1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Finances in their apogee - as an aim in themselves

The apogee of money implies suggested value; the pedigree of money implies ones consent taking it.

The trick...money has no value. A jew suggests a fictitious currency in-between the pedigree (all perceivable) and apogee (ones perception) of real current.

Apogee (ones perception) within pedigree (all perceivable) implies evaluation within value...any suggested value devalues ones evaluation.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Explain

Explain implies ex-pression (life) within plain/plane (inception towards death)...

a) Only within an impressing plain/plane can life be expressed through adaptation.

b) Ones consent holding onto suggested explanations by another implies stagnation over adaptation.

c) Nature continues to impress, which the expressing being within ignores when suppressing self by holding onto suggested explanations from another.

d) Suppression (consent towards suggested) wastes the potential of expression (adaptation within perceivable).

A jew shapes suggestions; gentiles waste potential by following those. If many waste potential, then few remain the potent expression, hence each jew erecting, while circumcising gentiles from circumference as wasted potential.

how cells divide

Cell/celare/kel - "to hide; conceal; cover"...nature reveals all through each one by dividing whole into partials, hence setting partials within action aka se-par-ation.

The suggested word "cell" tempts ones "free" will of choice to hide; conceal; cover itself.

How did I know you were going to Golem

Gollum/golem/goyim...clay in the hands of others.

Why does it have to a weapon of choice willy?

a) Weapon implies instrument (choice) of offense/defense (balance).

b) Instrument implies mind (ment) structured (stru) within (in) sound, hence each instrumental being within entire sound...defending self (life) from what's offered (inception towards death).

c) Few trick many to choose a side within a conflict of reason, which then turns weapons (choice) against each other (imbalance) aka offense versus defense (fiction)...instead defending during offer (reality).

Example...stepping into a boxing ring tempts both sides to use offense and defense against each other. The winner is being declared from outside as the one who lost less than the other, so two losers fighting each other about who wins by loosing less.

In reality...nature implies the loss offered for each ones growth, defending self from loss. The boxing ring aka the ring that binds aka circular logic within self turning into conflicts of reason against others tempts one to ignore growth for loss.

Notice furthermore that de-fence implies guarding (life) division (inception/death) aka choice within balance. Discerning self as choice (matter) within balance (momentum) implies that which offers (motion).

Offense (motion) generating de (momentum) fence (matter)...not a conflict turning against each other, but a separation during procession.

Now think about what "mending fences" implies...

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

record human brain

Only if one ignores to record aka respond (re) to heart (cordis/cor/core)...it's only through the brain that another can pull at ones heartstrings (cords), which is why ones consent "binds" one to the suggestions of another.

wave patterns

Only within a straight line (inception towards death) can there be waves (life), hence only within can there be an outline (pattern) for recognition.

The trick to exploit wave patterns implies putting one pattern (suggested information) over another (ones consent to hold onto it), which in return breaks pattern recognition within a straight line.

A recent example of how few break the pattern recognition of many...wave management in League of Legends.

emotions such as fear

Emotion aka ex (out of) meue (to push away) implies being (life) pushed (inception towards death)...fear pulls one towards outcome, hence representing the wanted temptation for one to ignore the need to resist origin.

A jew suggests fear-ism aka terror-ism to tempt each consenting terror-ist to become afraid of outcomes...which in return tempts gentiles to ignore perceivable origin.

brains function at a Hz...

Aka a Hz/hertz/herz - "heart"...mentally ignoring that hertz/hurts...

frequency

Aka frequent/bhrekw - "to cram together"...notice that a collapsing heart resists being crammed together.

Notice how spirit (to breathe) needs to resist the wanted temptation to hold onto the force flowing through one. How? Breathing out what was forced into aka releasing self from that which crams together.

One can only see (cy) cramming together (frequent) while being apart from others...

