I think in fundamentals instead of optional...in this case the contradiction between religion (Latin religio; to bind anew) and race (Latin raddix; radius; ray). The former implies "together", while the latter implies "apart".
a) Why is there a universal church for a separated race of people?
b) Does nature make universal by putting together or set units apart from one another within whole?
c) Notice that a jew promotes tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka united states; united nations; european union; united kingdom; soviet union aka mass migration; miscegenation, melting pot; multiculturalism etc.
How is all of this not fundamental to the contradiction between "together" and "apart"?
d) What about cathode aka cata hodos (down the way) and anode aka ana hodos (up the way)? If catholic distracts from cathode by tempting believers to follow along, then where's the anode?
a) Because there is only one way to Heaven, through the One Christ and His One Church.
b) A pie cut into pieces is still part of one pie.
c) Yes, Jews promote multiculturalism because they want to blur the differences.
The distinction between universalism in the Church and globomulticulturalism is this: Universalism within the Church accepts differences, celebrates them, and wants distinct nations, peoples and rites to come together to worship the One, True God. Whereas JEwish globomulticulturalism doesn't respect differences, hate them, and wants to eliminate all distinct nation, peoples and cultures, in order to create a slave class ruled by the Jews. One is a non-gay rainbow, and the second is a world of beige sameness. See the difference?
There's only one way (inception towards death) for each wanderer (life)...YET...each wanderer chooses to go up (rise) or down (fall) the way.
Catholic/cathode tempts the wanderer to go down the way...that's what I'm talking about.
A pie cut into pieces is still part of one pie
A pie (motion) cut (momentum) into pieces (matter) implies a procession transforming a being. Such a being (life) has to struggle during procession (inception towards death) to remain a piece within a pie.
Few tempt many together to destroy each piece/peace...
jews promote multiculturalism because they want to blur the differences.
How does a "universal" church not also blur the differences by bringing the flock together (Gospel of John)?
the Church accepts differences
a) If difference accepts difference, then they equalize each other.
b) To accept or deny a suggestion establishes a conflict of reason (accept vs deny) among differences behaving alike.
c) Nature doesn't require acceptance (want) or denial (not want)...it forces adaptation (need) from each one within.
come together to worship the one
a) Before that can be suggested...the ONE sets each ONE apart from ONE another.
b) Together implies "towards getting"; being apart implies growth (life) within loss (inception towards death). Being isn't about getting, but about adapting to what one already got.
c) How does nature communicate to one TO GET the apple of the tree? If the apple implies a wanted temptation, then what about needed resistance to hunger?
What if one needs to resist (hunger), while struggling with wanted temptation (apple)? That's what being apart within whole implies...
jewish globomulticulturalism...wants...to create a slave
a) If a gentile consents to a suggested -ism by a jew, then the gentile selects a jew as master, while submitting self as slave.
b) Consenting implies wanting OR not wanting suggested, while ignoring perceivable need.
What if a jew doesn't want; but simply tempts gentiles to want or not want jewish suggestions, which establishes a conflict of reason (want vs not want) among gentiles...controlled by a jew from outside?
I think in fundamentals instead of optional...in this case the contradiction between religion (Latin religio; to bind anew) and race (Latin raddix; radius; ray). The former implies "together", while the latter implies "apart".
a) Why is there a universal church for a separated race of people?
b) Does nature make universal by putting together or set units apart from one another within whole?
c) Notice that a jew promotes tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka united states; united nations; european union; united kingdom; soviet union aka mass migration; miscegenation, melting pot; multiculturalism etc.
How is all of this not fundamental to the contradiction between "together" and "apart"?
d) What about cathode aka cata hodos (down the way) and anode aka ana hodos (up the way)? If catholic distracts from cathode by tempting believers to follow along, then where's the anode?
a) Because there is only one way to Heaven, through the One Christ and His One Church.
b) A pie cut into pieces is still part of one pie.
c) Yes, Jews promote multiculturalism because they want to blur the differences.
The distinction between universalism in the Church and globomulticulturalism is this: Universalism within the Church accepts differences, celebrates them, and wants distinct nations, peoples and rites to come together to worship the One, True God. Whereas JEwish globomulticulturalism doesn't respect differences, hate them, and wants to eliminate all distinct nation, peoples and cultures, in order to create a slave class ruled by the Jews. One is a non-gay rainbow, and the second is a world of beige sameness. See the difference?
d) I have no idea what you are talking abouit.
There's only one way (inception towards death) for each wanderer (life)...YET...each wanderer chooses to go up (rise) or down (fall) the way.
Catholic/cathode tempts the wanderer to go down the way...that's what I'm talking about.
A pie (motion) cut (momentum) into pieces (matter) implies a procession transforming a being. Such a being (life) has to struggle during procession (inception towards death) to remain a piece within a pie.
Few tempt many together to destroy each piece/peace...
How does a "universal" church not also blur the differences by bringing the flock together (Gospel of John)?
a) If difference accepts difference, then they equalize each other.
b) To accept or deny a suggestion establishes a conflict of reason (accept vs deny) among differences behaving alike.
c) Nature doesn't require acceptance (want) or denial (not want)...it forces adaptation (need) from each one within.
a) Before that can be suggested...the ONE sets each ONE apart from ONE another.
b) Together implies "towards getting"; being apart implies growth (life) within loss (inception towards death). Being isn't about getting, but about adapting to what one already got.
c) How does nature communicate to one TO GET the apple of the tree? If the apple implies a wanted temptation, then what about needed resistance to hunger?
What if one needs to resist (hunger), while struggling with wanted temptation (apple)? That's what being apart within whole implies...
a) If a gentile consents to a suggested -ism by a jew, then the gentile selects a jew as master, while submitting self as slave.
b) Consenting implies wanting OR not wanting suggested, while ignoring perceivable need.
What if a jew doesn't want; but simply tempts gentiles to want or not want jewish suggestions, which establishes a conflict of reason (want vs not want) among gentiles...controlled by a jew from outside?