- From God to Christ...a reduction?
- From one within all to "me; myself or I"...a reduction?
- From different one within same all to "like another"...a reduction?
- From being done within everything to "doing nothing"...a reduction?
a) PICK'LE, noun - "a state of condition of difficulty or disorder"
b) Ball aka BA'AL - "lord of covenant" aka COVENANT, noun - "to come together; agreement of minds; mutual consent"
Natural order sets each mind within apart from one another...few tempt many together by mutual consent to a suggestion, which establishes a division within order aka a conflict of reason (win vs lose).
Sleight of hand:
- Take me out to the ball game
- Take me out with the crowd
History is cyclical but it ultimately is linear
Nature implies linear (inception towards death)...his artificial story tempts many to reason against each other, hence ignoring linear perception for circular logic about suggestion.
prophecies of Revelation will come to pass
Coming to be (life) within passing (inception towards death) implies a revelation aka RE (reaction) VEIL (exposed to sight) ATION (action).
Action (inception towards death) exposes reactions (life) to sight (perception)...few utilize suggestion aka prophets (one who speaks for god) to distract many from perception.
They will enslave
Nah...only ones free WILL of choice can enslave itself by consent to the suggested will of another.
Slave (ones consent) selects master (another ones suggestion), while ignoring that nature (all perceivable) sets free (each ones perception).
enslave humanity
Hue of man implies the visible spectrum of all light setting apart each one ray within. If a ray consents to another rays suggestion, then a shadow is cast (ignorance) within light (discernment).
in the end
Being implies in-between (life) beginning (inception) and end (death)...being cannot exist IN the beginning or IN the end, only IN-between, hence separated within whole and differentiated from one another.
their rule will be short lived
a) Many willingly consent to follow the rules willed by few...towards death. It's not the rules of few that are short lived; but the many consenting to follow along who are willingly self sacrificing themselves for few.
b) Rule/regere/reg - "to move in a straight line"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/rule#etymonline_v_16625
There can be (life) only one rule (inception towards death)..."rules" imply suggested pluralism by few tempting each ONE of many to ignore to sustain ONEself within the only ONE rule.
Christ will put an end to it all.
Christ/christen - "to anoint" implies coming to be into life. God implies all putting each one Christ (life) from beginning (inception) towards end (death).
Will implies want...God implies need. Each anointed one within all needs to resist wanted temptation by free will of choice.
- Torah/horah - "he taught"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Torah#etymonline_v_15385
- Talmud/lamadh - "he learned"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Talmud#etymonline_v_4343
To learn implies to teach "self" and vice versa. Viewing the torah and talmud as law suggested by another tempts one to ignore that.
moses
Aka mosaic/muse - "to muzzle self; to be absorbed in thought"; which happens if one ignores perceivable for suggested.
hebrew
He-brew his-story to make/magic jew/you fall for it...
juda
Judah/yehudah - "to praise; value" aka ones consent evaluating the suggested values by another.
Being implies anointed one (christ)...ignoring this by consenting to a chosen ones suggestion makes one a traitor (judas) to self.
Traitor/tradere - "transfer over" aka ones consent to the suggestion of another, which also implies religion/religio - "to bind anew"
torah vs judaism
-ism implies a suggestion by another tempting ones consent. Consenting to any suggested -ism establishes a conflict of reason aka versus/verses/wer - "to turn"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/verse#etymonline_v_4738
That's how few turn many against each other within conflicts of reason.
articles
a) Aka added artifice. Judaism implies "old" testament; Christianity implies "new" testament...which one was added?
b) Talmud has mishnah (origin) and gemara (addition) to establish an ongoing conflict about addition (suggested information) while protecting origin (perceivable inspiration).
c) Gentiles ignore origin for addition, hence...
not a single one
a) There can be only one.
b) "not" implies suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing) tempting ones de-nial of everything perceivable, when consenting to suggested.
c) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logic_in_Islamic_philosophy ...compare this to logos/logic/reason as the foundation of Christianity and notice how a so called jew isn't bound to the confines of either.
ESCAPE; verb - "free oneself from confinement"
a) Only within dominance (balance) can one be free (choice).
b) All perceivable sets each ones perception free from one another, while ones consent to suggestions of one another confines ones mind to the suggested.
c) Opposite of escape implies immerse aka "to plunge into a fluid"...being implies temporary solid (life) within ongoing fluid (inception towards death).