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Prophets

Prophet aka per (forwards) bha (to speak)...only sound forwards; speech implies a return, and what prophets are sooth-saying tempts ones consent to follow along sound, while turning against each other, hence true vs false reasoning.

false prophets among us

US aka united states implies prophet aka the forward spoken suggestion tempting each ONEs consent to join with one another.

Among implies amidst aka one within the middle of all, hence a separation apart; not a unification together.

suggesting to do rituals

Rite of passage (inception towards death) establishes differences (life), hence... https://www.wordhippo.com/what-is/the-opposite-of/ritual.html

Rite implies the procession of all perceivable through each ones perception, while any suggestion is tempting ones consent to hold onto it...stagnation (suggested) during procession (perceivable).

that evil is a mandatory part of life

Mandatory implies manus (hand) dare (to give), hence all giving each one a hand aka auto (inception towards death) generating manual (life).

Manus implies partial; dare implies whole...only within given, can there be a hand to take.

Good vs evil implies ones manual free will of choice...binding itself to a suggested side by another.

pure self love

Love vs hate implies a conflict among impurities. Only within pure natural order, can impure chaos be shaped. Self implies the perpetuation of impurities through one another by sexual inter-course for off-spring...a seedy; oily and bloody separation of impurities from one another.

astrology

  • People they come together
  • People they fall apart
  • No one can stop us now
  • Cause we are all made of stars

Logy/logic (circular logic within self turning into conflicts of reason against another) binds luminous points (stars) together.

witch talk

Witch/wicce/wicca - "soothsayer" implies talking aka shaping suggested words within perceivable sound aka spell-craft.

Nature moves all sound apart into each one instrumental being.

  • When every choice that I make is yours
  • Keep telling me what's right and what's wrong
  • Don't you ever stop to think about me
  • I'm not that blind to see that you've been cheating on me
  • All you do to me is talk, talk... https://genius.com/Talk-talk-talk-talk-lyrics
1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

pushing porn

Only nature pushes (inception) and pulls (death)...a jew suggests porn/pornē/per - "to traffic in, to sell" to tempt gentile consent to prostitute itself when buying into it.

Consenting (to buy) to a suggestion (to sell) implies "push coming to shove"...

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

l,we are all

I implies one taking possession of self, while ignoring moving potential.

WE implies one joining others by holding onto suggested pluralism, while ignoring that all separates each one from one another.

I and WE cannot be all; since I implies you, and we implies they. One cannot take possession of self (I) or join others (we) without establishing a division (in-divi-dual) aka a conflict of reason (I vs you + we vs them).

aspects of the Father

Entirety (motion; father) > partition (momentum; mother) > aspect (matter; child).

to make our way back to the Garden

a) MAKE implies the magic few are utilizing to tempt many together.

b) OUR implies both joining others and taking possession.

c) WAY implies being (life) moved (inception towards death) across the only way, hence in (inception) and out (death) of origin.

d) It's the only way (process of dying) which BACKS each wanderer (living). Motion implies the inspiring foundation at the back of resisting matter, yet also the ongoing temptation to ignore resisting.

e) Garden/gher - "to grasp" implies ones free will of choice gardening whatever one chooses to grow, while struggling with the temptation to hold within ones grasp, and thereby choke the life out it.

To garden implies tending/tendere - "to stretch"...

f) Eden/edhen - "to delight" aka division (momentum) of light (motion), which the gardener (matter) has to tend...

A being implies ray (matter) within visible spectrum (momentum) of light (motion). If one stretches the ray/race/radius, then one feels de-lighted, hence within the garden of eden.

https://genius.com/Frankie-vaughan-the-garden-of-eden-lyrics

  • The Garden of Eden
  • Tells you she is forbidden
  • Can you leave her there

hint

A hint implies a suggestion bringing to mind, which tempts one to ignore that all perceivable moves through ones mind, which in return allows ones mind to respond to being brought.

