Most of you know the operation that a user, by the name of SwampRangers, runs by using many other alt accounts. But in short, they overtake groups to control the narrative, and since his pawn became a mod in here - this place is 100% lost. I would advise you to seek other forums, or create them yourself.
More info on SwampRangers' organization - Part 1: https://conspiracies.win/p/1ARd3k2vVT/wow-seems-like-swamprangers-is-a/c/ /// Part 2: https://conspiracies.win/p/1ARd3k3C1T/part-2-swamprangers-is-a-group-o/c/
And of course, the "fairness" that you can expect from the new moderator: https://conspiracies.win/p/1ARd3l9OYI/notice-who-are-the-users-who-def/c/ /// Context here: https://conspiracies.win/p/1ARd3k3C1T/x/c/4eXvGpTaHTU
I joined this forum because Axelotl_Peyotl proved his worth in r/conspiracy and r/conspiracy_commons as a mod, who was removed for speaking the truth, and he recommended this forum. It was a great forum while he was here, but after he left, it slowly deteriorated into a disorganized echo chamber (but still with free speech), and now we can see it dead because a shill is appointed to be a mod...
Axelotl_peyotl was hated immediately for speaking the truth - https://np.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/ksk55w/meta_top_rconspiracy_mod_axolotl_peyotl_ive_been/
Although he was never hateful, even in his last message - https://np.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/ksk55w/meta_top_rconspiracy_mod_axolotl_peyotl_ive_been/
And even a documentary was made for him - https://odysee.com/@foundring:1/axolotl:9
The many badges of honor of a real warrior for the truth! This is a reminder that real sparks of light in humanity are still treated as enemies and removed, while the evil ones win a short victory over them. The legacy that Axelotl_Peyotl created can never be matched in here, but some of you are still warriors for the truth, and I hope you win many battles... although you will be ultimately hated by the majority.
This forum will never be as strong as when Axelotl_Peyotl was here, and now it's in the hands of the shills. But I know some of you are warriors for the truth, and no matter how many places eject us, we will never quit speaking out the truth!
The shills have won this forum, but have they won the real war?
What other free speech forum there? Saidit is shutdown right? Does rumble have a forum?
The Saidit folks went to GoatMatrix. It's not really ideal as there's an arbitrary yet strictly enforced rule against violence, and (temporary) shadow banning is applied on users without even notifying them. However, the same character of Saidit is maintained there with quality content being posted. My preference is that a new forum be created but for the time being that website should do.
https://media.tenor.com/aPCAEcqFlwUAAAAC/robert-de.gif
Is there anything wrong with what I said?
Be the the change you wish to see.. To change this forum would be an attempt at subversion, which would be banned by rule 3.
Lol, you appear to be talking to a sockpuppet - he hasn’t posted for a year before this last comment of his
Yes, I know. Thanks tho in case I didn't. This was their warning.
Assembling with another within a forum curtails ones free will of choice to shape speech. Whatever one shapes within a forum will be judged by consensus, which binds free will of choice.
Any available forums have people, who might hear your words - from the smallest to the biggest.
The focus is that you don't give up speaking about it.
Unfortunately, here you have 50% people, who already know the major conspiracies, and 50% shills, who will attack you immediately... Now the mod is a known shill, who only cares for himself, not the users in the forum...
You keep saying it's dead but you keep coming back. Do you have an alternative?
the internet has been compromised a long time ago. https://conspiracies.win/p/17t1omxsqX/the-internet-is-compromised--tra/c/
There are places that still appreciate free speech. Now, during the Epstein files release, it's more than ever, if I can say that. Even 9gag is flooded with posts that want to convict anyone connected to Epstein.
The point of the post is that warriors of truth never quit, no matter the hardship we experience. Jesus didn't, how can we?
Lmao, I looked at my partner the other day and said with a straight face looking them dead in the eye.
I knew about this shit 10+ years ago, alot of people here did. Nothing is coming out that is shocking me, I wouldnt even be surprised to find out the baby sacrifices are real because that shit has been done for thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of years.
Everyone here also says the aliens are a distraction from the epstein files, what if the epstein files are a distraction from the aliens, I am dead serious. If our creators are revealing themselves, its only because the end of this interglacial is at hand.
Resetting the experiment.
"Our creators"... :D
You should base your theories on facts, not base your facts on theories...
There's a strange phenomenon where the retardation hubs that 4chan used to look down on have somehow increased in quality over the years, with political incorrectness being the norm. Another example is FunnyJunk. But I'm not sure how representative that is for a wider change. Reddit is closed down as hell now and people flock to Discord where power-drunk mods ban users arbitrarily. You're probably right, though. The floodgates have opened. Pizzagate is being reassessed by the wider public.