Being implies temporary escape (living) during ongoing immersion (dying)....few suggest escapism to tempt many to ignore self discernment within origin for wanting to be somewhere else.
save us all
a) US implies an aggregation of ones within all...few suggest US (united states) to aggregate each consenting one into a many aka collectivism.
b) Save/salvare/sol - "whole"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/save#etymonline_v_22794
Being implies partial within whole...few suggest escapism (save) to tempt each partial back into whole.
Salvation (inception towards death) offers a risk (life)...a risky business proposition. Merchants within sell "secure offers" to tempt ones consent to buy into it.
To truly oppose the schizophrenic empire
Schizo/schism (division) phreno (reason) aka a conflict of reason (true vs false). Reasoning implies one against another one...that's schizophrenic.
Empire/imperare aka in (being within) pere (production) implies being (life) within production (inception towards death).
Many are schizophrenic aka divided against each other within conflicts of reason by consenting to the suggestions of few. Being apart from one another implies "empirical"; being tricked together makes one "moot".
Empire (inception towards death) generates kings (life)...
a) There's only one plan/plane (inception towards death)...no matter how (NGS; Kabbalah etc.) those living within describe it to each other.
b) NEON (neo; new) GENESIS (generate; produce) EVANGEL (gospel aka good spell) ION (action).
Action generates reactions internally...few suggest creationism (new) as gospel to tempt many to ignore being partial within whole.
c) Kabbalah/qabbalah - "reception" aka recipere - "to hold; contain". To receive (suggested) tempts one to ignore given (perceivable)...which cannot be held onto.
The consent of many implies the reception (kabbalah) of few. Ones consenting choice establishes a chosen ones stranglehold.
Restore God
Applying self discernment to this implies RE (ones response) STORE (to hold onto) GOD (all). All moves each one and cannot be held onto.
Few trick many to ignore god (perceivable), thereby establishing wholesale (ones ignorance of perceivable) for retail (ones consent to suggested). Meanwhile many are storing suggested information within memory, which few regulate as currency, while natural current expires whatever is stored.
Fuck tikkun olam
Fuck/fuge - "joint"...that's why fuck is being added to everything to "heal the world by bringing together".
there is only one way to Heaven...I have no idea what you are talking about.
- Cathode aka KATA HODOS (down the way)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/cathode#etymonline_v_5497
- Anode aka ANA HODOS (up the way)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/anode#etymonline_v_13486
There's only one way (inception towards death) for each wanderer (life)...YET...each wanderer chooses to go up (rise) or down (fall) the way.
Catholic/cathode tempts the wanderer to go down the way...that's what I'm talking about.
A pie cut into pieces is still part of one pie
A pie (motion) cut (momentum) into pieces (matter) implies a procession transforming a being. Such a being (life) has to struggle during procession (inception towards death) to remain a piece within a pie.
Few tempt many together to destroy each piece/peace...
jews promote multiculturalism because they want to blur the differences.
How does a "universal" church not also blur the differences by bringing the flock together (Gospel of John)?
the Church accepts differences
a) If difference accepts difference, then they equalize each other.
b) To accept or deny a suggestion establishes a conflict of reason (accept vs deny) among differences behaving alike.
c) Nature doesn't require acceptance (want) or denial (not want)...it forces adaptation (need) from each one within.
come together to worship the one
a) Before that can be suggested...the ONE sets each ONE apart from ONE another.
b) Together implies "towards getting"; being apart implies growth (life) within loss (inception towards death). Being isn't about getting, but about adapting to what one already got.
c) How does nature communicate to one TO GET the apple of the tree? If the apple implies a wanted temptation, then what about needed resistance to hunger?
What if one needs to resist (hunger), while struggling with wanted temptation (apple)? That's what being apart within whole implies...
jewish globomulticulturalism...wants...to create a slave
a) If a gentile consents to a suggested -ism by a jew, then the gentile selects a jew as master, while submitting self as slave.
b) Consenting implies wanting OR not wanting suggested, while ignoring perceivable need.
What if a jew doesn't want; but simply tempts gentiles to want or not want jewish suggestions, which establishes a conflict of reason (want vs not want) among gentiles...controlled by a jew from outside?
why are CD's circular?
