Africa/frica/frigus - "cold"...
How about this...where does word got meaning from?
changing the meaning of words
a) Change implies sound...words tempt one to ignore that.
b) Mean/meien/middle - "intermediary"...meaning implies middle of where? Also notice...media/medium/middle.
manufactured consent
a) Manufacture implies "manual work", while work implies automatic aka auto (inception towards death) matic (life).
b) Consent implies send together...being implies send apart from one another.
Consenting to a suggestion by another puts that which nature sets apart back together.
manipulates language
Language aka speech implies "fictitious articulation within natural sound"
- RA'DIATE, verb - "to issue and proceed in direct lines from a point"
a) Ones consent to a suggested "nuclear explosion" establishes a point of impact from which further suggestions radiate.
b) Being implies as life "sentence" directed from inception towards "point" of death...few suggest points to tempt many to ignore sentence.
All suggested progressivism points towards death of life sentence...if consented to.
nothing to fear
a) Fear implies towards outcome; being implies within, out of, and in response to origin.
b) Suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing) tempts one to de-nial everything perceivable.
c) Few suggest "nothing" to tempt many to ignore "everything"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQnaRtNMGMI
Our masters know
a) If singular (one) consents to suggested pluralism (our), then one enslaves self, while permitting another as master.
b) KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists"....not the suggestions by another about perceivable. Few suggest understanding to tempt many to "stand-under"...hence slave standing under master willingly.
If you had any will power at all then what makes you believe it was free or freely exercised?
a) Believing implies ones consent by free will of choice to a suggestion by the free will of choice of another. Belief contradicts will, hence religion (Latin religo; to bind anew).
b) Power implies "to exert force" aka an emission (life) thrust forwards (inception towards death). For an emission to have potential it requires each ones free will of choice to adapt (need) or ignore (want) all power.
c) If...believe
Believing anything suggested establishes a conflict of reason (agree vs disagree; true vs false; belief vs disbelief etc.)...doing that tempts one to ignore perceivable implication (if/then).
Reason contradicts implication.
d) Had/have implies taking possession/holding onto something...power moves and cannot be held onto; hence the emissions within being FREE will of choice.
It's the suggested rhetoric many are reasoning over, which tempts each one to diminish potential against one another.
e) MAKE, verb - "to compel; to constrain" also contradicts being FREE will of choice. Only nature makes (inception towards death) re-makes (life), hence each one within re-sponding to being made aka to coming into being.
From where or from who did you receive will power?
a) FREE will of choice implies within DOMinance of balance, since only within balance can there be choice. What does balance imply? Motion! Hence motion to momentum (balance) to matter (choice).
All of this can be discerned by each one within...unless willingly ignored.
b) RECE'IVE, verb (Latin recipio; re, respond to and capio, to take)...the RE in receive implies ones free will of choice aka ones response-ability, while taking implies ones free will of choice of want (taking suggested) over need (adapting to perceivable).
c) Who implies person aka per sonos (by sound). Sound sets itself apart into each instrument (within structured mind). Being implies frequency within spectrum of sound, hence being set free within balance aka resonance (need) or dissonance (want).
Few suggest words to distract many from perceivable sound, which implies spell-craft.
To take implies to hold onto/take possession thereof...one cannot hold onto perceivable (inspiration); only onto suggested (information).
Nature isn't for the taking...it moves through each one and needs to be adapted to aka drawn inspiration from. Others utilize suggestion to tempt one to consent aka to take information into ones mind/memory.
The selection from a limited number of choices can easily be manipulated
Thinking like that already implies the manipulation in effect. Being implies ones selecting choice (perception) within all balance (perceivable)...the suggested choices by others imbalance ones choice if consented to.
Chosen ones implies selected by ones choice, hence French élite - "selection; choice".
Choice doesn't need to select among suggested choices; it needs to adapt to perceivable balance, hence balancing as choice, while needing to resist the wanted temptation of suggested choices.
Any choice suggested tempts one off-balance, hence towards choosing a side within a conflict of reason. Few control both sides of every conflict many consent to, because few suggest both sides.
Choice within balance implies center within circumference; jews erect at center, while cutting gentiles off circumference, which implies a circumcision ritual.
