by pkvi
2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

White-blue-red decorations on the background looks weird for me. :) Kind of trolling, or CNN always use background like that?

My first thought when I saw that image was "What? Trump giving interview to Russia 1 TV channel?". :) :) :)

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

It is even worse.

Basically, "antivirus" is a program that continuously scan everything on your computer, everything that goes in and out for patterns and checksums provided by "antivirus" manufacturer. If something match it is deleted or at least scare alert pops up. So, those who provide lists of patterns, signatures or checksums are in full control of what is accounted as "virus" by that program. Anything could be marked as "virus" just by adding pattern/signature/checksum of unwanted information/software to the list and "antivirus" will happily not only delete that "unallowed" stuff, but prevent you from getting it back.

So, "antivirus" is basically a censorship tool scanning all your data and software and installed deeply into your system and fully controlled by the third party who provide signatures/patterns/checksums list.

To avoid that crap, use systems that have no so called "virus" problem at all. Linux, FreeBSD, Haiku and so on. Avoid marketed Linux distros like RedHat Fedora, Ubuntu and like, use old "marginal" ones. And of course learn how things work.

Also, take in mind that all browsers based on Chromium or Firefox use so called "Google safe browsing" by default to prevent you from visiting any site that is in Google "dangerous content" list. "Google safe browsing" was multiple times caught for marking right and alternative news sites as "dangerous". In Firefox you could disable that censorship tool ( https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Firefox/Privacy paragraph 1.13 ), don't know about Chromium-based browsers.

All browsers that are marketed as "safe" are Chromium-based. All that complete crap like Brave, Vivaldi, Opera, whatever are all Chromium-based. Don't be fooled. Chromium is a huge codebase that developed by Google as HTML/CSS/JS rendering engine. Google browser Chrome is a final product based on Chromium engine. Chromium engine already have huge privacy problems, f.e. there are no way to disable so called "webworkers" or "serviceworkers" - JS scripts that loaded by sites and keep running even when you close page that loaded that script. I'm certain that those who use that shitty "safe" browsers never take a look at chrome://serviceworker-internals/ or brave://serviceworker-internals or whatever and will be amased how many surveillance crap they collected with their "safe" browser. In Firefox you could set dom.serviceWorkers.enabled to false and disable that crap entirely. In Chromium-based browser you can't do that at all. Funny, that "safe" browser "developers" have many requests to allow disabling serviceworkers, but all ignore them and periodically delete/ban/censor that feature requests and bug reports. There was an extension "Block Service Workers" for Chromium based browsers, but it does not work since 2022, because Google removed all possible way to disable them in Chromium codebase.

So, it is not only a question of OS you use, but also you have to pay huge attention to the browser. At least on Linux you could run a browser under firejail and create a completely fake user environment with fake data or just empty one to disinform all that surveillance JS/WASM crap that pushed by every odd webpage to your computer continuously.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ukraine is holding back Russia with decades-old NATO arms which had to be refurbished from storage.

OK, OK, you said that numerous times. Everybody already remembered your narrative. But, if it is all "decades-old NATO arms", then, I assume, there must exist something that could be named modern NATO arms, isn't it? Name something that is new, modern and up to date and cool and wonderful that NATO have on duty and it is not "decades-old NATO arms" like that crap West send to Ukraine or trying to place around Russia.

TR3B? Fuck. If TR3B really exists, it's decades old too.

So name me something, finally. Something tells me, I'll never get anything from you. :) :) :)

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm glad to hear that from you. While curiosity exists among us, nothing is lost yet.

Giving all intellectual faculties to the experts. Yes, its depressing.

I think it is the main problem of modern society. I even can't figure out when that shit started. When that narrative about "you don't need to know how things work to use them" become a powerful mainstream.

by pkvi
3
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

They can't allow people with "inapropriate" views disperse into uncontrolled distributed platforms and hidden forums they have no access to.