Empty center; noisy circumference; squaring the circle ( https://img.gvid.tv/i/2iCTP8nZ.jpg) while cutting corners.
a) Being implies center (perception) filled by silent circumference (perceivable), hence sound flowing silently through formed instruments.
b) Ignoring perceivable for suggested implies... https://genius.com/Simon-and-garfunkel-the-sound-of-silence-lyrics
- People talking without speaking
- People hearing without listening
- People writing songs that voices never shared
- No one dared
- Disturb the sound of silence
c) Being implies in-between left/right + front/back + up/down aka within a cube, while wielding an angular perspective within perceivable. Reasoning about suggested aka circular logic "cuts the corners", hence permitting others to utilize compass and square to manipulate circles and angles.
d) COM (together; with) PACT/PAG (to fasten) DISC/DIKEIN (to throw)...nature throws (inception towards death) apart (life); few within tempt many together with a pact (consent to suggested) to fasten the partials back to whole.
I think in fundamentals instead of optional...in this case the contradiction between religion (Latin religio; to bind anew) and race (Latin raddix; radius; ray). The former implies "together", while the latter implies "apart".
a) Why is there a universal church for a separated race of people?
b) Does nature make universal by putting together or set units apart from one another within whole?
c) Notice that a jew promotes tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka united states; united nations; european union; united kingdom; soviet union aka mass migration; miscegenation, melting pot; multiculturalism etc.
How is all of this not fundamental to the contradiction between "together" and "apart"?
d) What about cathode aka cata hodos (down the way) and anode aka ana hodos (up the way)? If catholic distracts from cathode by tempting believers to follow along, then where's the anode?
a man is not defiled by what enters his mouth, but by what comes out of it
What enters (perceivable sound)...what comes out (suggested words).
Anyone who curses his father or mother must be put to death
Aka anyone (matter) who curses (suggested words over perceivable sound) his father (motion) or mother (momentum) must be put to death.
If matter (life) ignores the momentum (inception towards death) of motion, then being puts itself to death.
the Pharisees were offended
Pharisee/perish/parash - "separate"...nature (motion) offers (momentum) separation (matter).
blind guides
Aka ones blind consent to guiding suggestions by another.
Jesus did not answer a word
Hence adapting to perceivable sound, while resisting to give consent to suggested words.
His disciples came and urged Him
Aka consenting followers tempting a leader to suggest progressivism aka slaves selecting a master.
Live with inspiration rather than suggestions.
Living WITHIN inspiration rather than holding suggested information WITHIN self.
Nature really can teach
Nature moves matter...matter adapting to motion implies learning to teach and teaching to learn. Matter consenting (student) to each other (teacher) corrupts that.
Schaubergers issues started when he tried to teach others what he learned to teach himself within nature.
many people live their lives distant from nature and burdened by suggestions
Hence facing inwards, while reflecting upon the suggested burden held within. The issue with describing this is that WORDS are that suggested burden ones inscribes into self. Doing so makes perceivable sound seem distant...background noise.
I feel like you would like
Motion equalizes (inception towards death) differences (life)...few tempt many to respond "alike".
Depeche Mode
Aka Dispatched (inception towards death) Extension (life).
they may be on the dark side
a) Choice can only exist in-between sides aka within balance...holding onto a side imbalances choice.
b) Light implies motion; dark implies matter casting shadows upon each other. In-between that operates momentum as the spectrum of visible light for each differentiated ray within.
Stripped...about peeling back the layers of people's suggested personality
The cover one tries to peel off is held within. A masons utilizes ones free will of choice to build a wall of ignorance within self by tempting one to consent to brick after brick of suggested information, hence cementing beliefs/opinions/definitions etc.
Those who try to peel back layers aka loosening bricks aka crumple the joints of masonry are facing both many fortifying that wall of ignorance from within and few holding their hands against the wailing wall, while filling the cracks/joints with wishes...these few also fertilize that wall by fucking it, hence German FUGE/fuck - "joint".
Here's the sleight of hand: The last name was originally spelled "Fucker"... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fugger_family
That being said...both inception to life and life to death imply a "naked" transformation. The natural order implies that which STRIPS, while those struggling with the need to shelter within are being TEASED.
