How about this? Only oneself needs to represent perceivable reality; while anything suggested by others implies fiction for self. If one contemplates if others are or aren't real, then one ignores reality (perceivable) for fiction (suggested).
As for most...perceivable implies most; each ones perception within implies least. Comprehension implies ones potential to increase least within most. One cannot comprehend for others; nor does consenting to the suggestions by others increases ones comprehension of perceivable.
only the left...
How could only a left exist without a right and vice versa? What if oneself (choice) can only exist within left/right (balance)? What if others could tempt one with either/both sides to ignore self?
How about this? Only oneself needs to represent perceivable reality; while anything suggested by others implies fiction for self. If one contemplates if others are or aren't real, then one ignores reality (perceivable) for fiction (suggested).
As for most...perceivable implies most; each ones perception within implies least. Comprehension implies ones potential to increase least within most. One cannot comprehend for others; nor does consenting to the suggestions by others increases ones comprehension of perceivable.
How could only a left exist without a right and vice versa? What if oneself (choice) can only exist within left/right (balance)? What if others could tempt one with either/both sides to ignore self?