Signal is centralized
a) Notice that a center (perception) receives signals from circumference (perceivable).
b) Could there be different centers (life) within same circumference (inception towards death)?
c) Can a receiver (perception) differentiate between eminent signal (suggestion) and common signal (perceivable)?
outlaw farming
a) Farmer (German Bauer) aka Rothschild/Bauer are suggesting laws, which puts all those consenting IN, and those suggesting OUT.
b) Natural L(and) A(air) W(ater) forces (inception towards death) resistance (life); while suggested laws tempt one to follow...otherwise law enforcement makes resistance futile.
c) FARM; noun (Latin firma) - "fixed payment"...if one pays consent to those who sell suggestions, then the suggested gets affixed within ones mind.
a) Omni (inception towards death) potency (life), hence ones potential of growth within all.
b) VORE (Latin vorare) - "to devour"; which implies voraciousness aka ones greed of appetite, while ignoring that loss (inception towards death) devours growth (life).
c) CARNAL - "flesh" implies each physical (life) within all spiritual (inception towards death), which also gushes forth aka flesh/flash.
Hence the hub of porn being a merchant of temptation...baiting others to get hooked. The chosen one also gets charged through all the frequency of resistance ignored by those getting hooked on bait.
Porn; from pornē - "prostitute" originally "bought, purchased"
a) As long as many buy into (consent) what few sell (suggestion); so long will many prostitute themselves to few.
b) Prostitute aka PRO (before) STATUERE (cause to stand, establish) aka perceivable as the cause of ones established perception. Those who prostitute themselves to others, ignore being the statuere (life) within that which came before (inception towards death).
tl; dr: Buying into; sells one out to others, hence getting fucked like a cheap ass hooker. Ones consent (buy) to anything suggested (sell) implies the hook on the bait.
burned books" is evidently vital to (((them)))
a) Amazon "kindle"
b) BOOK (bound together; to bind) aka RELIGION (Latin religio; to bind together) aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) etc.
Meanwhile...procession from heat (inception) towards cold (death) implies a setting apart (life) from one another.
c) If many consent to be dispensable, then few remain vital...
beliefs of Arabia
ARABIA (Hebrew arabha) - "desert" aka DESERT - "to leave, abandon" aka DE (undo) SERERE (join together)...all beliefs tempt one to join together with another.
Now add ISLAM (surrender)...did Arabia surrender to suggested beliefs?
a) Cube aka body with(in) six square faces (front; back; left; right; up; down) aka ones perception within all perceivable.
b) Suggesting others to circle a cube, as to distract from ones position within implies "rolling the dice". Plural (dice) distracts from singular (die)...
c) Covered outside (ignorance) and mysterious inside (discernment)...very few have seen inside, yet many wish to enter.
"Best selling author says" + "argued last year in his book" + "available on Amazon"
Buy my book; goys...
alchemists and occultists
If -ist implies ones consent to suggested -ism; then that implies an alchemical process concealing (occult) something...
to turn base...into
Does baseline (inception towards death) generating waveform (life) imply a "turning into"? To turn implies "to cause to move in a circular course", yet inception towards death implies linear...can you explain how life turns within linear procession?
Them and stones...
a) CONCRETION, noun - "the process by which soft or fluid bodies become thick, consistent, solid or hard; the act of growing together, or of uniting, by other natural process, the small particles of matter into a mass"
b) Now compare "fluid to solid by growing together" with fluid (inception towards death) to solid (life) by setting apart...
c) Why would few worship "e pluribus unum" (out of many; one)? What's the difference between matter into mass concretion and mass migration?
d) Could a mason of free (will of choice) utilize ingredients like bricks (suggested information) and mortar (ones consent) to build?
Nice; found within the same dictionary... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/last
This is where self discernment comes into it...because there's only one origin and each one within "next" aka preceding within order. The deception...suggested "present" tempts one to ignore perceivable as presented to ones perception. There's no "before the present"; only presented towards being.
As for most...whole implies most; each partial implies least. Others suggest partial to compare each other within a conflict of reason (most vs least). That conflict doesn't exist for least (life) within most (inception towards death)...unless willingly consented to as choice and through ignorance/denial.