Sleight of hand: "It's always tease; tease; tease..." https://genius.com/The-clash-should-i-stay-or-should-i-go-lyrics
free of suggestions
Free to resist (need) suggestion (want). There's no "free of" only free (choice) within dominance (balance)...and dominance (inception towards death) makes free (life) fall aka "falling domino" rhetoric.
stifle the soul
Soul/sole aka "one and only"...all moves; each one within struggles with stifling (difficulty breathing), hence suffering through release.
So many of their songs are pertinent I think to what you talk about here
Soul/sole aka all is one in energy...each different song was composed within same sound.
The issue with discerning this is that others suggest pertinent/pertain aka per (forwards) tenere (to hold), hence tempting one to hold onto the temporary formed song, while ignoring the flow of ongoing sound.
no it doesn’t.
There's the brick within self...de-nial (Latin nihilo; nothing)
Shut up!
A brick wall set within self as a line of defense against others coming in.
their bad behavior is intrinsically caused by their bad racial genetics, they must be removed....established the Catholic (meaning universal) Church
Universal/universus - "all together"...how does the religious (all together) not contradict the racial (apart from one another)? The genetic issues are based on mixing; right?
If someone chooses...what would happen to him after his death?
Suggested happenstance (to come by chance) tempts life to ignore choice and its origin within balance...only within balance can there be choice...not before or after.
Few suggest "before" to forward being aka progressivism, and "after" aka alternativism to distract being from "now" aka perceivable moment-um (balance) of motion for matter (choice) within.
In short...nature implies moving origin; happen tempts those within a moving origin to choose to wait for the chance of an outcome.
There is right and there is wrong.
Only within a conflict of reason aka within a consenting ones "imagination".
there would be no freewill if he intervened
a) Add "of choice" to freewill and ask yourself if the origin of choice (balance) can intervene in the choices made within?
b) Few suggest "freewill" in return for consent by many. Consenting to a chosen ones suggestion tempts one to ignore ones choice.
Meanwhile in reality...IF free will of choice; THEN free within dominance; will/want within need; out of aka within, and choice within balance...only free will of choice can discern itself within origin.
Freewill as suggested aka "the capacity or ability to choose between different possible courses of action" tempts one to ignore different reactions (choice) within course (balance) of same action (motion).
The image people have about God is probably not the right one.
a) Right/rego - "straight line" implies being (life) moved from inception towards death...that's ones right.
b) Right vs wrong implies a conflict of reason shaped by ones consent to suggested moralism by another. Reasoning against another corrupts ones discernment of self within a straight line aka ones right/rite of passage.
c) An image implies "artificial representation of natural origin". If one holds onto suggested information (artifice), while ignoring perceivable inspiration (natural), then an image aka imitation aka copy was made within ones mind/memory.
Sleight of hand: "It wasn't a lie...it was real in my imagination" ~Herman Rosenblat
best of all
Best of all tempts one to ignore BE (being) ST (standing firm) within ALL.
Sleight of hand: https://genius.com/Joe-esposito-youre-the-best-lyrics
God is impartial
God was whole before partials come to be within.
our souls
Soul/sole - "one and only"...there can be only one; one for all and all for one.
Few suggest pluralism (souls) and determinism (our) to tempt ONE to consent to another ONE, hence ignoring one and only for dual-ism.
Perhaps the same soul that would kill and do all that evil is the same soul being reincarnated into the victim.
a) RE (responding to) IN (being within) CARNA (flesh aka matter) TION (action aka motion).
b) Same motion (inception towards death) for each different reincarnated matter (life).
know for certain
Being free will of choice within moving knowledge (perceivable inspiration) implies having the FREE will of choice to become uncertain by suggesting certainty, hence establishing a conflict of reason (affirm vs deny).
Knowledge (perceivable inspiration) doesn't require either affirmation, nor denial...understanding (suggested information) does.
Someone who commits wrong
One commits by consenting to suggested moralism, which then establishes a conflict of reason (right vs wrong)...within which one endlessly re-commits to a different side (or opinion) within the same conflict.
one way or another
There can be only one way (inception towards death) for each one (life) within.
