Yes. It's an illusion all of it. Since the early 2010's there has been ever more control through illusory narratives.

Online, they create the demographics themselves and then can label them as they please and can also change the labels, the conditions, the exclusivity and the variance in all manner of parameters to narrow or widen the demographics 'appearances' (these are not representation of anything other than their models)

They identify those who are most adamant about topics and then silo them for particular advertising. Reddit was the first major model of this and then after a while the social media companies all adopted it. Hence why Reddit was taken over. It was a perfect strategy to start the effect.

Each subreddit (including this place technically by the model) is give its own sub-moderators and the master admins can still do as please.

The goal is to voluntarily segment through association and this way you label yourselves with the ⭐ and then make their job easier. So when they have and campaigns that are political they can focus on the various subs.

This was the first implementation but it's been refined so many times since then that it has become almost a game. They decided that after a while, this made it to easy to reverse engineer because it could be used against them. The original conspiracy sub was great until they realised it was not only isolating but allowing them to rally. They realised this after occupy Wall Street.

Since then, they have done all they can to break up the very chambers but do so in a way that appears like you are surrounded by your peers.

They did this by focusing on hate subs because those are divisive in nature and align only around hate but not solution.

Once a solution narrative starts to form within a sub that they do not like, they will moderate it and either shutter the community causing essentially mass displacement of a culture, and they then erase all mention of it, and using the very culture itself, they reverse engineer the new blocks and implement checks and balances to ensure that the community is eradicated.

Then they replace the narrative with their own controlled version which has a twisted take on the actual culture. They use this to paint a picture for those outside the actual community to perceive, all the while Maki g sure that the real community is never allowed to grow.

They do this on both sides. But they allow whatever side is beneficial at the time. For example. They use the right wing for corporate tax breaks (not personal taxes or property ever) and they use the left for social control under the guise of protection.

Yeah, the pro-war, anti-free speech alone is crazy.

You would think more liberals would take heed, but they try to keep those guys in la la land, if you know what I am saying. Rose-colored glasses and whatnot.

If a liberal from the 1970’s time travelled to today and saw the state of the American Left, they’d be aghast.

They’re communists

British military intelligence figured out what the Democrats' hot-button issues were, built movements around them, bought out all of the Democrats' online organizing tools and most of their campaign staff, then ran Russian and Islamist propaganda through them while telling everyone that they were working in national security and that they had to enforce these stupid narratives on an unwilling public. The online Left of ActBlue and MoveOn are actual paid Russian agents and many of them are also Hamas pretending to be Communists.

We have teachers that graduated common cote now teaching common core. Parents of kids graduated common core. Too stupid to see that they're just stupid.

All I know is I used to lean left because I was against all those things. My friends who I thought were independent thinkers mostly did too, usually further left than I. I feel they changed but maybe I was a fool and they were just NPCs waiting for a new download. I do think the left was intentionally hijacked and targeted but it doesn't take responsibility away from the individuals. I am still convinced something happened online or something that could effect a large mass of people in 2017 to 2018 ish that reprogrammed people. That or I jumped to a parallel universe or some shit cause the world went crazy then.

actually, the day after the DNC coronated $hillary was when shit took a noticeable turn for the worse. it was like a switch was flipped. crazy AF & depressing as hell to live in real-time. the dems/libs that went along with $hillary just kept getting bat-shittier and bat-shittier. the demographic i was very much a part of in 2015 was entirely unrecognizable by 2018. probably lost 95% of my circle of friends/acquaintances because i wouldn't go along with the crazy.

liberal

Liberal implies free (liber) within all (al)...using ones free will of choice to consent to suggested labels upon all perceivable, binds one to another.

fictitious group

a) All suggested groups (plural) are fictitious, because each one (singular) within has to first ignore perceivable reality to be part of it.

b) PLU'RAL, adjective (Latin pluralis, from plus, pluris, more.]...being implies ones (partial) within oneness (whole), and so there cannot be more than one, for all is one in energy.

Tell me...what could be more than energy (internal/inherent power)?