My first ever public speech and it was on the JP - Lucas Gage
(files.catbox.moe)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (11)
sorted by:
a) If all is one; then any division made within implies two...one against another one.
b) One (perception) cannot divide oneness (perceivable) without suggesting DUAL-ism to another...it's ones consent to that which establishes a conflict of reason (one vs one) aka a division into two.
c) DIVIDE, verb - "to part or separate an entire thing; to part a thing into two or more pieces"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Divide
d) Numerical aka NUM'BER, noun - "designation of a unit", hence Latin unus - "one".
A jew (chosen one) suggests gentiles to count other ones, while ignoring oneself, which establishes conflicts of reason aka division into two.
e) The trick...suggesting division (one vs one aka two) to distract from perceivable separation (oneness into ones aka whole into partials).
Example: Take an apple as one. The first division establishes two parts of one apple. That's a suggested division tempting one to ignore perceivable separation aka seed within kernel; within flesh; within skin; within soil of all...each one part within whole oneness.
Separation offers partials the opportunity to discern self within whole...division tempts partials to fight each other, while ignoring whole.
f) All implies one in energy (internal/inherent power)...TWO energy cannot exist.
OK, I am not arguing with you again :-)
a) Argue implies ones charge against another, hence tempting 1 and 1 together into 2...this is called reasoning.
b) Again (a second time)...if inception towards death implies ones first time, then what's the second?