0
Ep0ch 0 points ago +1 / -1

Nope it started on the Arab Spring.

-4
Ep0ch -4 points ago +4 / -8

You're an idiot. You watched The King's Man. Spoiler he was Scottish.

KM are nonsense.

At this point it's a psyop anybody peddling it and flat earth are obvious shills.

The psyop inserts a history that was virtually never there. So it replaces history inserting itself. The Op. They just have to make the gullible believe it. Or kill, that population has dropped by 20 million, half already.

0
Ep0ch 0 points ago +1 / -1

What's the context. It's an accusation, they're the Israeli SDF. Because they're on Israel's ambassador to the Ukraine's tweet.

WTF?

Gossip is what it is. No other brains here.

Let me know when you prove they're Israeli. It still don't prove anything. It could've been another high-school pantomime. Hahaha. No. Obviously not. It ain't in Israeli.

-1
Ep0ch -1 points ago +2 / -3

What does the video prove? Click bait. Is it Ukraine? Is it Israel? Are they actors.

I'm gonna say it's Ukrainians. That probability is what. High. How high. 80%.

Features are. Ambassador in the Ukraine posted a video with footage not from today. The uniforms can be bought anywhere.

It proves what? Where is the context it was posted in regards towards, and why?

Israel didn't accept Ukrainian refugees admittedly either. Are they now. So tell me why Israelis are singing that song in another language. Because of a supposed uniform?

https://www.timesofisrael.com/over-12000-ukrainian-refugees-in-israel-with-some-8000-ineligible-for-citizenship/

Honk

0
Ep0ch 0 points ago +2 / -2

I have no idea how the NFL works, except it's corrupt, anything with betting is.

Does Swift change the game, no, simply adds to it.

When betting, yawn. Here there's no return. The statistics are practically the same against each other. Obviously Chiefs are Favs, superbowl winners. But individual record against is surprising. It comes down to Home and Away. Jets tend to win at home against the Chiefs.

But at 200/1 to win the Superbowl. Instead of Chiefs 6/1. It becomes an exercise in what bet you fancy, if you're picking the team to win. No real money on that stake unless you're going into debt. Score, scorers, spread on the winning games played on the day.

Any sport with betting on it is corrupted to hell. Who knows how that works except the Mafia.

0
Ep0ch 0 points ago +1 / -1

Jews. It is what has just happened here. They've inserted themselves into it. This forum is playing out an anomaly I could not figure out. Until that probability becomes who knows. But wasn't Stalin a Tartar?

The Tartars were horselords, nomadic and still across much of the Steppes today. Huge area. Buffer between Mongol and Islam. Were parts of both, but are separate and older. They sacked Moscow before the Mongols. After Mongol collapse, Islam spread. The Ottomans obviously had a chunk of them. The area on that link except it's wrong. Russia had parts of Ukraine. But no not all. Russia also warred against them specifically, expanding East, and some were even giants. They also joined Russia against the Ottomans. China has also expanded directly into them, North West. Where China used to be quite different.

They're still present on the Steppes, some is being erased with the Uighurs former Mongols.

Here it's seemingly a Jewish psyop. An insertion. Laughably only gullible believe it.

In another topic I argued are they remnants of Sythians, Alexander the Great, Huns.

Mounted warriors, by creed, yes their religion was bathed in blood and blood ritual. The bow, the scimitar, the horse. Warriors for millennia's, Nimrod.

The Mongols also helped spread Islam.

0
Ep0ch 0 points ago +2 / -2

Where are they playing?

If the Jets are at home? They have a good chance.

It ain't nothing to do with that. But the statistics. Their record, against each other. It comes down to Home and Away. Not voodoo. The Jets at Home have a great record against the Chiefs. Like the Chiefs at their home against the Jets.

The Jets won't win the league. The league just started so it's open season. All to play for. Despite the Chiefs being a superbowl favourite.

The statistics. There's not much in it. A bigger return on the Jets.

Who knows. Bigger bet is on the league winner. Or a spread bet, selection, individual score/scorers. Not archaic rivalry.

1
Ep0ch 1 point ago +2 / -1

Thank you my friend. They were Tartars. Then Ottomans. Then Russians.

They were also possibly Sythians.

The Tartars are largely Islamic not Jewish from the past Ottoman rule.

1
Ep0ch 1 point ago +2 / -1

Thank you my friend. I agree. This I am finding fascinating. I am very self taught. When I research I try to dive through it. History is a conspiracy. The eye of the believer. A narrative of its Victor's.

However there is anomaly here.

Calling the Tartars, past Sythians, formerly Nimrod, something else. Khazars.

