There were 'two thieves' on either side of the 'cross/crucifix' of 'christ'.
I attempt to bring Manna to both. Here's a sop:
A circumstance brought me to a discussion about Cognition with a top Cognitive Behavior Psychologist and by relation, with his 'team' of metaphysicists. They had a new theory called String Theory. I asked him to explain. When he'd finished, to make a long story short, I had shown lacking in the theory and offered something to allow it to work. I introduced the concept of spirit into the equation, inserted between 'that which is seen, and that which sees it' the word 'Magic'. Why magic?
An invisible middle between all forces exist and that spirit is invisible yet constantly proven/inferred by the two. (thieves).
Micro to macro, one finds the two thieves as science and religion. They are enemies currently and always until the spirit is known, not guessed at or given a number of measurement or a 'name'.
This idea was excitedly accepted and introduced as their own of course. I let them do that, because I knew its fault and wanted no credit had they offered. lol
I was personally thanked, but you know what? They are currently trying now to remove the M (magic/spirit) from the equation, because they and science can't actually define it as a thing, and they don't believe in spirit.
What is known to the gnostic is magic to the agnostic 'believer'.
I fight thieves on both sides of the invisible middle (silence) from which is born the Logos/light, who's 'mantle' is to be worn, Until then, one could only hope to touch the hem of the garment. Let he who has ears hear.
There were 'two thieves' on either side of the 'cross/crucifix' of 'christ'.
I attempt to bring Manna to both. Here's a sop:
A circumstance brought me to a discussion about Cognition with a top Cognitive Behavior Psychologist and by relation, with his 'team' of metaphysicists. They had a new theory called String Theory. I asked him to explain. When he'd finished, to make a long story short, I had shown lacking in the theory and offered something to allow it to work. I introduced the concept of spirit into the equation, inserted between 'that which is seen, and that which sees it' the word 'Magic'. Why magic? An invisible middle between all forces exist and that spirit is invisible yet constantly proven/inferred by the two. (thieves).
Micro to macro, one finds the two thieves as science and religion. They are enemies currently and always until the spirit is known, not guessed at or given a number of measurement or a 'name'.
This idea was excitedly accepted and introduced as their own of course. I let them do that, because I knew its fault and wanted no credit had they offered. lol
I was personally thanked, but you know what? They are currently trying now to remove the M (magic/spirit) from the equation, because they and science can't actually define it as a thing, and they don't believe in spirit.
What is known to the gnostic is magic to the agnostic 'believer'.
I fight thieves on both sides of the invisible middle (silence) from which is born the Logos/light, who's 'mantle' is to be worn, Until then, one could only hope to touch the hem of the garment. Let he who has ears hear.
How's the book coming? Read one page.