Center (perception) within circumference (perceivable) can be tempted off-center through suggestion.
to offer you two choices
a) Only nature offers all (perceivable) towards each one (perception)...any other "offer" implies a merchant of temptation establishing a contract between selling (suggestion) and buying (consent). That's a burned offering if consented to...
b) Oneness (whole) generates ones (partials)...other ones suggest one to count, and ones consent to another ones suggestion implies dual-ism aka dual/duo/two.
Nature implies "one for all and all for one" aka "there can be only one" aka "alone...all(in)one".
Two does not exist within nature unless ONE ignores all perceivable for another ONEs suggestion.
two choices that work to your own detriment.
Because TWO tempts ONE to ignore self for another.
If you have no power over your limited choices
NO implies suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing) and if one consents by free will of choice, then one de-nials everything perceivable for suggested nothing.
Consent limits ones choice by selecting the suggested choices from another one...a chosen one.
It took ones ignorance/denial of all power to empower another one, while depriving oneself.
how much will are you freely exercising
a) Exercise implies work (Greek energy) - "internal/inherent power". Each ones free will of choice implies center of energy expressing outwards. How much thereof is expressed implies each ones free will of choice.
b) Energy implies ONE, for all is one in energy; which implies how much can be within energy...each one.
between a few bad choices?
Being implies as choice in-between balance (need/want); while suggested choices tempts one in-between imbalance (want vs not want aka good vs bad).
If one finds self in-between a good vs bad conflict of reason, then that's because one already consented by free will of choice to suggested moralism. That's self confinement, and neither can another get one out of self confinement; nor can choosing sides from suggested choices get one out of ignorance.
esoteric knowledge
Aka all perceivable (exo) generating each ones perception (eso)...a spreading/stratum/ledge of known.
a blend of different
Nature differentiates itself from whole (same) into each partial (different)...difference (perception) within sameness (perceivable) can be tempted to respond alike (suggested).
In short...nature sets apart; few within tempt many together, while remaining apart.
spiritual aspect
A spec/specio/special/partial (life) within whole (inception towards death) needs to breathe (Latin spiro; spirit) aka expression (temporary growth) adapting to impression (ongoing loss).
Suggested spiritualism tempts one to ignore that; while permitting others to breathe life into the definition (idolatry); redefinition (revisionism) and contradiction (talmudic reasoning) of any -ISM, which implies FIAT (authoritative sanction aka let it be done).
being curated
a) CURATE; noun - "responsible for the spiritual welfare of those in his charge"...re-charge (life) within charge (inception towards death) implies breathing (Latin spiro; spirit) as will/well during fare.
b) Consenting to the suggestions of another implies a wager between layman and curator aka a mortgage pledge.
- Center (ones choice) and Circumference (chosen ones)
- Bank (chosen ones suggestion) and Trust (ones consent)
Banking trust permits control of center from circumference, which in return is utilized to cut circumference off center aka circumcision.
Are Aliens really Demons?
a) Re-al implies ones RE-sponse to ALL perceivable...anything suggested by another tempts one to ignore that, hence establishing fiction.
b) Few suggest...
- ALIEN - "a creature from outer space; extraterrestrial"
- DEMON - "an evil spirit; devil or fiend"
...to tempt many to ignore perceivable...
- ALIEN (Latin alius) - "another"
- DEMON (Greek dai-mon) - "divider; provider"
All provides itself by dividing into each one among another.
c) The aforementioned can only be discerned by oneself and not gained by consenting to the suggested information by another. Asking others "ARE" tempts one to ignore that the root thereof implies "to be", hence being oneself.
Are...actually
If "are" implies being, and being implies reaction to all, then "actually" contradicts being reactionary.
Two suggested words are enough to invert ones perception of reality...if consented to.
in the UK Parliament
In the "almost empty" UK Parliament (assembly)...
TPTB can not lose.
Power implies loss (inception towards death); being implies growth (life)...suggested theism (the) and determinism (that) tempts one to ignore that.
completely rigged
Rigging/shrouding implies covering up...all perceivable cannot be covered up; each ones perception within can hide under the cover of suggested if consented to.
completely...every aspect
COMPLETE, adjective - "having no deficiency"...each aspect/spec/special/partial implies a deficit.
