones mind requires (perceivable).
dilution misdirection
a) Being (life) implies directed (inception towards death)...one can't miss it.
b) Fluid (inception towards death) generates solid (life)...ignoring that dilutes self.
coinintelpro
Aka coin (to wedge) intel (to understand) pro (forwards)...perceivable (inspiration) moves ones perception forwards; suggested (information) tempts one to ignore that, while wedging itself into ones mind/memory, through ones consent to stand-under those suggesting it.
diverting conversations
a) Conjunction (inception towards death) diverts (life). Nature turns outside inwards; those within tempt with the suggested inversion thereof... https://genius.com/Rem-turn-you-inside-out-lyrics
b) Converse aka conjunction (con) verto (to turn) implies circular logic/reason aka turning against one another.
coming together to discuss
a) Discuss aka discutere aka dis (apart) quatere (to shake) contradicts coming together.
b) SHAKE, verb - "to cause to move with quick vibrations; to move rapidly one way and the other; to agitate"...that's what nature (inception towards death) causes upon those agitated to adapt within (life).
Motion generates matter through vibration; wielding choice implies balancing from one side to the other rapidly within momentum of motion, and being reaction implies being agitated/enacted upon.
Sleight of hand: https://genius.com/Harry-belafonte-jump-in-the-line-lyrics
- Jump (life) in the line (inception towards death)
- Shake your body line; shake it all the time.
- Work (energy) your body line; Work it all the time.
- You can talk about Cha Cha, Tango, Waltz, or the Rumba...Senora's dance has no title aka SEN (old; ancient origin) ORA (oration; to speak) and origin of suggested speech implies perceivable sound.
- Left to right (momentum) is the tempo (motion)
- And when she (perceivable) gets the sensation (perception)
- She go up in the air (inception towards death), come down in slow motion (life)
He remained independent...
https://img.gvid.tv/img/367LZGX9.jpg
"Presented the name of Henry Ford, of Dearborn, Michigan, to receive the degrees of the Rite from the Fourth to the Thirty-second, inclusive, and thereafter, the Thirty-third Degree, and asked for unanimous consent to ballot upon this nomination...The request was granted and the ballot spread and, it proving to be clear, Henry Ford was declared to be elected to receive the degrees of the Rite from the Fourth to the Thirty-second, inclusive, in some Valley of the Jurisdiction in which the degrees were being worked under the direction of the Sovereign Grand Commander, and the Thirty Third Degree after he has been duly created a Sublime Prince of the Royal Secret"
I think most are real users
How about this? Only oneself needs to represent perceivable reality; while anything suggested by others implies fiction for self. If one contemplates if others are or aren't real, then one ignores reality (perceivable) for fiction (suggested).
As for most...perceivable implies most; each ones perception within implies least. Comprehension implies ones potential to increase least within most. One cannot comprehend for others; nor does consenting to the suggestions by others increases ones comprehension of perceivable.
only the left...
How could only a left exist without a right and vice versa? What if oneself (choice) can only exist within left/right (balance)? What if others could tempt one with either/both sides to ignore self?
a) Disability implies lack of (dis) sufficient power (able), which tempts one to ignore that nature implies the only power sufficient for each one within.
Why would others suggest "disability"? To distract one from being "re-enabled" aka enabled response, hence wielding the free will of choice to respond to the sufficient power of nature.
b) Those who "read it" (reddit) tend to propagate it. Reasoning about it aka being for or against it, implies propagation of it.
TPTB must hate black folk
a) There can be only one power aka exerting force (inception towards death) for each resisting being within (life).
b) White (pure light) towards black (absence of light) implies exerting force; while spectrum of visible light in-between implies resisting beings.
c) Reasoning (black vs white; hate vs love) tempts one to ignore being in-between (choice) sides (balance).
d) Both suggested theism (the; that) and collectivism (folk) tempt one to ignore self.
e) Necessity (must) aka Latin mustum; Heb. to ferment implies motion (inception towards death) fermenting being (life).
falling meteor
a) Meteor aka META (by means of) + AOROS (to raise)
b) Means aka "course of action"; hence reaction (life) by means of action (inception towards death) aka falling meteor analogy.
c) Meteorite aka META (by means of) + AOROS (to raise) RITE (passage) aka rite of passage aka growth (raise) within loss (fall).
davos
Aka TAUVUS (behind) aka BE (being) HIND (posterior; after). It's called "coming to be" because being (life) comes after origin (inception towards death).
Next to Davos is a river called "Landwasser" (land-water)...a contradiction in terms. Unless...solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death).
a) How could a multiplier (factor) not move (still)?
b) Counting time tempts one to ignore being "now". Why? Because one can only be now (life)...not before (inception) or after (death). Whenever implies now.
c) Only nature gives (inception) and takes (death)...life within only receives what is offered. Taking (want) or adapting to given (need) implies once again ones free will of choice.
tl; dr: even throwing words together randomly reveals behavior of sound underneath...unless ignored.