needs to be replaced
What if being implies placed response (life) within need (inception towards death)? What if waiting for any replacement tempts one to ignore that?
our only hope
a) Our (plural) contradicts only (singular)...what if others suggest pluralism to tempt ONE to ignore self?
b) Hope (and fear) implies towards outcome; being implies in response to origin? What if others suggest outcomes to tempt one to ignore perceivable origin?
meaning
a) What if all meaning is suggested by few to tempt many to respond alike, while reasoning against each other about it?
b) What if meaning/intention/having in mind implies ones consent to hold onto suggested information, while ignoring perceivable inspiration?
what exactly do you mean? At least specify...
This want for exactitude and specification implies tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka trying to affix meaning, while ignoring that nature moves.
That is a definition of a word.
Definite/define - "to affix"...hence "the system is broken and needs to be fixed."
That's the trick...a jew suggests a system (word) to tempt gentiles to try to affix it (definition), while ignoring that nature (sound) sets apart each one within.
which
a) Perception is mandatory; suggestion is optional...asking which, while waiting for a suggested answer, tempts one to ignore mandatory adaptation to perceivable.
b) https://www.etymonline.com/word/which
Perceivable implies same; perception implies different; suggestion implies alike.
Order (inception towards death) generates chaos (life)...chaos (growth) struggles to sustain self within order (loss).
Chaos facing each other within conflicts of reason, about suggested information, ignores the natural order of perceivable inspiration.
Sleight of hand: Face/Off...
has always been since the fall
How many beings (life) fall within the way of all (inception towards death)? Each one!
the system is broken
System implies "a whole compounded of parts"; which cannot work, because a moving whole sets partials apart from one another.
Few tempt many to consent to suggested systems called -ISMS, which nature; the moving whole, forces apart no matter how long the consenting many are holding onto it.
needs to be fixed
Aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together), set into the consenting minds of gentiles by a suggesting jew. This mindset of "needing" to fix a moving system inverts reality...needing to move; wanting to affix.
Nature cannot be fixed...being can be tricked to ignore "to be" aka towards (inception towards death) being (life).
Being implies temporary chaos (life) within ongoing natural order (inception towards death)...few suggest -ISMS to tempt many to create order out of chaos by fixing together that which nature sets apart.
VS
That's the sub-VERS-ion within a gentiles mind called logic/reason, which tempts gentiles to turn against each other within conflicts of reason about jewish suggestions.
Left VS right is based on gentile consent to suggested left-ism and right-ism by a jew...while choosing to ignore perceivable balance (right/left) within nature. It's the VS which imbalances ones consenting choice, when choosing to hold onto a side.
the system is working as intended and needs to be destroyed.
Underneath any suggested system WORKS perceivable natural aka an ongoing process of dying (loss) which generates temporary life (growth).
EN'ERGY, noun (Greek work) - "internal or inherent power"...a being is employed within work as the power of growth within the power of loss aka as reaction within action aka as one within all aka as partial within whole aka as choice within balance aka as resistance within velocity etc.
Work cannot be destroyed...only employment can be terminated.
Which one is it?
Only oneself can consent to what another suggest IS, while ignoring what WAS perceivable beforehand. Nature was moving before anyone within can choose to hold onto what is...doing that turns one away from nature (motion) and against each other (matter).
Davos
a) Davos (Latin tubus; ravine) - "to rob; to plunder"
b) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:CHE_Davos_Flag.svg + https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukraine#/media/File:Flag_of_Ukraine.svg
ideas coming from desire
Aka suggested idealism tempting ones desire to consent.