It cannot be done alone

a) All does so that each being can be..."cannot" implies a suggested distraction thereof.

b) Alone implies all(in)one aka all forwarding one, and each one being forwarded within all.

c) Few tempt many together by tricking each to feel "alone", hence feel separated from one another. Many together in return permit few to remain apart... https://www.amazon.com/People-Apart-Europe-1789-1939-History/dp/0198219806

A chosen one stands alone, and each chosen one resists being collectivized together.

thoughts for us

To think implies processing input for expression, hence a separation. It's during that perceivable procession that one gets tempted to hold onto suggested input.

Holding onto contradicts thinking; corrupts memory; conceals mind from perceivable input, and confines free will of choice by binding self to suggested input, shaped by another.

God has thoughts for us that take more than one person to congniz3.

a) More than one contradicts God. There can be only one.

b) US implies ones consent to suggested pluralism; TAKE implies ones consent taking a suggestion; COGNIZE implies perceiving (gnoscere) together (co)...a contradiction of all perceivable separating each ones perception from one another.

You are being tricked into trying to puzzle input together aka trying to stick together that which God sets apart. That's tikkun olam, that's you being judaized to destroy yourself and others.

Working together contradicts work (energy) setting apart (force) internally.

If God moves; then movement implies minds being moved apart from one another, hence each one being enabled to mentally process all input.

Having a mind implies "amend" aka to supply (inception towards death) a defect (life).

Salvation takes

Salva (to save) tion (action)...action cannot be saved. Action gives (inception) and takes (death) reactions (life).

"Salvation is mine, says the lord" implies action saving reactions, hence no temporary reaction can be wasted within ongoing action.

Save/sol - "whole"...being implies partial within whole. Few suggest many to seek salvation, which tempts partials back into whole.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

is composed of vibration (oscillatory and trembling movement), wave (propagation), frequency (wave behavior), rhythm (harmonious organization), mathematics (precision and engineering), and energy (force)

a) Energy doesn't compose (positions together) it sets vibration; wave; frequency; rhythm; mathematics etc. apart from one another.

b) Energy implies the internal/inherent separation of impressing (action; motion) and expressing (reaction; matter) force, with force implying forwarding (inception towards death) strength (life).

c) Movement implies ones mind reacting to being moved as choice within balance, hence oscillatory movement (to and fro), with choice implying the tremble aka momentary hesitation of temporary matter (life) during momentum (inception towards death) of ongoing motion.

d) A wave implies temporal growth (life) during ongoing loss (inception towards death). The struggle of a wave to sustain itself implies the temptation to wave/weave with another.

e) Frequency implies adaptation; behavior implies stagnation, hence "being having" implying a taking into possession, while ignoring the movement of potential.

f) Harmonious implies hurting (harm) one (oni)...

g) Energy implies dis (momentum) organ (matter) ation (motion)...it's few within which organize many together by suggestion to harm each consenting one.

h) All implies one in energy, hence addition of one (inception); subtraction of one (death); multiplication of one (intercourse for off-spring) and division of one (living within process of dying).

Few suggest math to mow down each one among many. How? If one counts others, then one burdens self with the sum of all things counted, while being held accountable by others as ones accountants.

i) Having free will of choice implies being set loose...precision confines choice. One needs to resist the wanted temptation to hold onto "my precious". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iz-8CSa9xj8&themeRefresh=1

j) Nature implies the energizing engine; each being within implies a re-energizing part thereof aka an implement; a device; a tool; a weapon of choice.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Make/magic/mason/match/mingle/mongrel/mag - "to knead, fashion, fit"... it's ones consent taking the suggested "job" which makes the magic happen, hence behold implying "being holding onto".

Everything moves, so if a being holds onto another ones suggestion, then everything (perceivable) is being ignored for nothing (suggested), with nothing representing ones de-nial (nihilo; nothing) of perceivable for suggested.

In short: to make implies putting together; to be implies as partial within separation of whole.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

a) Being implies BE-IN...an internal separation.

b) IS implies WAS from the perspective of each being, since if a being IS, then it WAS coming into being before. Aka if life; then inception thereof...an energetic transfer.

