oral tradition...not only writing
Both of which are suggested by another, hence tempting one to ignore "so long as you truly do know God". Knowledge implies perception, not suggestion.
for saying contrarian things
SAY; verb from PIE root sekw - "to follow". Consenting to a suggested saying implies ones consent to follow another, which in return contradicts perceivable.
If one follows perceivable thirst or hunger, then one contradicts being alive, which requires resistance. Notice furthermore that nature doesn't say anything to make one hungry or thirsty, yet it deafens ones senses the longer one ignores to resist.
to simply be different vulgar renditions of the one true religion
Does the one true religion require followers? If so, then why can followers choose to follow vulgar renditions? What empowers choice...following or resisting to follow?
representative of God himself
Doesn't each one re-present aka respond to what is presented by God? How are those within nature not representatives of nature?
Where does this middle-man concept originate from? Why are many voting for representatives among few?
you will feel the love of God wash all over you
Washing (inception towards death) all over you (life)...Love? Hate? A conflict of reason (love vs hate) or simply an implication (if/then)?
what separates the (one perfect) religion of God
a) Religion (Latin religio) - "to bind anew" contradicts separation. Letting go of religion allows one to discern self as partial one (Christ) within whole oneness (God)...without binding self to another.
b) Perfect; noun (Latin perficio) - "to carry to the end" implies motion moving (inception towards death) matter (life).
open to all
What if it's the opposite? All open to each one within?
God’s eyes
If God implies one (singular); then why count eyes (plural)? Where's the plural in the ALL seeing EYE?
samarkand
Samar/shamar - "to keep, watch, preserve" + Kand/kent - "city/center"....center (life) within circumference (inception towards death) cannot be kept...it's about adaptation; not preservation.
- Courtesan Procuress: "Are you gentleman satisfied with our service?"
- Intoxicated Patron: "SA MAR KAND!"
They ramble...
RAM'BLE, verb - "to rove; to wander from place to place, without any determinate object in view"
they fire the next best crazy thing at you
Aka suggesting an object (next best crazy thing) for view (at you).
An eGYPTian aka gypsy aka nomad aka vagabond aka small rootless international clique aka globalist aka jew...can only wander among subjects if goyim fix their minds on objects aka idolatry.
House GOP Leaders
If field nigger are followers and house nigger leaders, then what about the master owning house; field and niggers?
Breaking NEWS
What breaks N(orth) E(ast) W(est) S(outh) apart from one another?
SAY from PIE root sekw - "to follow". Nature generates (inception towards death) resistance (life)...following implies the temptation to ignore resisting. That's why nature (perceivable sound) doesn't say (suggested words) anything.
Sleight of hand: Sound of Silence... https://genius.com/Simon-and-garfunkel-the-sound-of-silence-lyrics
for any concept to exist, the opposite must also exist
a) CON (together; with) CAPERE (to take)...how could one take if all is together?
b) What if all sets apart so that each one within can take from one another?
c) What if taking (want) puts one into opposition with another one holding onto (not want), while ignoring all given (need)?
We connect
a) How did the connection between one and we came to be? How could a singular being (one) be plural (we)?
b) Connect aka CON (together; with) NECTERE (to bind)...what binds ones free will of choice together with another?
Who suggests RELIGION (Latin religio) - "to bind anew"...many to few or few to many?
GOD...universe of duality
UNI (one) of DUAL (two)... "You shall have no other gods before me."...duality contradicts monotheism.
if you are anything other
Being implies ONE among other...it implies ignorance of ONEself to view self as part of other.
a jewish utopia feeding on...Goyim
a) If feeding is an utopia/ideal/imagination, then what generates hunger?
b) Why are there always more goyim than jew...more students than teachers; more followers than leaders; more poor than rich; more slaves than masters; more prey than predators; more many than few?
Does nature generate more than each ONE?
feudalism
FEU'DAL, adjective - "embracing tenures by services" + TEN'URE, noun (Latin teneo) - "to hold".
Feudalism implies suggestion (service) by few tempting consent (embracing) by many, and each one of many utilizes free will of choice to hold onto the suggested -ism.
genderfluid
Generation (motion) implies fluid (momentum) for regenerating solid (matter)...form (life) can be tricked to ignore flow (inception towards death) by holding onto other form, hence ignoring to regenerate itself.
