Reality of "God" . Responce post
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (32)
sorted by:
be leerily of Freudian psychology. He was a fucking mess inside his own head and his work was all influenced by his own personal issues related to his mother.
yeah he wasnt great but this resonates with me . what kinda god lets innocents get raped and murdered . would love a responce. If your baby got raped and shot in the head you are still cool with god?
a) Kinda/kind/kin - "class, sort, variety" implies partials within whole. Kinda (partial) God (whole) contradicts itself.
b) Let implies whole letting partials wield FREE will of choice to respond without interfering. Choice can only operate at center of balance (need/want). One needs to resist wanted temptations...
c) Innocence aka in (being within) nocere (harms way) implies being (life) within harms way (inception towards death).
Guilt/gieldan - "to pay for, debt" implies harming self by taking from another, while ignoring to be in nocere.
a) Implication (if/then) implies a moving origin...got/get (taking possession of) implies ones ignorance of being (life) within a moving (inception towards death) origin.
b) Baby/babylon/babel - "confusion; disorder" + bab (gate) ilu (god) are suggested deceptions to distract one from off-spring, which implies springing of origin into being, hence coming (inception towards death) towards being (life) aka already passing through the gate of god.
Blaming the origin of each ones free will of choice implies blasphemy and shirking response-ability. If choice goes against origin (balance); then choice imbalances itself.