a) Consenting to Sub (under) + Scribe (notary; public writer) + Time (particular duration) tempts one to ignore being DUR (durable aka enabled to endure) ATION (action) aka a life sentence, not formed by letters, but as resistance within velocity, hence not under, but centered within surrounding.
b) NO'TARY, noun - "a clerk, a personal secretary; person whose vocation was making notes or memoranda of the acts of others who wished to preserve them, and writing up deeds and contracts"...ones consent to the suggestions of others implies the written contract (letters inscribed within ones mind), which permits others to makes notes (mark; token) within ones mind/memory.
Consent implies one choosing want (suggested) over need (perceivable); hence ones wish to preserve suggested fiction; while ignoring that perceivable reality cannot be preserved by growth (life) struggling to sustain self within loss (inception towards death).
holocaust ... the holocaust
The former implies status quo of being caust (life) within holo (inception towards death) aka burned offering; while the latter implies those consenting to suggested the-ism, thereby permitting others to define; redefine and contradict "holocaust" at will, until consent is being withdrawn.
To be caust (caustic; corrosive; to wear away) implies survivor (to remain alive) within holo (whole) aka temporary growth (life) within whole loss (inception towards death).
Only self discernment will establish comprehension thereof within oneself, while anything suggested by others will tempt one to ignore self discernment.
tl; dr: Resisting spectacle (suggested) allows special (perception) within common (perceivable) to express self; to sustain self; to discern self...
Consenting to suggested aka mercantilism (buy + sell) aka religion (Latin religio; to bind anew) aka masons of free will utilizing bricks (suggested information) and mortar (ones consent) to build walls of ignorance within others etc.
That's glue. Meanwhile...natural order (inception towards death) sets free (life); so no matter how sticky the temporary problems; nature implies the ongoing solution.
tl; dr: want tempts sticky fingers; need can't be held onto...it's ones free will of choice.
a) How could a multiplier (factor) not move (still)?
b) Counting time tempts one to ignore being "now". Why? Because one can only be now (life)...not before (inception) or after (death). Whenever implies now.
c) Only nature gives (inception) and takes (death)...life within only receives what is offered. Taking (want) or adapting to given (need) implies once again ones free will of choice.
tl; dr: even throwing words together randomly reveals behavior of sound underneath...unless ignored.
a) Consenting to Sub (under) + Scribe (notary; public writer) + Time (particular duration) tempts one to ignore being DUR (durable aka enabled to endure) ATION (action) aka a life sentence, not formed by letters, but as resistance within velocity, hence not under, but centered within surrounding.
b) NO'TARY, noun - "a clerk, a personal secretary; person whose vocation was making notes or memoranda of the acts of others who wished to preserve them, and writing up deeds and contracts"...ones consent to the suggestions of others implies the written contract (letters inscribed within ones mind), which permits others to makes notes (mark; token) within ones mind/memory.
Consent implies one choosing want (suggested) over need (perceivable); hence ones wish to preserve suggested fiction; while ignoring that perceivable reality cannot be preserved by growth (life) struggling to sustain self within loss (inception towards death).
The former implies status quo of being caust (life) within holo (inception towards death) aka burned offering; while the latter implies those consenting to suggested the-ism, thereby permitting others to define; redefine and contradict "holocaust" at will, until consent is being withdrawn.
To be caust (caustic; corrosive; to wear away) implies survivor (to remain alive) within holo (whole) aka temporary growth (life) within whole loss (inception towards death).
Only self discernment will establish comprehension thereof within oneself, while anything suggested by others will tempt one to ignore self discernment.
tl; dr: Resisting spectacle (suggested) allows special (perception) within common (perceivable) to express self; to sustain self; to discern self...
But that doesn't work when you take into account glue
Consenting to suggested aka mercantilism (buy + sell) aka religion (Latin religio; to bind anew) aka masons of free will utilizing bricks (suggested information) and mortar (ones consent) to build walls of ignorance within others etc.
That's glue. Meanwhile...natural order (inception towards death) sets free (life); so no matter how sticky the temporary problems; nature implies the ongoing solution.
tl; dr: want tempts sticky fingers; need can't be held onto...it's ones free will of choice.
Would that still be a factor when we people the buildings whenever? Don't mistake it gooses the pot
a) How could a multiplier (factor) not move (still)?
b) Counting time tempts one to ignore being "now". Why? Because one can only be now (life)...not before (inception) or after (death). Whenever implies now.
c) Only nature gives (inception) and takes (death)...life within only receives what is offered. Taking (want) or adapting to given (need) implies once again ones free will of choice.
tl; dr: even throwing words together randomly reveals behavior of sound underneath...unless ignored.