So, I do read classics from time to time and recently have started to notice how awfully lot of them were freemasons.
-
Bram Stoker, author of Dracula - Buckingham and Chandos Lodge No. 1150.
-
Mark Twain, author of Tom Sawyer, Huckleberry Finn and many more - Grand Lodge of Ohio.
-
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, author of those cozy Sherlock Holmes mysteries - Phoenix Lodge No. 257 in Southsea.
-
Rudyard Kipling, author of The Jungle Book - Hope and Perseverance Lodge, No. 782, in Lahore.
-
Sir Walter Scott, author of numerous historical novels, including Ivanhoe, Rob Roy and many more - Lodge St David, No. 36 in Edinburgh.
You get the idea. A lot of classic authors were freemasons. Now, even if we discount all the theories about masonry etc, it's still a lot. No, really! Why almost all of our historical, adventure and other classics were written by freemasons? Would those books even be considered classics, if not for the mason membership of those authors? Hell, maybe those books were written with a specific purpose and were made into "famous" classics deliberately, precisely because of freemasonry of their respective authors?
Back then book reading was kind of like Hollywood and Netflix of today and we all know how much propaganda and ridiculous lies are in movies these days... So, seems to me a lot of our history and general worldview might have been created deliberately... and we might be living in an essentially manufactured world, where everything we think we know, might actually be not what it seems to be...
So, what are your thoughts? Does anyone know any more famous freemasons?
Empty center; noisy circumference; squaring the circle ( https://img.gvid.tv/i/2iCTP8nZ.jpg) while cutting corners.
a) Being implies center (perception) filled by silent circumference (perceivable), hence sound flowing silently through formed instruments.
b) Ignoring perceivable for suggested implies... https://genius.com/Simon-and-garfunkel-the-sound-of-silence-lyrics
c) Being implies in-between left/right + front/back + up/down aka within a cube, while wielding an angular perspective within perceivable. Reasoning about suggested aka circular logic "cuts the corners", hence permitting others to utilize compass and square to manipulate circles and angles.
d) COM (together; with) PACT/PAG (to fasten) DISC/DIKEIN (to throw)...nature throws (inception towards death) apart (life); few within tempt many together with a pact (consent to suggested) to fasten the partials back to whole.
So the jew plan of universalism is just like neon Genesis evangeleon... And like the kabbalah. Restore God by piecing back together all of the fragments to make one vessel. Satanic and I hate it. Fuck tikkun olam
a) There's only one plan/plane (inception towards death)...no matter how (NGS; Kabbalah etc.) those living within describe it to each other.
b) NEON (neo; new) GENESIS (generate; produce) EVANGEL (gospel aka good spell) ION (action).
Action generates reactions internally...few suggest creationism (new) as gospel to tempt many to ignore being partial within whole.
c) Kabbalah/qabbalah - "reception" aka recipere - "to hold; contain". To receive (suggested) tempts one to ignore given (perceivable)...which cannot be held onto.
The consent of many implies the reception (kabbalah) of few. Ones consenting choice establishes a chosen ones stranglehold.
Applying self discernment to this implies RE (ones response) STORE (to hold onto) GOD (all). All moves each one and cannot be held onto.
Few trick many to ignore god (perceivable), thereby establishing wholesale (ones ignorance of perceivable) for retail (ones consent to suggested). Meanwhile many are storing suggested information within memory, which few regulate as currency, while natural current expires whatever is stored.
Fuck/fuge - "joint"...that's why fuck is being added to everything to "heal the world by bringing together".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PNVEQgXsBgs