I didn't track Musk closely, but AFAIK there was no any official statement from him that he destroyed that government protal of Twitter, banned all government IP networks from access to any means of Twitter content moderation and prohibit any interaction with government bureaucrats for employees. Some months ago Clayton Morris asked Musk directly about removing that portal and disabling any government access to Twirtter, and Musk said "Uhm, oh, you know, we, kind of, continue to work on that." and there was nothing on that matter since then. It is literally a few minutes to completely erase everything that implement this portal from Twitter servers. Just delete some files, nothing more. Of course such statement would have mean nothing since we could not check if he really did that or just hide that shit deeper, but even such statement was not issued. This tells a lot.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

and media confriming

No doubts MSM could just spread any fictional numbers they want and 90% of population would easily believe it without any questions and attempts to find independent confirmations. And whose who will try to show reality will be censored or "debunked" as we already saw during coronahoax. We saw it numerous times in different areas, like health care, climate hoax, crime distribution, financial data, and so on. Radiation levels are no different at all.

I don't remember exact date of some WEF gathering where a method of "creating new reality with MSM and social media" was discussed, but that's what they doing constantly.

They didn't create some "nuclear event" just because it is not necessary for them yet.

And the main cause of their success is an enormous lack of curiosity in modern population. That sheeple even don't want to know how their own car or computer they use every day works, what to tell about having some geiger counters just for curiosity or basic knowledge of chemistry or biology. Sheeple convinced that they don't need and don't want to have that knowledge about world around and that gives elites enormous power over them.

Interesting, how many people on that forum have Geiger counter or dosimeter of any kind at home? Or any other devices that show how the real world is really going around. Just for curiosity and a little safety. Am I the only one who have some? I'm afraid that some here even don't have weather stations or even thermometer outside, depending on stupid app in their smartphones that just shows whar corporation server tell them. And it is very disappointing.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

What happened with paper (or plastic?) money with thin golden threads/particles in them issued in one of US states?

At least that was a kind of decent idea, when people really have gold they own in their hands.

As for that "backed by gold" something, there is a catch - to make it really work, they have to somehow allow every single user to easily check in person that at any give moment amount of gold in government storage is equal to amount in issued notes of any kind.

Otherwise there is no any difference with any other printed money. There always will be too small amount of people who will want to get their physical gold, so they will be able to issue much more notes into circulation than amount of gold they have. Even if those who establish that will be good honest guys, which is already questionable, those who come later could be usual greedy bastards.

That thing with gold backed notes already was the case in the past for nearly any currency in the world and we all know how it ended everywhere. What will prevent the same fate of that Texas new money?

That gold-filled notes I mentioned at the beginning was much more honest and reliable idea of making real sound money.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just hide radioactice shit in lots of places.

That will give only local hotspots, not rising of background everywhere. And it will not be hard at all to locate that radioactive shit.

Nuclear blast or blast of something radioactive will spread radioactive pollution evenly over some large territory and you will get higher radioactivity levels everywhere, not at some spots.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't understand what did you expected from me.

Worldwide known corporations like Sony or Philips do not manufacture Geiger counters, There are can't be advise like "buy Dell XPS series if you need notebook". I don't even know if Geiger counters are allowed for import in your country. There are tons of noname devices at online marketplaces like Amazon, Ebay, Aliexpress, but they have no distinct brand or name. Also there could be local manufacturers in your area I have no idea about. What will be the use if I mention Russian brands like Radex or MKC, if you have no way to buy them? But it does not matter which one you buy, just find out what Geiger tube they use, because Geiger counter sensitivity and quality depends on Geiger tube used, not on who made it and what brand label is attached to it.

It is like asking "what is best WiFi USB dongle model to buy?". It does not matter what brand or model, the chip is matters, not who solder it to PCB and put in case. My answer will be something like "Any with Atheros chipset", not exact model. Moreover, same brand same model dongles could have different chipsets inside. So naming exact brand/model have no any sense.

Fascinating, really, how people choosing what to buy depending on brand name, and not on real properties and whats inside.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Did you miss a link? https://www.gstube.com/catalog/9/ Or https://sites.google.com/site/diygeigercounter/technical/gm-tubes-supported

Basically, SBM-20, J305, J304 and M4011 are affordable tubes most Geiger counters available for regular person are build on.

Find any Geiger counter based on that tubes and that's it.

Note: Those things that plug into smartphone 3.5mm jack have very low sensitivity, they based on p-i-n diode and scintillator which is too small to have a decent sensitivity. They works somehow, but resolution is too low, in the best case they will show you something when radiation level change significantly, but they barely could detect thoriated tungsten welding electrode.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lots of speculation about Geiger counters. Can you link to anyone that actually checked?

F.e. aforementioned SBM-20. Worldwide perfectly known well-tested and long lasting Geiger tube. Anything based on that tube will work fine.