9gag is full of cucks...lol its good for funny memes. That's it.
Just like every other place nowadays, but now they spam about Jeffrey Epstein and there are way more people, so it's worth exposing the pedo elite, where people can see it.
What's the worth in exposing something in here, where half of the people already know it, and the other half are shills?
That's it just Epstein who my 80 year old mum knows is a 'bad man"
Try talking about any other theories like tartaria or the fake moon landings and you'll be met with npc glory!
Axo, abandoned this forum rather quickly from the get go, whatever. The government prolly threw his ass in prison for "election manipulation" assuming he wasnt actually government himself.
Why I am still here, im not sure. No one here talks about aliens, its mostly about god. If disclosure comes ill prolly just give it up for good.
Im also hopefully close to the end of my journey, I lived my life the way I want to, not how others thought I should. With the nephro referral, I just need to wait another year or two and then a kidney biopsy can tell me if its parathyroid, multiple myleoma, or lead damage. The way I feel I assume its fucking MM or something.
As for the mod, its hard for me to separate thoughts from noise. But its is kinda weird the comments they are choosing to go back and delete, like what do they care someone said something mean from a year+ ago.
Makes me wonder, again, how they became mod in the first place. I still havent seen much transparency about this, maybe I should actually go back and read through shit, its been a couple years but I really am to tired to care.
Is it possible they are alts of the owners of this site. Pulling a spetz on everyone. Making alts and pretending to be different people to build some fake interest in the site? I mean thats likely the most logical sense, pruning posts to make the site a little more mainstream friendly. These same people are mods/admins of the other majors subs featured on this site like health or food.
I wont lie though something about the way they operate reminds me of that guy "who erases your digital sins". Aka "Search Engine Optimization (SEO) manipulation"
I really thought about making a new account on reddit, since I wasnt banned. But there is no way in hell that website is not geo fenced. Ill be reading some random news article and the comments and realize im reading someones comments of a username that ive seen before in the local subreddit. It happens enough I dont think its coincidence.
You can always find a place to share your story and view of things. Even on reddit, you can create your own subreddit.
The evil ones control the big ones, that doesn't mean your voice is worthless... You might help someone with your thoughts, you never know...
Speak louder, don't give up. And it's better to do it in other places too, you don't know where someone will hear you and truly understand.
Hang in there! Keep the faith!
https://scored.co/c/Conspiracies/p/1ARK0RBc7L/x/c/4eaTFjTz9dR
There was a queue a year long, I don't think she finished it yet. That should explain the deletions sufficiently. She doesn't prune everything that was reported. Logs are public and I stand by to answer specific questions about what's public.
You must be needing to get to sleep soon. What time is it where you're at?
Back log queue has been cleared but I didn't update the last audit thread. A fair amount of new users that were filtered were approved.
Edit: adding u/freedomlogic
What nation do you live in? You're not from America are you?
Literal trolling for info, this is the last warning and then this alt will be banned like your main. Stop.
Swamp said he's from America. Not like anyone could track you down from saying that. The times of the day you're most active, looks like you're from Eastern Europe or Tel Aviv.
Let's call it insomnia. You are fishing/trawling/trolling and my warning stands.
Oh my! You might ban me....again? Like, you mean like the last time, and the time before that, and the time before that, and the time before that? We must be going on a bakers dozen now. Bans on this site are like the points on Who's Line Is It Anyway....they're tallied but they don't matter.
https://communities.win/c/TrueConspiracies/p/1ASFm4cTGD/swamp-searches-for-unmodded-comm/c
This is what happened in a nutshell
Since u/RealWildRanter has permabanned me from c/TrueConspiracies (you be the judge), I answer your question here. Thank you for (apparently) using my links to construct your own narrative and post it in a different forum.
You say I "saw an opportunity to gain power". What I saw was an opportunity to share a problem (lack of mod) and contribute as an equal voice to a solution. I didn't theorize about myself as mod until after Neo theorized about himself as mod. I also affirmed everyone whose name was put forward in the discussion, and withdrew my name when it was first objected to.
You take my giving the contrasting history of c/ChristianAnarchism as evidence of "pattern of ... targeting forums without mods". Well, when I see one, I call people's attention to it, in the same way that others do. You can check Meta archives for the many posts about what should be done with an unmodded (or poorly modded) community. But my illustration shows that I'm okay at reading community consensus; that one had a clear consensus, this one didn't, and I said so both times. Reading the community can be done with objectivity. When I decided to take on a large number of community names, I purposed that all communities would be self-determining, where a consensus contrary to my view would be honored. You can see this pattern in my welcome posts and anytime there is critical mass to have a community question. So my actual established pattern is to advocate neutrally for resolution for communities when an admin solution is needed. The word "targeting" is not usually used for a practice of merely asking questions about community goals.