The entire thing is fully normalized manufactured consent
a) Normal (want) implies versus abnormal (not want)...a conflict of reason shaped by ones consent to the suggestion of another, while ignoring perceivable need.
b) What's the opposite of normal/standard? Alternative aka ones adaptation to all perceivable, which one ignores when holding onto a suggested standard.
c) Nature doesn't manufacture consent...it forces adaptation by setting apart manual (life) within auto (inception towards death).
Homo-shlomo (homogeneity of peace/piece) offers the service of manufactured consent by tempting gentiles to willingly give manual consent to the suggested service...for a reasonable price.
a) Notice FOLLOW... next to the one weirdo, which implies how many others responding to presented?
b) Influence implies being within fluid, and form (life) put into fluid (inception towards death) gains momentum...
c) People implies an accumulation of person (per sonos; by sound)...sound moves; so anything within its momentum can be accumulated.
All Votes Go To The jews
Besides chosen ones, there's only ones choice...which one ignores when voting.
free...on thin ice
Free (choice) implies within dominance (balance)...the foundation of natural law isn't gonna break under one; one is the break (temporary growing partial) within foundation (ongoing loss of whole).
Slipping on ice implies imbalance, hence ones choice ignoring balance.
a) Change implies origin; hope implies those within change mentally affixing an outcome.
b) Being (life) within change (inception towards death) implies transformation...ignoring this implies "translation". Form needs to react to changing origin; ignoring this for affixed outcome implies a late reaction.
c) Suggested information (words) implies a translation of perceivable inspiration (sound)....words subtitle sound; while dubbing those within.
- Terror/terreo - "to frighten"
- Patriot/patria/pater - "one's native country; father"
Few suggest terror-ism and patriot-ism for analysis and synthesis among many. That's how alchemy works.
Level Earth is a great rhetoric...going against it implies taking the side of imbalance. When speaking about water seeking level on earth; ask...how does earth seek level in space?
a) Argue implies ones charge against another, hence tempting 1 and 1 together into 2...this is called reasoning.
b) Again (a second time)...if inception towards death implies ones first time, then what's the second?
a) Collaborate aka working (labor) together (co)
b) ARBEIT MACHT FREI (work sets free).
c) Being free will of choice implies being center of EN'ERGY, noun (Gr. work) - "internal or inherent power", hence work (energy) setting one free (choice).
"The force will be with you, always"
enlightenment
Memory (ment) can only exist within (en) light...spectrum.
false religion
Religion/religio - "to bind anew" implies ones choice to bind self to a suggested side like true or false.
all sects of one religion
Religion implies one binding self to another one, hence one + one = two (dualism). Binding self to another willingly implies sect/sekw - "to follow".
creed
That implies ones consent/belief/faith/creed/credit given to the suggested -ism of another. Sect (to follow) comes after creed (to consent).
humanism means that man can make his own
-ism implies as suggested by one human to another human. The one consenting makes himself subordinate to the one suggesting, who in return gained permission to remake one by shaping the meaning of the suggested -ism.
Human aka hue (color) of man implies spectrum (momentum) within light (motion) for rays (matter) within...each separated from one another internally. The contract between suggestion (humanism) and consent (humanist) contradicts internal separation with external division.
a) If all is one; then any division made within implies two...one against another one.
b) One (perception) cannot divide oneness (perceivable) without suggesting DUAL-ism to another...it's ones consent to that which establishes a conflict of reason (one vs one) aka a division into two.
c) DIVIDE, verb - "to part or separate an entire thing; to part a thing into two or more pieces"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Divide
d) Numerical aka NUM'BER, noun - "designation of a unit", hence Latin unus - "one".
A jew (chosen one) suggests gentiles to count other ones, while ignoring oneself, which establishes conflicts of reason aka division into two.
e) The trick...suggesting division (one vs one aka two) to distract from perceivable separation (oneness into ones aka whole into partials).
Example: Take an apple as one. The first division establishes two parts of one apple. That's a suggested division tempting one to ignore perceivable separation aka seed within kernel; within flesh; within skin; within soil of all...each one part within whole oneness.
Separation offers partials the opportunity to discern self within whole...division tempts partials to fight each other, while ignoring whole.
f) All implies one in energy (internal/inherent power)...TWO energy cannot exist.
to defeat a diaspora all different ones need to come together
DIA (two) SPORA (to scatter; disperse)...gentiles are the dia aka the accumulated collective, which permits each chosen one to scatter and disperse among them.
It's a jew who suggests gentiles to come together aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka multiculturalism; mongrelization; miscegenation; melting pot; mass migration aka united states; united nations; european union, united kingdom; soviet union aka university; uniformity; unisex; unicode; unicef; universal pictures; universal serial bus (USB); universal studios; universal basic income aka equality through diversity and so on.
