https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cqvNmSz9W04
Watch the Water
You don't accomplish the goals you state by revealing the trick, creating a backlash that has removed and/or imprisoned many officials so far, with thousands of proven indictments, giving proofs and setting an event clock that works. You quite obviously don't appreciate the sheer genius it took (See Cicada 3301) and faculties utilized (See Looking Glass) to create the scope of the plan. It isn't a checker game for people who can't decode a commode.
Biden's team had complete control until Q hit. The Goose was Cooked.
So......why do the big reveal and blow the trick? Huh? Why form Q and inform the public as to the trick, when it was in the bag? I'll wait for that one.
Look at you here now......wha's up widdat, since it's a forum formed to discuss the thing you deny. You here to attempt to sway weak minds, and I'm here to check your childish attempt to sit at the big boy's table.
Flat earth. Holy shit for brains. You go for the low hanging fruit, huh.
Trump can't 'pardon' a man charged and held in another country before a trial has occurred.
How could you possibly know how Trump 'felt' about the situation. You say he didn't feel bad about something he couldn't do. Besides, it wouldn't fit the plan in the timeline you'd suggest.
A real trial wouldn't serve the DS, as they've shown by striking a deal that supposedly includes the destruction of wiki files. (lol - 'We have everything'). Don't assume pure white/black distinctions in any of the characters involves. Optics create strange Situations, as the head of the opposing cabal snake, Situationists International, know full well. Trump is the face of the plan, due to this optic. Future Proves Past
Learn which companies and batches were bad, and which were not.
You learned to discern this from anon sites.
Info was given.
Then, Free choice was given, no directive.
This was necessary due to the insane optic at the time as you surely recall.
Trump used to operate as the fixer for conmen. So he knows the game.
This isn't Nirvana or the Second Coming, it's the throwing down of snakes, so it takes one to know one. Right, fren? (wink wink)
You have a critique, question or comment adding information?
I don't like wasting time on cheap ad hominem attacks.
So what part confused you, maybe I can help.Try searching the group's name with Assange. aka 'Do the work.' and then David Ferrie and World Vision and Manson and World Vision via The Family which is the Hollyweird Cult of trafficking. Scientology as taught to Manson by mobsters in prison.
They. Are on drugs. Do the work and get back asap. You're welcome.
A deal saves discovery in trial and future discussion about change in classified information vs whistleblowers as criminals.
What's with the white hair and blue-eyes obsession in modern cults?
Things.
So......when Julian Assange first appeared into The Optic....I already knew about this.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Family_(Australian_New_Age_group)
What about it, you ask? Do the work.
Oh, and while you're at it, ask how Charles Manson was connected to The Family along with David Ferrie and World Vision church.
So I asked myself......was he an example of someone who'd turned on The Family and its global ratlines? Or is he deep cover? River or Joaquin as Phoenix?
The parallel plotlines are confusing to say the least. Future proves past every....single....time.
kek
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7534595/
How many medicines can be defined as 'poisons' when abused or misused?
Like the mind.
Don't try harder. Try better.
Your dissection was fairly astute, in that it recognized that sacrifice is a materialist ritual in place of esoteric understanding.
Since you've decided that's your special power :) take YHWH apart, learning how the word is formed letter-by-letter.
Words divide by de-fin-ition. Unfortunately we use them to commune.
So I'll never downdoot you, because you serve a purpose here that others won't provide.You do give the answers that the literal interpretation suggests.
That said (oh oh):
In the beginning was The Word aka Logos (all contained in all words aka Google) plus one.
Through lower division we get wordS.
Involution/Evolution. Always return to the source: That is, put them back together as one. Then we may learn what something is, as opposed to what it is not, based off it's opposite. I'm not an ant-semantite, I just know it's limitations.
When the 'law' and the 'will' become one thing, this 'will' becomes extraneous. Until then it leads to error.
Your analytical bent would help, should you venture a little higher and look at what is behind Gematria and in fact, words, letters and number..........as ratios of ONE.
Word
Human sacrifice was a norm before it switched to animals. The story of Abraham sacrificing Isaac was all about it. Then it was animals and doves in the church. Now it's a monetary tithe in its place in the orthodox. Still 'sacrifice' of material things not self.
We still have a long way to go.
I remember when it was harder to tell when somebody was a glow fag.
Remember to do actual research like this:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7534595/
You, know...real research. This is the news meme today.
You're choosing to loose, on the wrong team, in the wrong forum.
You're the one who's going to have to spend the rest of your life regretting it.
Same thing happens when my wife goes into the changing booth at Walmart.