Notice also that life doesn't "last"...
a) L'AST, adjective - "that follows all the others; beyond which there is no more"
b) Wanted temptation implies ignoring needed resistance. If one chooses want over need, then one enters a want vs don't want conflict of reason; both sides of which diminish ones resistance.
c) Falling for suggested tempts one to ignore being (life) within fall (inception towards death).
From a bible perspective (Genesis 3): Ignoring fall of man (perceivable) by falling for other men (suggested) implies temptation.
It clearly wasn't your last...also still no mic; no social media accounts; no telephones; and too much discernment to fall for temptations.
it's up to one to believe
To believe implies ones consent to another ones suggestion. Can you show me a belief that isn't build upon suggestion?
...or not
OR implies origin. NOT (Latin nihilo, nothing) implies ones denial of perceivable origin.
Humanity no doubt is a whole
a) Human aka HUE (color) of man implies within visible spectrum of light, with light implying the origin aka the whole for each partial within.
b) DOUBT, verb - "waver; fluctuation in opinion" implies the status quo of being a wave-form; fluctuation within light. Others suggest belief; trust; faith; truth etc. as the inversion of doubt, hence tricking one to hold onto something affixed while ignoring everything moving.
we are all connected
If singular (one) consents to suggested pluralism (we) a connection; bond; contract is being made. Also; the opposite of all (whole) implies each one (partial)...not we (partials put together).
Only within connection (inception towards death) can there be separation (life). Others tempt one to ignore separation for re-connection aka mixing together to destroy partials.
In order to function as a whole
Whole implies natural order; partials within imply chaos; struggling to sustain self within order. Only then can those within establish chaos without harming order.
Function implies FUNCOR (to perfom) TION (action) aka reacting form within enacting flow. So being implies partial function within order of whole.
It doesn't matter how many partials come together...they can never be a whole, because each partial already exist within whole. Nature is already complete; nobody within can add anything to it, only draw from it to transmute within it.
need different
Consider the opposite...different want (life) within same need (inception towards death), which implies ones need to resist want as to be able to sustain self.
So is being an individual actually a division or just being part of the whole?
How could partials come to be without "internal" division of whole? The trick to deceive one from comprehending this is suggested dualism (two). Whole doesn't divide into two, but remains oneness (whole) for each one (partial) within.
There is no TWO in nature, only ONE whole aka energy (internal/inherent power). If energy implies one, that what does two imply? Two energy? What does more energy imply to energy itself? Once again it's the opposite...each one within all energy implies less than origin provides, which only then allows each ones growth.
Ask yourself about the origin of "two"...does two exist without oneself counting other ones as two? Show me any two things and I will describe how each one is only discernible from one another; because each one exist at a different position from one another, hence within/during/in-between ongoing differentiation aka natural order aka momentum (inception towards death) of motion.
we should be
Show me the being "we"...
want to be punk rock so you only hang out with other punk rock kids.
So what happens if one of the kids also does jazz; pop; hip-hop and gospel? How many labels (pluralism) does one (singular) need to satisfy wants?
These are false identities and not actually anything to do with who someone is at the core.
Yet so is "identity aka identical aka same", because each one is different from one another. Core (perception) also implies within periphery (perceivable)...suggestions like identitarianism corrupts core.
Core (life) moves within periphery (inception towards death)...identity implies an affixed label slapped onto core.
In my mind an ideal humanity wouldn't need others to tell them their likes or needs but each person would know what they each like and who they are.
Which requires each ones self discernment as choice in-between balance (need/want)...as opposed to imbalance (want vs not want or would vs wouldn't).
Sleight of hand: William Tell aka I am free will of choice (will-i-am) uttering words (tell)... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Tell
followed one's passions
PAS'SION, noun (Latin passio, from patior, to suffer) - "the impression or effect of an external agent upon a body" aka being (life) within passion (inception towards death); also passion of christ (anointed one).
One needs to resist the temptation/passion of wanting to follow...others tempt one to follow suggested, while ignoring to resist perceivable.
PASS (passage) ION (action) aka ones passage within action.
afraid to do what they love
Fear implies towards suggested outcomes; while ignoring perceivable origin. Love implies versus hate aka a conflict of reason shaped by ones consent to suggested moralism.
unfulfilling
That implies wanting to be filled; while ignoring needing to resist stuffing self, while within procession. Filling self leads to constipation (a pressing together); letting go of constipation within procession leads to relief.
self worth
Being implies evaluation (perception) within value (perceivable)...others suggest worth to corrupt ones evaluation, and if one consents, then others are permitted to devalue ones evaluation.