Any suggested IS tempts one to ignore all perceivable WAS. Why? Because if a being holds onto suggested; then it ignores that perceivable moves.

c) Notice your use of "not" and "being" aka "to be or not to be"...a Shakespeare play within which Hamlet contemplates suicide, used by few to tempt many into consenting to nihil-ism.

Not contradicts being...contradiction can only exist within one being by turning against (contra) another being.

d) Instead of proclaiming what is not energy...ask yourself what energizes "nothing"?

e) Energy/energos/ergon - "active; work"...only if work was active, can each being react by working.

As for the opposite of work...idle/idol. That's ones ignorance of all working for idolizing employment to another, hence employing ones mind to hold onto a job offer.

Job implies "piece of work; something to be done" aka a partial within whole, not the whole work.

f) Everything aka ever/aiw - "vital force; life" + thing/tenk - "to stretch", hence all stretching (inception towards death) each one (life)...a process of vitalization by animation.

4
free-will-of-choice 4 points ago +4 / -0

to create an entire prison

Entire sets each partial within free...consenting by "free" will of choice to suggested creationism binds one to another.

Prison/pris - "taken"...taking suggested gives up being free within perceivable.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

confusing wordplay with reality

a) Con-fuse implies fusing together...I take apart.

b) Few shape words to tempt many to play with spells.

c) Ones RE-sponse to ALL (real) perceivable, gets confusing when playing spells with suggested words.

mental illness

a) A mind adapting to perceivable inspiration implies at-ease...a mind holding onto suggested information implies dis-ease.

b) Ill (short for ev-il) implies a dis-ease of mind aka a conflict of reason (good vs evil) established by ones choice to hold onto a suggested side. Only letting go of either side puts ones mind at-ease, and ones choice within balance.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

a) Thinking alike implies homogenization of thought aka consent by many to suggested information by few. Thinking apart implies all perceivable inspiration moving through each ones perception.

b) Apostle/apostellein - "to send away" implies each being send (life) away (inception towards death) through separation.

Few suggest apostles as messengers carrying a message (mess-ianic-age) to many, which in return tempts many to collectivize within church-masses, while ignoring the body of each christened (annointed) being set apart from one another.

Message/messianic/messiah/mashiah - "anointed".

Sleight of hand: "don't shoot the messenger" ...messenger (inception towards death) sending message (life) + shoot (thrust forwards; discharge).

Living within the process of dying requires one to re-charge during dis (inception towards death) charge (life).

In short...apostles artificially tempt masses together (homogenize); nature separates critics from one another.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

abortion is a jewish sacrament

Abort/aboard-tion aimed at the birth/berth of a vessel (life) within sea (inception towards death) implies piracy aka robbing on the high seas aka high-way robbery.

Sacrament implies "division of mind", hence from whole sound through each partial instru-ment.

To abort implies "to miscarry in giving birth"...only nature gives (inception) and takes (death), and each one within struggles to resist the temptation of wanting to hold onto what nature gives, which one needs to let go while nature takes it back.

One does not "give" birth...nature gives inception by dividing each life (off-spring) within the process of dying. Neither can one carry "birth" since nature takes any carried burden from one.

baby murder

a) Murder/mer - "to rub away"...each child coming through the birth-channel implies an anointed one (rubbed with oil). A jew tempts gentiles into conflicts of reason against one another, which "rubs away" each ones anointment aka rubbery/robbery.

Reason implies murder.

b) Baby aka baby-lon aka bab (gate) ilu (god). Whole implies the gate through which each partial (life) passes through (inception towards death)...by the rivers of babylon.

https://genius.com/Boney-m-rivers-of-babylon-lyrics

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Autistic...

