Thanks; that's the one I was thinking of. Anyway...gild/guilt, hence "guilt by association" aka ones consent to the suggestion of another or in the case of celebrities...the Faustian deal.
where he or she has very little freedom
Liberty. Being choice (free) within balance (dom) is always available. It's ones willing ignorance of perceivable for suggested, which puts one at liberty to another, while binding self.
Thanks; that's the one I was thinking of. Anyway...gild/guilt, hence "guilt by association" aka ones consent to the suggestion of another or in the case of celebrities...the Faustian deal.
Liberty. Being choice (free) within balance (dom) is always available. It's ones willing ignorance of perceivable for suggested, which puts one at liberty to another, while binding self.
Ethical individualism
Consenting to a suggested -ism puts one into (in) a division (divi) of two (dual), hence into a conflict of reason...an ethical corruption.
Ethos (perception) within pathos (perceivable) needs to resist the wanted temptation of logos (suggested).