Value implies within motion (inspiration); suggested worth tempts one to hold onto it (information)...filling oneself with information constipates self, while tempting one to ignore perceivable inspiration.
being forced on people is separation
Few suggest many to amalgamate; mix; come together etc. which tempts each consenting one to ignore being a partial within a moving whole. Natural order forces separation (inception to life) and unification (life to death)...beings within natural order suggest unification (coming together) to distract from separation (being apart) and ones consent to that suggestion binds one together with others.
Like for example being part of a punk rock band/bind/bund or religion (Latin religion; to bind anew) etc.
Why do people only need to hang out with others just like them?
It's ones consent to suggested pluralism (them; people); which tempts one to ignore that that each one person is different from one another.
I have never understood the group mentality
Understand aka "standing under" the suggestions of others when consenting to follow...group mentality.
Until humans start valuing ones own true identity I believe we will be out of balance.
Which implies self discernment aka something one cannot get through suggestions by others. Also; one cannot be out of balance; since being implies center (choice) of balance (need/want). It's ignorance/denial which imbalances self (want vs not want), while ignoring being within balance (need/want).
The conflict (reason) only exist within ones mind, because one willingly chooses to hold onto it. Others cannot release that hold, but it's super easy to tempt others to keep holding onto, hence a few merchants of temptations tricking many to hold onto all kinds of shit.
Thanks for inspiring me to write this btw. Great post.
liberal
Liberal implies free (liber) within all (al)...using ones free will of choice to consent to suggested labels upon all perceivable, binds one to another.
fictitious group
a) All suggested groups (plural) are fictitious, because each one (singular) within has to first ignore perceivable reality to be part of it.
b) PLU'RAL, adjective (Latin pluralis, from plus, pluris, more.]...being implies ones (partial) within oneness (whole), and so there cannot be more than one, for all is one in energy.
Tell me...what could be more than energy (internal/inherent power)?
new...alternative...conservative
a) Alternation (inception towards death) prevents conservation (life)...hence ones struggle to sustain self.
b) New (inception) and old (death) implies in and out of same alternation.
conflicting beliefs
To belief implies ones consent (want or not want) to a suggestion by another, which establishes conflicts of reason (want vs not want). From a different perspective...to believe implies holding onto something, while to be implies moving within everything. Ignoring cause shapes conflicts among effects.
reconcile
RECONCI'LE, verb - "to call back that which has been alienated". Being implies alienation (life) within unity (inception towards death)...only nature calls back that which has been alienated.
RE (response to) CONCILIO; CALO (call; to drive; to strain or force out sound).
Take your Thorazine
Aka "An order in which individuals are "adjusted" to fit the requirements of the system and those outside the system are seen as pathological or bad" ~Ted Kaczynski
The Democrat Party culture believes...the elite jews who own the media believe...I believe
If all those are one the same side (believers); then who are the disbelievers in opposition?
I believe in the Punisher's attitude
Aren't the many getting punished for consenting to what the few suggest them? Aren't the few claiming persecution and unlawful death of love ones as justification for revenge? Who is more free in uttering real sentiments (FRANK)...few or many? Who lives in a CASTLE, while holding others within cast systems...few or many?
Frank Castle aka Francis Castiglione aka free (francis) partial (castig aka kastro) little (li) one implies ones free will of choice.
theological sources
a) Theological implies ones consent to suggested the-ism (authority of others), and the resulting conflict of reason (logic) about the suggested authority (belief vs disbelief; good vs bad; true vs false etc.)
b) There can be only one source (whole) for each resolution (partials) within. It's ones consent to suggestions by another one, which establishes multiple sources. Others deliberately suggest pluralism (we) to distract singular (one) from discerning self.
another name for
a) Only among resolutions can there be one and "another" one...there can be no "another" source.
b) "for" implies forwards, hence being (life) responding within solution (inception towards death) aka re-solution.
c) Nature doesn't utilize NOUN (combination of sounds)...it is the sound (entire) which sets itself apart into each partial instrument within.