When the region it had Empirical rule. It obviously had hierarchy. It did when it converted. If we go through history. Perhaps Turkic, Babylonian, Greek, Odesa a Greek name, Roman, Holy Roman, Ottoman, Russian.

There are no camels. And Jews. Yes the Jewish people spread on the destruction of Jerusalem.

0
Ep0ch 0 points ago +1 / -1

That doesn't explain shit. It's fictitious. What was a Khazar. Not reading that shit? Tell me exactly what they are.

The Ukrainian Royalty canonised by the Romans founding Moscow from the former Greeks founding the Ukraine? Not Jews. Jews are a myth. A modern myth. They were Hebrews. They got destroyed by Rome. They didn't colonised anywhere else. Apart from spreading out into founded domiciles of other kingdoms. Are they a horde of Barbarians? Or what?

I've provided history I can back up. You've provided fiction. Anybody looking at the time period and simply Google the period reading maps and history and otherwise. If they can research, instead of using the book of fables the bible, or an amusingly fragmented education, claiming there's no such thing as Kiev because chickens didn't exist. No sir, it was called the Khazar. The what?

But okay for the sake of their glorious mudhuts along the Dniper. It was a tiny little region of past Empirical rule. Constantly ravished by the horde, and any Empires, not Khazarian.

Today who knows what their claim is. It's completely ironic.

0
Ep0ch 0 points ago +1 / -1

Hahaha. That was confronting. No I am not American, I'm English.

But we're talking history not mythology. Mythology you've based your educational pretext on. It ain't factual. The Bible fundamentally isn't. Nadda, zilch, baloney, and irony. Rewritten, rephrased, gibberish, an adaptation off of surrounding lore.

0
Ep0ch 0 points ago +1 / -1

I have no idea what Khazaria was. Because it weren't Jewish. It was Greek. Greeks spread Christainity later as well.

Are the two similar is a much bigger conspiracy, we won't go there. The New Testament was written by Greeks. Surely rewritten again we won't go there. Who was what, is what. What was.

But historically the Black Sea was fully colonised. Bulgarian ruins are some of the oldest in Europe, we're talking well into the stone age. Outside of Turkey. Of course Georgian go back a very long time, the earliest winemakers dating back 10k years. They show huge evidence of land washed away. Settlements up the Black Sea gone. Like the Minoans. But they're supposedly later.

However this whole Khazaria nonsense is gibberish. Utter fucking rubbish. Perhaps I've heard of the Khazars but weren't they Tartars. Dunno don't care. Can't be bothered.

Romans used Ukraine like the Greeks before them for agriculture. Agreed it might be older, but Odesa, the oldest city in Ukraine, was supposedly founded during the Greeks. Of course both the Huns and Mongols decimated it. Then it was largely Ottoman. Then Imperial Russian because breakaway Tartars offered the coast to the Russians as a protectorate. We know what happened afterwards.

I've done this in another topic Russia, Moscow, was founded by Greek missionaries, from the Ukraine, Ukrainian royalty, cannonised by the Holy Roman Empire, Centralised Moscow as the choice of rule. Later Czars were born. Otherwise there were wars against the horde. Huns, Tartars, Mongols, and Viking conversion.

To be honest and I don't mean to be antisemitic. What is a jew? Some mythological pretext. The Hebrew, Israelite is largely an assumption, a paradox, becoming, after the fall of Babylon. Coexisting alongside the Greeks who destroyed Tyre and effectively birthed Alexandria.

0
Ep0ch 0 points ago +1 / -1

I dunno but it stops real quick on change of policy. Both candidates of the GOP, Trump the favourite candidate currently, he's like 7/4, Biden 9/4. Want to halt it significantly. Of course it is light years away. Tucker is right, there's a lot of drama prior. Who knows.

Different policy changes that flow.

Why the fuck it ever got there is beyond sanity. But it is. It faster stops. Or who knows today, conflict is as ugly.

0
Ep0ch 0 points ago +1 / -1

West of the Mississippi was two big wars. The Indians, who had a portion of the Great Plains, and the Spanish. A succession of wars against the Spanish. Of course the Civil war.

The Civil war was the main war that centralised America, and pushed it out further, like its former war of Independence.

Independence gained the Mississippi or importantly colonisation West of the Appalachians.

Alaska losts thousands colonising it. Digging the river to Anchorage. Etc.

Got people West is the larger cities were flooding with immigrants, first stop New York, and many worked the plantations and factories indentured into chain gangs, the South are slavers, steal their gold. Simply to tax separately governed states who still held power. Pushing expansion further. Power centralised into a standing army that became a global superpower. Fighting effectively non stop since.

America would be different nations if the South won. Possibly 3 or 4 in its landmass. Mexico would've been much bigger. Larger parts of Texas, New Mexico, California etc. Canada different etc.

