let me ask you your take on this, If someone chooses to torture and murder a child, perhaps many, many children for the sole purpose of his enjoyment. What would happen to him after his death?
You may try to justify it by saying he had no choice in the matter because of their life circumstances or what not. But you know damn well there are moments when we consciously choose our decisions. Do you believe someone can knowingly commit evil and get away with it?
The same way energy and matter in the universe are simply transformed. Someone committing evil will not be able to get away with it. Regardless of any religious inclinations or rituals. There is right and there is wrong.
If someone chooses...what would happen to him after his death?
Suggested happenstance (to come by chance) tempts life to ignore choice and its origin within balance...only within balance can there be choice...not before or after.
Few suggest "before" to forward being aka progressivism, and "after" aka alternativism to distract being from "now" aka perceivable moment-um (balance) of motion for matter (choice) within.
In short...nature implies moving origin; happen tempts those within a moving origin to choose to wait for the chance of an outcome.
There is right and there is wrong.
Only within a conflict of reason aka within a consenting ones "imagination".
let me ask you your take on this, If someone chooses to torture and murder a child, perhaps many, many children for the sole purpose of his enjoyment. What would happen to him after his death?
You may try to justify it by saying he had no choice in the matter because of their life circumstances or what not. But you know damn well there are moments when we consciously choose our decisions. Do you believe someone can knowingly commit evil and get away with it?
The same way energy and matter in the universe are simply transformed. Someone committing evil will not be able to get away with it. Regardless of any religious inclinations or rituals. There is right and there is wrong.
Suggested happenstance (to come by chance) tempts life to ignore choice and its origin within balance...only within balance can there be choice...not before or after.
Few suggest "before" to forward being aka progressivism, and "after" aka alternativism to distract being from "now" aka perceivable moment-um (balance) of motion for matter (choice) within.
In short...nature implies moving origin; happen tempts those within a moving origin to choose to wait for the chance of an outcome.
Only within a conflict of reason aka within a consenting ones "imagination".