Nature sets apart aka from whole (perceivable) into each partial (perception)...few within suggest many to come together as to remain apart... https://www.amazon.com/People-Apart-Europe-1789-1939-History/dp/0198219806
Apartheid within wholeness implies the status quo of being.
a) Asset aka ad satis - "to sufficiency; until enough"...as if those seeking control of assets could ever gain enough.
b) Wealth - "external happiness"...does any so called rothschild look happy?
to be killed
That implies ones free will of choice and has nothing to do with others.
heirs
As long as many consent to suggestions by few, so long will few remain heirs of everything many are ignoring within perceivable, while consenting to suggested.
In reality...ones perception implies heir of all perceivable. That's what inheritance (to receive from nature) implies.
be more informed...less in debt
What if taking on more information burdens one with more debt from those suggesting it?
have more savings
Current implies motion...who suggests that currency can be saved aka preserved by injury from motion?
always gets in the way
How is being (life) within way (inception towards death) an issue?
relationship
Ships relating/connecting with each other is how pirates hijack. Shouldn't a vessel (life) within sea (inception towards death) navigate freely (free will of choice) from one another?
What have you accomplished?
ACCOM'PLISH, verb - "to finish entirely by bringing together"...that's tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka the equalization (inception towards death) of differences (life).
One needs to resist the want to accomplish. The more one resists equalization; the more differences arise.
Neo1
One (partial) can only exist within oneness (whole)...there cannot be anything new/neo within one, for one implies one and only.
Emoto further recommended
a) Ones consent to any suggested recommendation accommodates those suggesting it...never oneself.
b) Emoto/emotion/emoveo - "to move from" implies moving from ones position (life) within motion (inception towards death). Emotion implies temptation.
good effect...
...can only exist within a conflict of reason (good vs bad), which like every conflict afflicts effects aka that which is produced (life) by a cause (inception towards death).
alcohol
Aka AL (all perceivable) KAHALA (to stain; paint)...hence ones consent to suggested alcoholism staining ones perception, while permitting another to paint the stains.
Same allegory as ignoring light (discernment) for darkness (ignorance) permitting another to rule the realm of shadows.
every one of our sixty trillion cells
ONEs consent to suggested pluralism (sixty million) keeps singular (one) mind within a cell....choosing to let go of that consent sustain ones free will of choice outside such a cell.
"the Constitution" means
Standing (stitu; sta) together (con) within action (tion). One cannot stand together within action unless one ignores being moved, and thereby set apart by it...holding onto meaning implies ones ignorance of being moved.
What is the meaning of motion for matter within?
Problem is
Aka "thing put forward", which implies solution (inception towards death) putting forward problems (life).
Sidenote: "Problem in reference to a persistent and seemingly insoluble difficulty is attested from at least 1882, in jewish problem."... https://www.etymonline.com/word/problem#etymonline_v_2594
How hilarious is that???
- CRIME, noun - "to separate, to decree"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/crime
Natural law (inception towards death) separates crime (life)...a criminal few suggests an ignorant many to abide law...being (crime) needs to resist origin (law).
Sleight of hand: "Dead or Alive...you're coming with me"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4pIPXX2bYs
You can see the curvature
- CURVATURE, noun - "a bending in a regular form"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/curvature
- BEND, verb - "to inflect; to direct to a certain point"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/bend
- INFLECT', verb - "to turn from a direct line"
How could form (life) within flow (inception towards death) turn from a direct line? How could ones life sentence, while being directed towards point of death be bend? How could form see flow, while being within? How could sentence see end of sentence (point) while being sentenced?
There can be only one action/agent enacting upon each ones reaction. The matrix/mother/momentum implies the spectrum within action; setting apart reactions. To react implies by ones free will of choice; hence being a smith aka a skilled worker.
Bonus: A mason of free will utilizes black-smiths aka worker skilled in artifice (black) who tempt others to ignore natural (white).
...are giving consent to others shaping what they're believing.
Ones hand implies want to hold onto and need to let go of...others utilize a handshake to agitate a contract, hence tempting one to consent to holding into possession what another one suggested.
Notice the picture used to advertise a handshake... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Handshake aka black and white aka bringing darkness and light together.
Notice the second picture...Nixon shaking hand with Paul VI aka nixon/nexing/nectere - "to bind" + six/sex/seco - "to divide".
Notice further down...tennis players (life) shaking hands over the white line (inception towards death), hence crossing the stream.