The myth is people just pitched up and settled. They worked a debt gaining a deed to colonise. Settlers bought passage. Often working debts for any land they colonised. Many immigrants were prisoners. Until they simply became taxed. Of course they were also sold gold rushes, or land auctions. Many of these were in places like the Great Plains offering cheap real estate. These often became mafias. Some were as brutal as the indentured plantations and factories.

Then it started conscription. Of course it had the dust bowl.

0
Ep0ch 0 points ago +2 / -2

No. Mass migration stops real quick if a republican becomes president.

It also stops if the USA goes into a war it put boots on the ground in numbers. Borders close.

Am I missing anything? Simple change of policy, causes it to significantly stop. Significantly. Permits, passes, checks and declarations of entry.

3
Ep0ch 3 points ago +4 / -1

When was the last time Zelenskyy was even in the Ukraine? It's an even bigger illusion.

How many personnel are from other nations? Of course that problem becomes their power structure. It isn't NATO. It's running through system installing who knows. With a supposed president that's never there. This is what I cannot figure out, that flight back and forth. In one of the most deadly wars in decades. Potentially the most dangerous, nukes, and advanced weapons. But every 5 minutes are all these people visiting Kiev. Something is very weird. As thousands and thousands and thousands are dying.

You've never seen this in any other conflict. Never. Ever.

If they appoint her what's that risk. Another illusion. She won't even be in the nation.

As everybody says hang on. Kids that person. A person who every time she gets pregnant she kills it. And paints blood and guts and bullshit everywhere. Non Ukrainian. Insane.

But they couldn't give a shit. Thousands and thousands and thousands dying. Sent to death. Women are as well. If they gave a shit. It would've been peace. It wouldn't have destroyed them. Now it's a big stalemate. Where thousands and thousands more will die this winter. It's gonna freeze.

6
Ep0ch 6 points ago +7 / -1

Pig's blood cooks up thoughts of pain and suffering? But it's okay kids. How does it makes you feel. Honk.

If you don't believe in all the other displays of cannibalism, and the macabre.

Leave kids alone. Anybody without kids, shouldn't be an ambassador for them. She's far worse. She's aborted 3 times. Otherwise hates them.

2
Ep0ch 2 points ago +5 / -3

Most cops are complete dumbasses. Complete dumbasses. But you have to comply. No matter how dumb they are. They've been getting so much dumber today. Utterly dumb. Never met so many dumb cops in my borough, training college right there. The dumbest cops. Arrogant, bullies, stupid. Stupid on a scale not seen since Sherlock Holmes. Technology has made them stupid. Wokism has made them dumb. The dumbest cops. How are they even cops.

I've seen 5.5ft cops. How is that warrant officer? Because that idiot wasn't going to arrest anyone. A woke and gay ex humanities lawyer turned cop. Talked like a queer. But you turned up on a potential warrant. You started arguing the criminal's rights. Then they all lie when they're investigated.

As soon as a firearms officer stops the threat. What went wrong.

Today cops have become the dumbest I have ever seen cops. Cops used to have a level of discretion, and common sense. Today they're becoming dumber than dixie. The stupidest.

They're no longer employing a standard height and fitness either. 5ft cops. This skinny little paki cop. 5.3. Imagine 10x 5.3 cops turned up to arrest a black 6.5 guy. Not happening. They'd need multiple tasers, a helicopter, another 10 cops. What the fuck are you doing? Fat girl chav cop talking like a common gutter rat. So badly. How did you get selected? Numbers, diversity. Until that training has gotten so bad.

Then they start questioning them every 5 minutes everytime they actually do their job. You would with what's passing for cops today.

1
Ep0ch 1 point ago +2 / -1

Bias operating system. It is A.I behind its queers. Trans wouldn't exist without A.I

by DrLeaks
0
Ep0ch 0 points ago +1 / -1

Hahaha. No.

0
Ep0ch 0 points ago +1 / -1

Is it causing the mass migration? Because the cellphone is

0
Ep0ch 0 points ago +1 / -1

It triggers stuff. You're right. There is apart from the Brown note, fiction. The tear jerker.

They play the tearjerker in those soppy films. It's always the same note. Watch girls. Why are you crying. Dunno, dunno. It's so sad. No, it's the music. The note keeps playing. Wahaaa. Seen it at a club once. People started crying. But it's normally combined into the other sense of the film. It combines into the note and causes the effect. But it's the same frequency range, note/s, causing the tearjerker.

There are others that can possibly cause rage, but these are perhaps far more subtle. I am sure they fucked with it in the MK ultra programs.

Normally the signal needs more than just its decibels. Conditioning, and sight.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›