Sleight of hand: https://genius.com/Blondie-one-way-or-another-lyrics
what kinda god lets innocents get raped and murdered
a) Kinda/kind/kin - "class, sort, variety" implies partials within whole. Kinda (partial) God (whole) contradicts itself.
b) Let implies whole letting partials wield FREE will of choice to respond without interfering. Choice can only operate at center of balance (need/want). One needs to resist wanted temptations...
c) Innocence aka in (being within) nocere (harms way) implies being (life) within harms way (inception towards death).
Guilt/gieldan - "to pay for, debt" implies harming self by taking from another, while ignoring to be in nocere.
if your baby got...
a) Implication (if/then) implies a moving origin...got/get (taking possession of) implies ones ignorance of being (life) within a moving (inception towards death) origin.
b) Baby/babylon/babel - "confusion; disorder" + bab (gate) ilu (god) are suggested deceptions to distract one from off-spring, which implies springing of origin into being, hence coming (inception towards death) towards being (life) aka already passing through the gate of god.
still cool with god
Blaming the origin of each ones free will of choice implies blasphemy and shirking response-ability. If choice goes against origin (balance); then choice imbalances itself.
be leerily of Freudian psychology
Logy (reasoning about suggested) tempts one to ignore psyche (animation of perceivable). Logy is utilized by few to distract many from psyche.
Freud/friend vs fiend implies logy/logic/reason...few suggest freudianism to tempt many to consent to a conflict of reason (friend vs fiend).
- YHWH/jehovah/hawah - "was"
Your question about what it IS contradicts WAS. You are being tricked to wait for a suggested answer, while ignoring perceivable solution (inception towards death) for any problem (life) within.
his own religious cult
Religion (Latin religio; to bind anew)...one cannot own religion; one binding self to another implies religion. Few utilize suggestion to cultivate religious "consent" among many.
YHWH...saying this
a) Nature does not pronounce (speak; utter articulately)...ignoring this implies falling for spell-craft aka sooth-saying.
b) YHWH/jehovah/hawah - "was"....suggesting what IS tempts one to ignore what WAS perceivable.
IS implies suggested information; WAS implies perceivable inspiration...the former tempts one to hold onto; while the latter can't be held onto.
Religion is a delusion created by our subconscious mind in its attempt to deal with fear ~schlomo
a) "attempt to deal" implies ones temptation to consent to a suggestion by another.
b) Consenting to the suggestion of another binds one anew aka religion (Latin religio; to bind anew).
c) Suggested creationism tempts one to consent aka to bind self to another aka to make a deal with a merchant of temptation.
d) CON (together; with) tempts one to ignore SCION (to know). Each one perceives all perceivable...that implies knowledge. Ignoring this for the suggestion of another implies under-standing aka SUB-CON-SCIOUS.
e) Fear implies towards an outcome; being implies in response (life) to origin (inception towards death). Few suggest terror-ism (Latin terreo; fear) to tempt many to become afraid of outcomes, while ignoring origin...aka distraction by inversion.
f) Consenting to a suggestion, hence binding self to another (religio) establishes a conflict of reason, within which both sides utilize deceptive opinions aka delusions.
a) Inspiration cannot be held onto....
b) Information requires ones consent to hold onto it, hence "bricking" ones memory with a burden.
c) Brick/break implies something set apart...flow (inception towards death) sets form (life) apart from one another. Few "inform" many by tempting consent and suggestion together within a contract aka religion (Latin religio; to bind anew).
d) "not" implies suggested nihilism (Latin nihilo; nothing)...consenting to it tempts one to de-nial everything perceivable.
In short...nothing implies suggested information; everything implies perceivable inspiration.
e) IN (being within) FORM (formed by) ATION (action) + IN (being within) SPIRIT (breathing within) ATION (action).
f) Holding onto information makes adapting to inspiration harder...
a) Mason/mag - "to knead; fashion; fit"...a writer kneads, a reader is FREE to read.
b) Suggested information implies brick; ones consent implies mortar...a mason of free will utilizes these to build walls of ignorance within others.
c) Words are shaped by LETTERS, yet only if one LETS another shape words onto which meaning is added.
d) Ones consent AUTHORIZES the suggested information by another aka ones choice selects chosen ones offer.
Build/bheue - "to be, grow"...motion levels; matter builds.
solid stone
A solid (life) can only exist within fluid (inception towards death). Can a "stone" be liquefied and grown into shape? Can heat melt small stones into larger ones?