a) Do you realize how few surrounding a celebrity care about anything underneath the product?
b) Do you realize that signing contracts with others constricts the signer? It's called a "golden cage"...
c) A jew influences gentiles with suggested information, which in return tempts consenting gentiles to ignore both the influencer and the directing "hidden hand" above the influencer, for the suggested information.
Millions of skater-boys spanking their meat to Avril Lavigne memorabilia only know her image from imagination, which makes them spell-bound idolater who ignore reality for artificial delusions shaped by others.
Thanks; that's the one I was thinking of. Anyway...gild/guilt, hence "guilt by association" aka ones consent to the suggestion of another or in the case of celebrities...the Faustian deal.
where he or she has very little freedom
Liberty. Being choice (free) within balance (dom) is always available. It's ones willing ignorance of perceivable for suggested, which puts one at liberty to another, while binding self.
a) Do you realize how few surrounding a celebrity care about anything underneath the product?
b) Do you realize that signing contracts with others constricts the signer? It's called a "golden cage"...
c) A jew influences gentiles with suggested information, which in return tempts consenting gentiles to ignore both the influencer and the directing "hidden hand" above the influencer, for the suggested information.
Millions of skater-boys spanking their meat to Avril Lavigne memorabilia only know her image from imagination, which makes them spell-bound idolater who ignore reality for artificial delusions shaped by others.
*see platos "gilded cage" (ˈɡɪldɪd keɪdʒ ) noun. a place where someone appears to live in luxury but where he or she has very little freedom.
Thanks; that's the one I was thinking of. Anyway...gild/guilt, hence "guilt by association" aka ones consent to the suggestion of another or in the case of celebrities...the Faustian deal.
Liberty. Being choice (free) within balance (dom) is always available. It's ones willing ignorance of perceivable for suggested, which puts one at liberty to another, while binding self.
Ethical individualism
Consenting to a suggested -ism puts one into (in) a division (divi) of two (dual), hence into a conflict of reason...an ethical corruption.
Ethos (perception) within pathos (perceivable) needs to resist the wanted temptation of logos (suggested).