Ideas coming from emotion
Emotion (moving out) tempts one to ignore being within motion...others suggest idealism to tempt ones consent to hold onto ideas, which ignores motion.
to minimize reality
Reality cannot be minimized or maximized...all is real. Each one within reality can be tempted to minimize or maximize exposure to fiction, while ignoring reality.
nobody
How could there be no material frame (body) during animation?
talking
Nature doesn't articulate sound...it moves it.
retard
There can be no retardation during animation...only a material frame ignoring to be (life) moved (inception towards death).
a) All perceivable implies same; each ones perception implies difference...others suggest likeness to distract from that.
b) Coincidence suggests "being identical in nature"; which tempts one to ignore that essence (being) is differentiated from one another within the same nature.
c) Equador aka "to make equal" aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka equalizing (equality) differences (diversity) etc.
d) Mesopotamia aka mesos (middle) potamos (river) aka being at middle (life) of river (inception towards death) aka different matter at the middle of the same motion.
resistance leaders
If resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death), then one needs to resist being led by temptation.
cowardice seems to be the root...
a) Consenting to a suggestion implies shirking of ones response-ability (free will of choice) onto another.
b) Choice needs to respond to origin (balance), while being tempted to want or not want to respond to suggested outcomes.
c) A chosen one tempts a consenting one with "coward" + "braveheart; hero; lion; champion etc." to keep responding to outcome (suggestion) over origin (perception).
Edit: a hero journey aka from zero to hero tempts one to believe that fighting towards an outcome is heroic, while not fighting is cowardly. In reality...one needs to resist (life) origin (inception towards death), while struggling with the temptation to go along.
If Mario is a hero for journeying through levels; defeating Bowser and saving Peach, then why is there one Mario came after the next with no end in sight? When Shigeru Miyamoto dies...cowards will praise him a hero and continue his legacy by playing Mario games.
Live Action Genocide Tourism
From camera-teams in Vietnam, over Hollywood style ISIS executions, to GoPro and drone footage in the Russia vs Ukraine theater of war...all eclipsed by the internet of things positioning cameras everywhere, including into the hands of those within the genocide.
Imaging a live-streamer showing drone footage of the drones hunting him to those he seeks help from...
Doing implies bringing to pass...being implies responding to be (life) passed (inception towards death). Few tempt many to wait for things to be done, while ignoring to re-do self.
One can never run out of inspiration, but driving others out of patience with information is easy...
Luck implies getting in return...that turns one against others, while tempting one to ignore what one already got.
Consider "running out of luck"...if luck gets one something along the line, then how could one run out of the line?
a) The division (dis) of onward motion (course) cannot be destroyed...the divided (life) within onward motion (inception towards death) can be tempted against each other within conflicts of reason for mutual destruction.
b) What if me taking words apart that others hold together...makes confusion clearer to see?
c) What if I didn't consent to suggested objectivism by simply adapting as subject to perceivable origin?
Can one live without trying to reach objects? Can one subject self to whatever comes along? Does objectivism contradict adaptation?
Luck contradicts choice...hence few tempting many to gamble choice on chance.
voting
Voting tempts ones choice to select a chosen one as the representative for the sustenance of self...that's suicidal.
The only connection...
...is nature setting man and woman apart from one another, hence sex/seco - "to divide".
men need to sign up for selective service
Aka selective (ones choice) service (chosen one)...slave selecting master. If men do that, then women do themselves in.
Did women help
Help raise children if men put seed into womb. They are really efficient at this...even got their own milk-jugs.
Because man goes through woman...wo(mb)man. Without man...womb extincts.
Cut and paste bot spam.
a) Community Rules: To prevent SPAM...
b) Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of...spam...may all be removed at moderator's discretion.
Why openly spam as a member of a community? Why call out another member for responding uniquely to your "cut and past bot spam"?
You just replied...
...to perceivable inspiration, while resisting the temptation of...
bot spam
...suggested information.
Labeling anything as "bot spam" affixes ones perspective onto the artificial label...nature moves; which inspires perspective to draw from change aka to adapt.
When I thank another for inspiration, then that isn't about how much (writing it) or less (copy and pasting it) labor others put into something, put simply for being a mediator (suggestion) within origin (perception)...which inspires me to labor.
Support aka sup (under) portare (to carry)
Matter (life) is carried under motion (inception towards death)...supporting each other increases the burden onto ones struggle to remain afloat.
originates from the Latin term “crimen,” which means an accusation or offense.