You could easily check your Geiger counter with any radioactive sample, from smoke detectors to thoriated welding tungsten sticks. Geiger tube based counter is a simple device, it is either works, either not. There can't be a situation if it registers background radiation level, but does not detect radioactive substances. Geiger counters easlily could be checked against background radiation level. If it gives you pulses you could just count them and using sensitivity value of used Geiger tube (f.e. from here https://www.gstube.com/catalog/9/) validate your counter. If it gives any pulses for flying through gamma-photons for background radiation, it means it works and it will shurely give you more pulses if there will be more radiation around.

You just can't miss the fact that radiation level become higher than usual background level after certain event. It doesn't have to be deadly or even harmful at all, just if you always had 15uR/h (0.15uSv/h) and suddenly it become 25(0.25) this will inevitably attract attention, and today you will hear a constant scream in social media.

5
CrazyRussian 5 points ago +5 / -0

As you have to know, after Chernobyl, many in Belorus, Ukraine and Western Russia have Geiger counters. They was massively produced after disaster and are not rare things here. Even now ebay/amazon filled with Russian SBM-20 Geiger tubes and devices build around them.

So, if nuke blast was the thing in Pavlograd, then both pro-Ukrainian and pro-Russian communities of that town would have been flooded respective telegram channels with videos of their Geiger counters showing leveled up radiation in the town, blaming either Russians who drop a nuke either Ukrainians who hide a nuke in storage respectively. There are nuclear weapons with low radiation fallout, but it still present and perfectly detectable.

So, despite the theory is interesting, there are no any chance that this could pass without huge flood of messages about radiation levels over social media. There are too many radiation counters and dosimeters on hands here, they are not some rare lab or military equipment, they are home appliances to check the berries and vegetables bought from farmers.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Russian authorities do not want to declare a war because after that Central Bank immidiately should fall under complete government control according to the laws. But this is a taboo for NWO shills.

I think other countries have similar laws too, that is why no country really declared a war since WWII.

Also there are a lot of other consequences of declaring a war, and many goes against NWO narratives.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

So they did a false flag to make themselves look incompetent?

To look for whom? Why anybody here should give any fuck how they look like in eyes of western perverts?

Nobody give a single fuck about what Western elites of MSM think about us here. No single fuck. We are orcs, remember? Orcs don't care what elves think about them. Deal with it.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Which can be activated very rapidly, being semiconductor based, and within a fraction of cycle time.

Of course it can. But should not. Imagine, mains power disappear at the bottom of AC sine. You had -110 V on the hot wire at that moment. Then, you start DC-AC converter that starts from top of AC sine at +110 V on the hot wire.

Guess, would be your devices glad if they suddenly get a surge from -110V to +110V "within a fraction of cycle time.". What if you have some inductive or capacitive load on the UPS output?

That is why there is a delay in switching from mains to battery or vice versa in cheap UPS.

Just take oscilloscope and check how that works if you are in doubt.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why do you think it is not a Russian false flag? Or you think Russian authorities are too honest for false flags? :) How is that if they are awfully evil? Do you understand that propaganda have to be at least logical to work. If you produce self-contradicting garbage, you get garbage instead of propaganda. Garbage in, garbage out.

Do you remember all that fallen drones in the forests close to Moscow? How do you think every single times they was found so fast? :) Did you ever try to find something in the endless forest if you don't know where it is? It is impossible. You need weeks if not months to find something so small. Unless you track or control that drones and know exactly where they fall.

I think Russian military multiple times hold fingers crossed for all that shitty Ukrainian drones looking at their attempts to reach Moscow in the hope they finally do that. But Ukrainians was too greedy for fuel. And finally, either Russian military launch their own, either Ukrainian drone finally did what Putin want.

Meanwhile Zelensky suddenly prolonged his stay in Finland. Wonder why?. :)

Also, nearly all Ukrainian officials screaming in panic that "IT IS NOT US!!!!111". Why is that?

Guess who benefit most from that spectacle?

Are you really that dumb, or you just do your job for 30 shekels?

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Inductor for current is like capacitor for voltage. It will continue to push current when it drops and resist current when it rises. In no way it can restore missing half wave.