Few suggest "every" to distract "each" one of many from discerning self, and ones consent to suggested implies COM (together; with) establishing CON (against) aka con-flicts of reason.
act nears full circle
a) Action implies whole; circle implies each partial reaction within.
b) Opposite of full implies empty aka at leisure aka "free at one's disposal"; hence free will of choice within dominance of balance implying FREE (empty) DOM (full).
tesla leader
a) TESLA - "unit of magnetic flux density"
b) Being implies magnetic (life) within electric (inception towards death); hence ones struggle within the need to resist wanted temptations.
c) Few suggest leaders to tempt many to follow by consent, which establishes a density of magnetic (life) within flux (inception towards death).
d) Density restricts FREE will of choice, hence ones consent to suggestions, permitting another to bulk consent aka banking trust.
advisory role
Few suggest roles (part one takes) to tempt each one of many to ignore being "a part" within whole and "apart" from one another.
reclaim the white
White implies pure light, which sets itself apart into a visible spectrum of color for each ray within...any claim establishes black (absence of light) within one, hence lack of self discernment.
slowly becoming worthless
Coming (inception towards death) to be (life) implies steady value generating loose evaluation.
In other words...value (motion) generates evaluation (matter), which choosing to hold onto value devalues.
- VALUE (perceivable)
- EVALUATION (perception)
- DEVALUATION (suggested)
anthem
Anthem (Latin antiphona) - "opposing sound"...hence offering incentives by words (suggestion) to distract from sound (perception).
helping patients make the choice
Patients/patience (Latin patientia) - "suffering or enduring; submission; indulgence, leniency; humility; submissiveness"
PATI (to endure)...the opposite of endure implies bypass aka being (life) by passing (inception towards death).
Choice implies resistance...patience tempts choice to submit to temptation.
Kill them or nothing will change.
Who "killed" Jacob Rothschild?
I cant explain why I get so butthurt over this.
Because being implies behind origin...if others distort ones origin; then one feels "butthurt" about that.
Suggested rhetoric like "explain" puts EX (life) before PLAIN (inception towards death), hence inverting origin with outcome.
In the old thread, where the truth was coming out
A "thread" implies a twisting together; while "coming out" implies out of origin; hence a setting apart.
most people did not care
If nature charges, then those within imply re-charge aka response to being charged. If many don't care about being charged or recharging, then few can use the remaining charge of many as a battery...that's the foundation of democracy aka demos (common people) kratos (strength).
They destroyed people like kevin annett for his quest for...
If form (life) within flow (inception towards death) seeks (quest) forwards (for); then it destroys itself.
How to change the narrative
Narration (suggested) tempts one to ignore change (perceivable)...
Oct 7h
Domestication through frequency of repetition... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yshJn7lgVsY
What's your take?
The purpose of domestication through frequency of repetition aka ones consent to TAKE the suggested information. Perceivable inspiration cannot be taken, no matter how hard one tries to hold onto it.
jews have dropped the ball
a) Consenting to suggested THE-ism implies BA'AL (taking possession of). It's gentiles dropping on their knees when taking the suggestions by a jew.
https://www.etymonline.com/word/Baal#etymonline_v_158
b) BALL implies being (life) within all (inception towards death).
Sleight of hand: "Ball Point Pen" aka penning point of death for being within all. Look into László József Bíró (born László József Schweiger) who snatched the patent for the first ball point pen.
a) Form (life) within flow (inception towards death)...
b) Mud implies matter within motion; hence motion moving matter.
They used the word distemper often.
DISTEMPER, noun - "disproportionate mixture of parts"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/distemper
Being implies partial within whole, hence a setting apart...those within tempt each other together, hence few collectivizing many...e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka miscegenation; multiculturalism; melting pot; mass migration aka united states; united nations; united kingdom; soviet union; european union aka uniformity; university; unicode; unisex; universal pictures; universal basic income; universal studios etc.
John Wycliff
In 1345, a man by the name of Wycliffe in England thought that it was time to translate the Bible into English. There was no English edition of the Bible because who the Devil could read? It was only the educated church people who could read Latin and Greek, Syriac, Aramaic and the other languages.
