3
DrMarmot 3 points ago +3 / -0

Time will tell, and I hope we face a different future, but it requires unity.

3
DrMarmot 3 points ago +3 / -0

Another theory is that the global power structure is confident enough about their plans that they don't care about any new "soldiers of truth" or "voices of reason" coming into the public sphere. They've effectively poisoned a majority of the population and have telegraphed that armies and immigrants – and maybe fake aliens – are going to upend the system under their blueprint, such that RFK is lovely tease of establishment hope who will soon be irrelevant.

4
DrMarmot 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think he's sincere, but he still plays a crucial role to TPTB in splitting and defining demographics. They'd never let him be president; he'd have to do it with the military and an occupation of DC.

I personally think he's honest and wicked smart – but he's smart within the areas of his experience and expertise (government and corporate bullshit, the law & environment...), and is openly genuflecting to Israel, as any presidential candidate must. If he's legitimately attacking the system within the confines of the system (e.g. "democracy" and "elections"), he's being used or he's a willing tool.

I truly like the guy though (and his dad & uncle), and he has been a brave spokesman for issues that others have avoided, especially vaccines. As a lawyer and publisher, he has backed his values and views with action, and that's rare. It's also interesting to me that he didn't have much of a public presence until he decided to speak out against Thimerosal. He's the only lawyer to sue and win against Monsanto, and he waited until this point in his life to enter the political sphere. If he were banking on his family name and some sort of will to power, he could have done it a lot sooner.

To add: The fact that he just spoke out against the the banks' defunding Joseph Mercola is pretty amazing.

0
DrMarmot 0 points ago +1 / -1

I'm sure this graphic might represent some sort of truth, but it makes no sense at all. Whites do not make up negative 1.21 units of billionaires, for example.

1
DrMarmot 1 point ago +1 / -0

He's right about a lot of things, but what a dick.

1
DrMarmot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Anyone try to post that link on r/conspiracy? It doesn't come up in a search. I'd be interested to see the responses and if it would survive or be buried.

I'm on an auto-downvote / [delete] status there (as I suspect most of us are), so I'd rather not even try.

1
DrMarmot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Blaming it on diet and lifestyle alone is dishonest when we've been overwhelmingly poisoned through many other vectors – air, water, soil, food, Western medicine, media, EMFs/WiFi, education, propaganda, fucking lies.... etc.

by DrLeaks
2
DrMarmot 2 points ago +2 / -0

Viruses are bullshit. There was great footage of Ebola sufferers dying on the ground in Africa who then get up and are handed a wad of cash from their handlers. Fucking theater.

1
DrMarmot 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think she died circa 2019, and we've been watching her clone or old taped recordings since then. Her mythology is still useful to the kid fuckers.

by pkvi
3
DrMarmot 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's an anti-parasitic. I'm sorry that I have no reliable sources at my findertips, but I'm piecing together that most illnesses are caused by parasites, All those things they say are "good for your immune system": garlic, ginger, tumeric, apple cider vinegar – are all anti-parasitics, as are selenium and zinc.

They invented the virus idea to have an "unseen enemy" and blamed bacteria for other infections to sell drugs and kill our immunity by wiping out gut bacteria with antibiotics. Bacteria colonize infected areas because they're cleaning up the damaged cellular debris caused by the parasites (most of which are microscopic). They're not the ones causing the illness or disease. Most antibiotics wipe out both parasites and bacteria, so they definitely sell themselves by clearing symptoms.

I'm sorry not to source currently, but I'll try a larger more well-defended post in the future.

3
DrMarmot 3 points ago +3 / -0

I've never heard anyone else describe those you love as being the real assets, and that relationships can bleed you dry just like a bad investment. She's not only brilliant, but evolved. Love her.

1
DrMarmot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Then there's Janet Ossebaard's contention that the "Jr." is dropped when Senior dies.

I completely withhold opinion on the matter.

4
DrMarmot 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is my favorite conspiracy theory. Regardless of what's true or bullshit about Q-Anon, that woman looks exactly like an older Caroline.

by pkvi
1
DrMarmot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Worse than that, they're all planning to be re-cloned and live forever after they get rid of the rest of us.

2
DrMarmot 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, that's where I'm at with it. Just amazed that this very intelligent man is now treating it as real, when he referred to COVID as a "computer model" three years ago.

1
DrMarmot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Looks old, Date? Not his current profile pic. This could have been any V-fan posing for a shot. I mean seriously.

1
DrMarmot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Read that whole sentence and the following paragraph.

1
DrMarmot 1 point ago +1 / -0

In 2020, he was one of the early dissenting voices around COVID because he researched its patent – finding that published genomic sequences of the virus were patented as early as 2015. His argument was that one couldn't patent a naturally occurring phenomenon and that the virus only existed as a computer model, ergo had never been "isolated," and therefore couldn't be identified as a disease-causing pathogen.

So, I'm genuinely confused as to why he now has this stance: the virus is a real thing, able to cause disease, transmissible, and made in a lab by evil scientists. Was he co-opted into this narrative or is there something I'm not understanding?

Other researchers have arguably debunked the whole study of "virology" as being a fraud since its inception, and I personally believe that the R&D done by EcoHealth and Wuhan were to perfect the various poisons in the vaccines and possibly those to be introduced in the near future.

Edited for clarity considering comment from u/megalithicallstar.

by DrLeaks
1
DrMarmot 1 point ago +1 / -0

If the antichrist is a single person, I don't think he or she will be from an existing government or monarchy – and especially not one as hated as these "Windsor" pudwhackers. It has to be someone who can charm cross-culturally and internationally, and who looks nothing but trustworthy, intelligent and capable of running a planet.

This, unless of course the global cabal can't pull that off and just rely on mass genocide and brute force, in which case any ol' sadistic wanker can be a figurehead.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›