In line conditioners that usually sold everywhere, if you ever disassembled one, you will see a relatively small inductors on each wire or a common mode choke with capacitors before and after. Somethimes semiconductor surge protectors (varistors) added. This circuit is mostly for supressing noise in power line and cutting noise that could come from devices you connect to it, and if it have supressors nothing more. In no way inductors and capacitors used could store enough power to restore somehow missed half wave. It is just a HF filter, usually designed to cut frequencies higher than 2kHz, nothing more.

Just tear down one and see that by your own eyes. You could even easily measure frequency characteristcs if you have a tunable frequency generator and multimeter.

Line stabilisers, are another beasts that switch windings when grid voltage drops or rises, to keep output in limits, they can't restore missing half wave too.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

A half wave gap in input power results in an exponential decay in output during that period as the magnetic field collapses.

It already collapsed because input voltage is zero. There is nowere to get power to create full halfwave that is missed.

Not all UPSs use relays, some designs use power switching semiconductors with a far faster switching time and they can respond a lot faster than either a mechanical contact or 1/60 of a second half cycle time which is 8 milliseconds

Most "smart" UPS have dealy while switching from mains to battery and back not because of speed of switching device, but because of unsyncronized mains and internal DC-AC converter. Imagine mains power disappear at the top of sine wave, while DC-AC converter is at the bottom. You will have a problem with twice of grid voltage rapid swing with all consequences. So, UPS have to wait while its DC-AC converter output will reach zero to safely switch to it. Usually things are even simplier - if mains disappear, UPS just switch to DC-AC convertor and start it. This takes time. Also many use the same transformer for mains voltage stabilisation and charging and for DC-AC converter that also limits speed of switching.

UPS manufacturers cheat with speed of reaction to power grid changes, showing time of reaction for grid voltage stabilisation mode, which is done by switching between additional transformer winding parts that does not need any delay or sync, and not for switching from grid to battery and back.

I saw "smart" UPS that constantly run separate DC-AC converter in sync with grid, to make the switching process fast and safe, but they are not a cheap ones you usually see on the market and cost a little less than normal online UPS that just have no any switching process at all.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

So called "smart" UPS produce glitches too. When grid power is OK, they connect it to the output directly. On the power loss they switch to battery powered DC-AC converter or switch additional windings on power transformer. For price saving reasons they do it with relays. All that processes create noticeable glitches in output. Moreover, to avoid need for syncronisation of grid frequency with DC-AC converter ones, "smart" UPSes usually skip at least half of AC period while switching from mains to battery and back.

I don't even mention all that "line conditioners" They perfectly pass half wave gaps that gives noticeable glitch on the output of loaded power supply. They are fine only for cutting high frequency noise from power grid.

So, only online UPS are useful for real protection against glitches, since they always create output from scratch (48-96V DC) using their DC-DC and DC-AC converters, so nothing from input could crawl to the outpur and switching from mains to battery and back is seamless.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Really, only UPS that have value are online ones. They take AC and convert it to DC at around 48-96V. Batteries (usually 12V ones connected in chain to get that 48-96V) give out same voltage. Batteries and output of AC-DC converter connected together through diodes. Regardless of what source is giving power, that 48-96V DC then converted to 155 or 315V DC depending on grid voltage, 110V AC or 220V AC. This 155/315V DC then converted to 110/220V AC sine. There are no direct connection between input and output and switching to battery and back occur absolutely seamless. When mains disappear, current continue to flow from batteries like nothing happened. When power is back, you get current from AC-DC converter again. Last stage in that scheme, DC-AC converter, is really not necessary for most tech usually connected via UPS.

You could find parts of online UPS as separate modules, also today you could find modules for building solar power systems based on online UPS principle, when in addition to mains AC-DC converter and battery, to the same 48-96V DC rails also connected solar panels that will be used when they give enough voltage in absense of grid power. Or they will charge batteries if grid is OK. So you could build DIY cheap online UPS using this modules, car batteries and whatever additional source of electricity you have and get a power source that will seamlessly move from one source to another and back by design. If you need it only for modern devices with switching power supply, you don't need to buy final DC-AC converter, which is usually not something cheap, due to expensive high-voltage high-power transistors, you could power your tech from 155/315V DC without any issues.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

You don't need sine wave line controller to power your equipment with AMD processors. All power supplies are switching ones now, so you could power them from DC current of apropriate voltage. Power supplies will be perfectyl happy with that and you could save a decent amount of money getting rid of sine wave driver that makes AC from DC which is completely unnecesary for switching power supplies.