Accusing or offending implies one another, while ignoring that the origin of being offers (loss) charges (growth).
separating...can be interpreted as a metaphor for
Before one can shape a metaphor (figure of speech)...all sound separates into each one instrument (structured mind within).
suggests a process
Procession implies all perceivable moving through each ones perception, while a suggestion tempts ones consent to hold onto it...thereby contradicting procession.
pouring out could symbolize the release or expression of something that is inherent or natural.
Nature pours flow (inception towards death) through form (life), which allows being to come into (inception) and out of (death) origin.
EXPRESS (inherent) ION (extrinsic)...hence extrinsic action generating inherent re-actions.
crime can be seen as a deviation from societal norms that are established through collective agreement
a) Before ONE can collectively agree...ALL separated (crime/krei) each ONE from one another, which one ignores when consenting to suggested collectivism.
b) Nature doesn't generate norms...it utilizes equal (action) to generate odds (reactions), hence inspiring odd growth (life) during equal loss (inception towards death).
c) Check this out... https://www.etymonline.com/word/norm#etymonline_v_9797
Norm/gnōmōn - "carpenter's square". The compass implies logic/reason btw...
an action where something is taken
Action cannot take...only give reactions. Reactions can choose to ignore everything given (perception) for pretending to give (suggestion) and take (consent) from one another.
taken away from its original
Origin implies A WAY (inception towards death)...a wanderer (life) cannot take anything AWAY from origin; only draw out of, while being within it.
legal violations
Natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater) implies velocity aka violence (inception towards death) upon resistance (life).
Ignoring to resist by following suggested laws permits others to violate one, hence law ENFORCEment...
This act can be seen
One (matter) cannot see action (motion)...only reactions (momentum). Few suggest actors to tempt reacting many to ignore that.
to maintain order
Order (inception towards death) doesn't need to be maintained...it's steady. Chaos (life) requires maintenance, hence it being unstable.
Few suggest order out of chaos to tempt many with progressivism to order each other out of existence...hence all the chaos.
Nature implies the solution (inception towards death) to each problem (life) within...few tempt many to solve problems by seeking solutions.
Implications of Carrying Off vs. Pouring Out
Reason (vs) contradicts implication (if/then)...
Carrying Off...raises questions
Quest implies towards outcome, hence being (life) carried off (inception towards death)...raising implies resisting being carried off.
aligns more closely with natural processes
Nature processes curves (life) apart from each other during line (inception towards death)...few suggest many to follow the mainstream party-line to align curves with line aka to reduces waves made...makes piracy easier.
collective values
Evaluation (ones perception) cannot collect value (all perceivable)...since nature moves. Few tempt many to hold onto (consent) fictitious values (suggested), which nature moves out of their grasp.
Conclusion
Nature implies inclusion, hence all including each one within.
both
If energy implies all in one; then what else besides one for all and all for one?
tl;dr...again great effort. Thanks for the inspiration.
Defining Living
a) DE (completely) + FINERE (to bound, limit)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/define#etymonline_v_914
Alive implies free (choice) and partial, hence partially living within whole process of dying.
b) To define implies to affix something, while living implies temporary matter (life) within momentum (inception towards death) of ongoing motion.
c) Few suggest definition-ism... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Definitionism to tempt many to hold onto (consent) fiction (suggested) while ignoring that reality (perceivable) moves.
To explore the statement
EX (out of) PLUERE (flow), hence ex (life) pluere (inception towards death). Also; each ones state of mind (statement) within all is differentiated from one another...until many consent to hold onto suggestions by few, which equalizes differences.
being alive, characterized by...AND continual change preceding death
What if this continual change implies the ongoing process of dying as the origin of each temporary life within? AND implies an addition to, instead of the origin thereof...could that corrupt ones perspective?
social interactions
Interaction implies being reacting internally within action, and requires a setting apart of being to be able to react differently to the same action...few suggest social-ism to tempt many together, while ignoring to be a part within whole and apart from one another.
essence of living is often tied
Coming into being (essence) implies a setting apart (off-spring) aka a setting free (will of choice)...few suggest religion (Latin relgio; to bind anew) to tie the knot around many.