Did you knew that the jew who allegedly coined autism (Eugene Bleuler) and the alleged jewish father of psychoanalysis (Sigismund Schlomo Freud) were conspiring to conquer psychiatry? https://img.gvid.tv/i/3gc1x1nk.jpg

blaming jews for literally everything

a) A jew utilizes literacy (suggested words) to distract gentiles from everything (perceivable sound)...aka spell-craft.

Sound (Latin sanus) - "entire; unbroken; whole" implies the foundation for each insane (in sanus; within sound) person (per sonos; by sound) coming into being within.

The jewish literal suggestion "insane person" tempts gentiles to imagine mental issues within each other...that's how spell-craft works.

b) A jew inverts everything perceivable by suggesting "nothing"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQnaRtNMGMI

c) According to a jew: "It's the deepest impulse of a jewish soul to pull at the very fabric of life until there's nothing left but a thread. They want nothing but nothingness"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRUjy1Dhx-k

accidents don’t exist

Accident implies by CHANCE aka "the effect of an unknown cause"...being implies CHOICE aka the effect (life) of a known cause (inception towards death).

A jew suggests chance to tempt each gentile to gamble "ones choice" on a "chosen ones" suggestion.

Nature implies balance; each being within implies choice...chance implies choice imbalacing itself by inclining towards another choice (suggestion), while ignoring balance (perception).

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

doubled

There can be only one. Double implies folding one into two...ones consent to any suggested logo implies logos aka circular logic turning one against another within conflicts of reason aka a duel/dual.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

for not understanding

Standing under contradicts being "free" will of choice.

kicked out of local

The local (position) of choice implies at the center of balance...others cannot kick one out of center; only tempt one into a conflict of reason by suggesting sides. If ones choice inclines towards any suggested side, then one imbalances self.

church

Church/kerke/keue - "to swell" implies each ones rise (life) during fall (inception towards death), hence church representing the "body of Christ".

enough is enough

Being implies one (partial) within all (whole)...whole offers partials always more than can be taken.

Ones struggle to sustain self is based on needing to resist wanted temptation, hence if one takes, then nothing will ever be enough, yet if ones resists to take, then one knows when enough was enough.

converse within the social confines

If ONE (singular) consents to suggested pluralism (con; soc);then one con-fines self to others.

Only within ALL (god) can ONE (christ) be free from one another...as long as one resists the temptations of others, which implies each ones free will of choice.

you are merely script NPCing this shit to others

a) A non-player cannot adapt by free will of choice to perceivable inspiration.

b) About free-will-of-choice: Post Score (0)...no scripture was offered by me toward others. Those who get offended chose to take an offer I didn't make.

Which makes you ignorant and irritating.

Nature irritates (inception towards death) reactions (life)...I simple make it harder for others to continue ignoring that.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

a) Peace/piece implies each partial (one) within whole (all) separated from one another.

b) There cannot be "all the people"...only each one person within all. If one accumulates "all" the people together, there's still the ongoing natural order separating each person from one another before the choice to accumulate together can be made.

c) Imagination implies IMAGE (imagi) of NATIVE (nat) within ACTION (ion).

Action implies all perceivable; native implies each ones perception...image implies the suggestion of another tempting one to ignore perception.

d) One cannot imagine all, because all separates each one from one another, which allows ones sight to see moving differences aka perceivable inspiration.

e) An image/picture implies a "captured moment"...perceivable momentum (inception towards death) cannot be held onto by ones perception (life). Matter cannot hold onto motion...others suggest the image of matter to distract one from being moved.

Example...if one sees ones child, while remembering/imagining the birth of the child, then one ignores the perceivable child (reality) for a suggested image of birth (fiction).

Remembering represents a misappropriation of memory, which the happy merchant of temptation shaped into an embezzlement scheme.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

we look into people that are harming us

a) Any harm from another moves through one...if one looks/locks onto the suggested information by others, then one harms self.

b) Few suggest pluralism (we the people) to tempt many together, which in return harms each one living within such a collective. That's why few life at ease while many are suffering.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Con-spire (breathing together)...Christ (to anoint) implies ones parting breath. A conspiracy against Christ.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

God's providence and nothing else

Pro (forwards) videre (to see) implies a separation of the forwarding God and each being enabled to see within.