Interesting, that today very few applications really need AC power. It is mostly motors, things that still use transformer power supplies and things with triac power regulator. All other things will run on DC without any problem.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

I am not really convinced this is something that has happened, I mean, I don't know shit

"I don't know" is perfectly fine answer for any normal human. Unlike those experts in everything who flooded every single information flow.

We just don't know. Existing evidences, or what is posed as evidences just are not convincing enogh to make any solid conclusion. It is absolutely normal thing, when something is not clear. And it is a huge red flag for me when somebody have answers to anything.

consider all the engines purchased since the collapse of the nasa systems.

I think it was more financial decision than technical. Why order development of overpriced engines on the West when you can buy cheap Russian ones and put the difference in the pocket?

Surely this led to the musk rockets, from what I understand it is the russian engine tech with mods.

Initially, Musk tried to buy whole Russian rockets, even before Space X. He was in Russia twice and look for empty ballistic missiles for a decent price, however, he didn't take in account that rocket itself is not the most expensive thing in the whole rocket launch system. Russian engines are used in Atlas V rockets and many other Western projects. Interesting that few years before 2020s shitty mess, US rocket manufacturers fill their stocks with RD-180s, like they know what's coming beforehand. However, Musk finally accepted that he had to spend a lot if he want to enter space industry and decided to develop his own engines. It is a sane decision, it is always better to own crucial tech than to buy it from somwhere. I don't know if he designed his own engines or copied Russian ones for Falcons, but it does not really matter. His decision was correct.

I think we are in a religious war

Kind of. It is a war between different elites who believe religiously in their own vision of NWO and simultaneously against anything that does not fit their common NWO narratives.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

You and I both know the 'alien technology' is simply leftist speak for rocket technology

I'm not shure about that. If aliens ever visited Earth there should be something. Fact that all known tech is perfectly tracked to humans origins does not prove that alien technology does not exist.

stolen from Russians.

That's not true. Yes, Tsiolkovsky put a basement for modern rocket tech in Russia, but that was only theory, practice began decades later. West had their own rocket tech and traditions, mostly from Third Reich, that developed rocketry in parallel with USSR. USSR and Germany even cooperate in 1930s in that field. After WWII rocket tech divided into two separate branches. Every single rocket today is a successor to Third Reich or USSR tech or a combination of both, f.e. Russian engine with Western body.

The west and nato have not developed anything usable in the past 20 years that I know of.

That's the point. Is it not clear if it is intentional destruction or a side effect of education degradation.

You are too good to speak to this eisenhorn jew criminal

They tell interesting things from time to time. Occasionally. Tracking narratives they believe is sometimes useful for connecting the dots.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sure. Open a thread about it. What makes you think that I would defend any of this?

I'm trying to sligtly damage your selectivity. If you think that some things countries do looks questionable for you, then Russia is not even in the top 10 for you to care about.

Russia can try to touch it and see what happens.

Already. You could clearly see what happening. And NATO could do absolutely nothing to stop it. Moreover, it only makes things much worse.

Mothballed arms that got pulled out of storage

So, glorious NATO can't afford to supply its new "ally" against worst enemy with modern weapons? What does it tell you about NATO? Are you shure that wonderweapons are real? TR3B anybody?

are wreaking Russia's best stuff.

None of best stuff was ever wreaked. And nearly all significant damage to the Russian Forces was done only by old Soviet weapons according to statistics. From old Soviet drones to old Soviet S300.

So, NATO weapons are literally useless on the battlefield. Fuck, Even that M16 rifles are thrown by Ukrainians in favour to Soviet AK. Who needs assault rifle that needs "return to manufacturer for maintenance" after usual dirt bath and permanent cleaning and servising to just work?

What do you think will happen if NATO would go all out against Russia with its modern equipment?

What modern equipment? White House is protected by Norwegian NASAMS that is proved useless in Ukraine. Or you want to tell that White House is protected by outdated crap? Then what crap is not outdated, and what targets that are more important than White House that protected by something much better than NASAMS? Name me something.

TR3B, anyone?

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

You can't even imagine how ridiculously your question sounds. :)

I'll try any case. When Germany finally defeat Bavaria? When US finally defeat Montana? When France finally defeat Normandy? Your question is exactly the same.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›