Inception refers to the beginning or initiation of something
Inception to life to death also implies matter within momentum of motion, hence essence coming in and out of origin.
In a broader philosophical context
a) Context contradicts broad aka con (together, with) texere (to weave)...few suggest context to weave narratives for many to bind themselves to.
b) Phi-LO-sophical implies LOgic aka a conflict of reason; confining one within two sides, while ignoring that being choice within balance implies free-dom, hence being set free (life) during dominance (inception towards death) aka free to live ones life, while dying.
it can symbolize the moment when life begins
Few suggest symbolism to tempt many to hold onto it, while ignoring that such a captured moment (symbolized by a picture taken)...implies an ongoing MOMENTum of motion.
shape an individual’s identity and purpose
a) Individual implies "within two", which contradicts being one (partial) within oneness (whole)...there can be only one. Few suggest dual-ism to tempt one to ignore self for another ones suggestion.
b) Identity/identic implies the same...being implies differentiated by one another within the same all. Few suggest Identitarianism/idealism to equalize differences among many aka hammering down the largest nail etc.
c) Few suggest progressivism to tempt many to seek purpose in outcome, while ignoring duty (resistance) during origin (velocity), hence the path of least resistance implying ones temptation to ignore resisting, while following suggested purposes towards DEATH.
inception can also relate to personal beginnings
Person aka per sonos (by sound) implies ones inception as instrument within sound. Sound was before any instrument can begin to use it...
the idea that our perceptions of reality can be influenced...It suggests that living is inherently linked
Aka suggesting a linked life to influence ones perception to ignore a flowing reality; setting forms apart from one another within.
Death signifies the end of life
Sign/sekw - "to follow"...https://www.etymonline.com/word/sign Really? How does reality signify life to follow towards death?
a natural conclusion to biological processes
a) Logic (conflict) contradicts bio (life)...hence life reasoning against other life aka "war".
b) There can be only only process...action aka motion. Only within motion can there be initiation (inception) and conclusion (death) of essence (life).
death can also represent a transition
Living within process of dying implies a trans-form-ation of essence within origin, hence flow to form (inception); form within flow (life); and form to flow (death).
an awareness of mortality that influences
That in-fluence implies formed mortal life within flowing process of dying. Aware/wer - "to perceive" is what few tempt many to ignore by influencing with suggested information.
This awareness often drives people to seek
Nature drives life towards death; hence inspiring resistance during temptation...seeking implies being tempted by outcomes to ignore the origin driving the living vessels forwards.
fulfillment
Ones mind/memory needs to process flowing inspiration, while resisting the temptation to fulfill with wanted information...few suggest information to tempt many to ignore inspiration aka holding onto inwardly, while ignoring outwardly awareness.
tl; dr...great post. Thanks for the inspiration.
Name a bigger conspiracy than...
a) Naming aka branding that which nature doesn't.
b) Conspiring aka breathing (spire) together (con).
c) Bigger than aka suggesting that anything could be bigger than perceivable.
fiat being backed by
Latin FIAT - "let it be done" from root BHEUE - "to be" implies being letting it be done by another when consenting to for example a suggested currency.
backed
Living implies being backed by inception and fronted by death...anything others are suggesting tempts one to seek backing upfront, hence ones consent TOWARDS a suggestion.
Suggestion has to be artificially build up before one, while perceivable continuously moves through ones perception from origin aka from motion, through momentum (inception towards death) into matter (life).
There can be only one tool within offense/defense (balance)...free will of choice.
Logic/logos (word) within self establishes conflicts of reason against others.
Aka form within (in) flow (ation) divided (dis) against each other.
Being alive implies being moved ACROSS (inception towards death).