Those within nature suggest noun (word) to distract instrument of perception from perceivable sound. Furthermore; suggested nouns (names; numbers, brands; idols; definitions etc.) tempt the suggestion of adjectives (something attributed to a noun).
This is how a few suggest a noun (jew) to trick many to add endless adjectives to it...works like a charm upon ones mind, hence enchantment.
d) Nature moves, so only verbs (denoting action) carry the message of origin. No matter how much nouns and adjectives are used to conceal motion, any verb denotes; indicates; expresses motion.
commandment
Command (to order; to direct; to charge) implies natural order (inception towards death) directing and charging each partial mind (life) within; chaos implies mixing input aka suggested commands tempt one to follow; perceivable command inspires ones resistance.
ten
Aka 1 (one) and 0 (none). There can be only one aka partials (ones) within whole (oneness). None implies suggested nihilism (Latin nihilo; nothing) and ones consent to de-nial perceivable for it.
Resisting nouns takes both names and numbers out of ones mind/memory...jews rule names and numbers, while none else can make a name for self or become number one.
kabbalist
-ist (kabbalist) implies ones consent to suggested -ism (kabbalism), hence Latin cabbala; Hebrew qabbalah; from qibbel "to receive, admit, accept".
Ones choice implies quibbel in-between -ist (consent) and -ism (suggestion).
Nature doesn't require acceptance...it forces adaptation.
a) Race (Latin raddix; radius; ray) implies through one outwards...not which out group one chooses to be part of. Being also implies center (perception) of surrounding (perceivable), hence radius radiating outwards into circumference through ones senses.
Inception towards death implies LINE, hence lineage for each living radius within. Sleight of hand: "race to the bottom line".
b) To control implies to restrain; being implies "free" will of choice; hence being free within STRAIN (to stretch). Inception towards death implies the stretch; the life within the free will of choice, momentarily unrestrained.
In other words...only if nature is in control can those within be free to choose, yet what is it that those within nature choose? More control over each other.
c) "division by groups" implies a divided one (partial within whole) joining with other ones into a group. This is called collectivism; it's being suggested by few to tempt many together, while nature continuous to divide everything (whole) into each thing (partials).
To make this more simple...off-spring implies division from another, not joining with another.
Notice that all those who want to join into groups, afterwards try desperately to stand out from all the others...like wearing a uniform to be part of a group; just to do anything to get promotions over others.
d) Character implies a mark made upon form, hence an engraving of characteristics into malleable form within a flowing system. The initial division implies from flow (whole) into form (partials)...the "character" marks are made afterwards.
Sleight of hand: "people always tell me; you're quite a character"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQnaRtNMGMI
Yeah but it's a division
BUT implies that you have an issue with division; yet YEAH implies versus NAY aka a conflict of reason (agree vs disagree) aka a division against one another.
If one grows self discernment as partial within whole, then there's no BUT (except; besides; unless) to whole. Sleight of hand...BUTT-HOLE. Many are making themselves the but-end of a joke the few suggested them to play on each other.
Satan's chosen
a) SATAN from root s-t-n "one who opposes"
b) Ones choice as resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death) implies oppose (need) or permit (want).
I believe he is right about every individual should be judged by their character....I believe people are intentionally being divided.
Individual implies within division. It's your beliefs which contradict your state of being.
the important thing to keep in mind
a) What if importing and keeping what others are suggesting leads to a whole lot of people believing in the end times?
b) What if import (buy) export (sell) is a merchants game?
c) What if im-port and ex-port tempt one into a H'ARBOR, noun- "a lodging; a place of entertainment and rest" aka into a port?
d) What if memory/mind can be tempted to ignore impress for import? What if pressing implies pressure going through memory; while Latin porto implies carrying things within memory?
e) Do the elderly behave as if they could keep what's in their memory or does dying teach living the need to let go? Ever notice the relief of letting go of constipation within procession?
a) Suggested creationism (out of nothing) tempts one to ignore perceivable transmutation (within everything).
b) Ones consent to suggested creationism turns ones mind/memory into a DOLLAR/DALER/THALER/THOLOS - "vault" and VAULT/VOLTA - "to turn". Memory needs to adapt to procession of inspiration; wanting to fill it up like a vault with information corrupts memory.
c) Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see:
"Freundeskreis reist und bringt den Virus wie Fernfahrer...immer wenn es regnet zähl'n wir Sterntaler"