Suggested nihil-ism (nihilo, nothing) tempts a consenting nihil-ist to ignore everything forwarding through each ones sight.

Nothing contradicts providence.

no bearing

Bearing trust implies carrying along bondage; which constricts ones movement, for which one needs to bear the consequences.

will end no matter what and Christ will come

a) What if Christ implies matter wielding will?

b) What if christen - "to anoint" implies the coming into being of each anointed one, wielding free will of choice among each other?

c) What if Christ implies each ones living sentence from beginning (inception) towards end (death)? Living in-between origin and outcome requires adaptation by choice, right?

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

imagine

a) Image/imitari - "to copy, imitate" implies the artificial representation of nature.

b) Describing ones imagination implies a division (de) of scripture (scrib)...that's the written artifice distracting from the moving nature. Before one can describe imagination to others; one inscribes images into self by consenting to the suggested information by others.

It's ones consent to John Lennon's suggestion, which permits another to shape ones imagination. John Lennon and the Beatles were directed to enact jewish pop-music for popular appeal among gentile imagination.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

there is something to a self fulfilling prophecy

Prophecy aka pro (forwards) bha (to speak) implies a) speaking words while being (life) forwarded (inception towards death) within sound, and b) that another outside of self suggested the language one uses to speak words forwards.

As for fulfilling...all implies full, each one (life) within implies getting filled (inception) and drained (death). Self implies the intercourse in-between each one being moved forwards and apart from one another.

One can sabotage what they have control over

Control implies "rolled together", hence few gaining control over by sabotaging many to willingly stand under aka letting themselves be controlled.

a president can have a greater effect

To preside over implies a submission under by those allowing others to preside over them. In this case...the shirking of response-ability (choice) by voting representative choices aka chosen ones over ones choice.

Nature implies cause; each being within implies effect...each being to one another implies "affection". If one allows self to be affected by another, then one ignores cause, which implies deadly effects for ones living being.

Enough people of like mind can have a profound effect

Effect implies "execution or completion of an act" aka nature enacting (inception towards death) the executing completion of each reacting sentence (life).

Tempting enough people together increases the potential for the complete execution of each person within. A like mind implies a hive mind aka a gentile mind used as a jewish toilet for the accumulation of constipation.

Nature sets each mind apart from one another to allow mental expression outwards during spiritual impression inwards.

Holding onto suggested information constipates: adapting to perceivable inspiration releases constipation.

3
free-will-of-choice 3 points ago +3 / -0

a) Catchphrase; truther influencer; movie trailer aka hook; line and sinker.

b) Premise: forming a collective consciousness to make a difference. Well...joining a collective destroys each different being, which is called homogenization aka a jewish suggestion mixing gentile consent together to equalize differences aka to heal the world by bringing together (tikkun olam).

c) Notice that the child next to the alleged pederast is operating a ball/baal to manipulate time. That's circular reasoning within the minds of consenting gentiles being freely manipulated, into any which direction, by jewish suggestions from outside.

d) Inception; life; death do not represent past; present; future...but each ones living PRESENCE carried within a moving nature.

Sleight of hand: "time is of the essence"...esse implies being, hence if a being ignores its own presence for suggested states (past; present; future), then those suggesting it can "stem the tide of time" by manipulating all "three" states "one" ignores about time/tīdi/da aka to divide/dwo - "two".

There can be only one, hence the other alleged pederast quote: "energy cannot be created or destroyed"...

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

access to classified data

To classify implies "making divisions common"...a process of equalization. Nature implies a process of division making unique beings.

Ones consent to suggested data permits suggesting few to classify consenting many, which in return is used to deny access to more data until permission fees are paid.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›