Hahaha. That was confronting. No I am not American, I'm English.
But we're talking history not mythology. Mythology you've based your educational pretext on. It ain't factual. The Bible fundamentally isn't. Nadda, zilch, baloney, and irony. Rewritten, rephrased, gibberish, an adaptation off of surrounding lore.
Thank you my friend. I agree. This I am finding fascinating. I am very self taught. When I research I try to dive through it. History is a conspiracy. The eye of the believer. A narrative of its Victor's.
However there is anomaly here.
Calling the Tartars, past Sythians, formerly Nimrod, something else. Khazars.
When the region it had Empirical rule. It obviously had hierarchy. It did when it converted. If we go through history. Perhaps Turkic, Babylonian, Greek, Odesa a Greek name, Roman, Holy Roman, Ottoman, Russian.
There are no camels. And Jews. Yes the Jewish people spread on the destruction of Jerusalem.
Hahaha. That was confronting. No I am not American, I'm English.
But we're talking history not mythology. Mythology you've based your educational pretext on. It ain't factual. The Bible fundamentally isn't. Nadda, zilch, baloney, and irony. Rewritten, rephrased, gibberish, an adaptation off of surrounding lore.
Thank you my friend. I agree. This I am finding fascinating. I am very self taught. When I research I try to dive through it. History is a conspiracy. The eye of the believer. A narrative of its Victor's.
However there is anomaly here.
Calling the Tartars, past Sythians, formerly Nimrod, something else. Khazars.
When the region it had Empirical rule. It obviously had hierarchy. It did when it converted. If we go through history. Perhaps Turkic, Babylonian, Greek, Odesa a Greek name, Roman, Holy Roman, Ottoman, Russian.
There are no camels. And Jews. Yes the Jewish people spread on the destruction of Jerusalem.