Anyhow, Wycliffe translated the Bible into English. But in it, he had to look around for some words for Judaeas and Judaius. There was no English word because Judea had passed out of existence. There was no Judea. People had long ago forgotten that. So in the first translation he used the word, in referring to Jesus, as 'gyu', "jew".
~Benjamin H. Freedman (1961)
To tempt one (life) to follow all (inception towards death)...instead of resisting the temptation thereof. In other words...nature sets itself apart; which establishes temporary matter within ongoing motion aka a struggle to grow within loss; to rise during fall; to live during process of dying.
They didn't make perceivable/pan/all into anything; they suggested progressivism to tempt ones consent to follow the flute.
Edit: entity/esse/es - "to be" implies towards (inception towards death) being (life). One ignores that when consenting to the suggestions of another, hence submitting ones choice to chosen ones suggestion.
Another edit: Think of PAN as sound (Latin sanus) - "entire"...then the flute becomes the words suggested within perceivable sound. The trick of personification is that it distracts one from being per-sonos (by sound).
Why not yet another edit: If pan was shaped out of three P-A-N letters; then are there more letters? If pan implies all; then can there be more than all? That's how a suggested words can invert perceivable sound....if one consents to it.
Jesus truly is...Anointed One...Savior
How does one save by anointing? Each off-spring implies one anointed through oil by mother, and birth doesn't save; it puts one into harms way by setting one free from one another, hence off-spring aka setting apart.
Jesus. The Christ.
Notice that suggested the-ism implies a mediator in-between Jesus and Christ. Ones consent to the suggested binds "Jesus" and "Christ" together, while permitting the mediator to hold one within bondage.
blasphemer
a) Blas (to blame) + pheme (to speak)...suggested words imply an expressed disapprobation of perceivable sound. The latter moves; while the former tempts one to affix (definition) it.
b) BLASPHE'ME, verb (Greek; The first syllable is the same as in blame, blasme, denoting injury; Latin loedo, loesus)... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Blaspheme
Noticed something? Injury aka IOESUS aka IESUS. It's self harm for Christ (to annoint; set apart) to hold onto Jesus (to save; holding onto).
nonsense
What does Christianity (or any other religion) say about "sensing nothing"?
AI generated
Copy + pasting suggested information implies artificial; adapting to perceivable inspiration implies natural.
Can you show me an AI that can adapt to perceivable inspiration?
organized religion
a) Organize implies to form into a whole; religion implies binding together.
b) Being implies formed within whole, hence set free from one another.
Christianity has been corrupted by Jesuits
- CHRIST... to christen implies to set apart aka to anoint.
- JESUS...to save implies holding partials together.
Saving others contradicts being anointed one.
For...I am prepared to suffer
Aka FOR (inception towards death) I (life) am set into order (prepare) to continue (suffer).
Standard implies stationary...hence reasoning (good vs bad) keeping one stationary within the same conflict; no matter which side one chooses.
On the other hand...N(orth) E(ast) W(est) S(outh) implies a setting apart of center from circumference during motion.
Hence alternative instead of standard...
Echo (sound repeated by reflection) tempts one to ignore that sound doesn't repeat...it's those within choosing to alter (resonance) or reflect (dissonance).
Reason implies reflection; implication implies alternation. Reflecting good news vs bad news ad infinitum doesn't alter the conflict; it only destroys those within.
The "passing away" you mentioned above cannot be "stuffed"...it's ones consent which stuffs suggested information by another within ones mind/memory. That's where plenty/pele/to fill originates from.
Letting go of suggested clears ones mind/memory up, while dissolving the conflict of reason (good vs bad).
Rebrand this into "willing consent" and ask yourself at what moment ones free will of choice became "lukewarm"? Notice furthermore that this lukewarm choice was made before the acceptance vs denial conflict came to be.
How could anything not be per-sonos (by sound)? As in SOUND, adjective (Latin sanus) - "entire; whole"...
Getting implies seizing/taking hold of...how could temporary (life) within ongoing (inception towards death) get anything?
Aka forward (pro) motion...how could form (life) within flow (inception towards death) be moved forwards without ignoring something fundamentally crucial?
Aka "turn a mind" aka circular reasoning...