Neo accused me at the time, after giving me unqualified support in the above link. You follow Neo's characterizations uncritically. See if Neo's complaints align at all with his earlier endorsement of me, from that link:
It doesn't sound too off to say u/Thisisnotanexit "wanted the community, not admins, to vote on a mod, but gladly accepted to forgo a community decision and accept mod appointment". Nor is it an issue, given how community decisions were attempted. The fact is (I assumed you were watching at the time and not absent as you count yourself a regular), I first asked the binary of should we have a mod team and got that 4-1 result that was not strong, then I asked the binary of whether we should have a single mod as opposed to a plurality and got such little response that there was no real conclusion. That was after TINAE had admin support, and I didn't want to make a binary question about her so posted a simpler question. The fact that the community couldn't even agree on how to proceed led me to abandon any other questions about moderation and I let things take their course. As TINAE discussed rules in the hopes of being appointed mod, there was some approval of her discussion and a little trolling from those now deported, but there was never a point at which the community either found a consensus to favor admin selecting a mod (it could only come from admin) or found a consensus to do anything else. So eventually admin acted. I've said, anyone could post a new vote today, even a recall vote; but presumably a recall would involve an alternate solution, and nobody's proposed one.
You refer to an accountable church with a standard confession of faith as a cult. I'd appreciate knowing your standard of judgment. I suppose the Nicene Creed, the Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy, and the Apologetics Group Essentials aren't enough to prove to you that one is not in a cult (https://www.scottlively.net/first-century-bible-college)?
So, it's not as simple as Neo makes out, and I answered him in place when he complained. He asked for a roundtable subject once a mod had left, and I (considerately) proposed a roundtable subject and spoke about the mod leaving. He proposed that he could do mod work and I proposed that he could or I could. He endorsed me (as above) and so I went to Meta, continuing to promote him as well and all other names that entered. He turned on me, and I withdrew my name. If someone knows something I, or the forum, could've done better, I listen.
Getting ready for lunch soon?
I could say you must be. You've certainly been up a long time giving me lots of earned media in a forum I'm banned from. I like to post all those to c/SwampRangers, but I'll wait until you get tired of making up new ones.
I post at all hours, and sometimes enjoy late nights with a relatively stable questioner. Click my name to see the state forums I moderate, one of the time zones indicated by those is correct. You can also run my ordinary posting times through a number-cruncher, other people do that.
Welcome handshake. Do you have a better idea for c/Conspiracies? Did you want to come out in favor of anarchy (nobody else did) or did you want to propose a different consensus moderation solution? The community resists declaring consensus, which is natural.
This user has been banned and the comment you replied to has been removed.
Few suggest groups to tempt each of many to TAKE a place within it, which in return positions few OVER many.
Seeking implies towards outcome; seeing implies in response to origin...seeking diminishes seeing.
Forum implies a gathering together of many under few...few suggest creation-ism to tempt each creation-ist among many to consent to a gathering of consensus called a "forum".
Withing nature...one cannot create; only transform. Many can be tricked with creationism into ignoring transformation; which in return permits few to create fiction within a transforming reality.
...I ignore that cause separates being from one another. Few suggest the word "because" as an inversion of "causing to be" aka sound causing instrument to be.
Speech implies the articulation of natural sound, hence speaking tempting one another into a truth vs false conflict.
Nature implies deterioration (inception towards death) of being (life)...how fast or slow depends on resistance to temptation.
Free implies from one another...it's the want to assemble (forum) with one another which establishes an echo chamber of artificial repetition by reflection.
A badge implies a "token; device worn by servants or followers to indicate their allegiance". Few suggest badges of honor to make it easier for many to hide disgrace; like the disgrace to join in uniformity hidden underneath badges of justice.
Will (life) implies from initiation (inception) towards ultimate (death) aka a choice in-between balance...love vs hate implies imbalance.
Strength resides within being...assembling beings within a forum makes those assembled weak, and those assembling strong.
To join a forum willingly implies ones consent to being moderated by a chosen one, which in return weakens the strength of ones choice.
RE (to respond) AL (all) aren't at war with one another...RE implies each piece/peace within AL.
War implies response vs response aka mutual destruction while ignoring all (everything) for absolutely nothing.... https://genius.com/Edwin-starr-war-lyrics
bot
We like him more than you
I understand what you're saying. From what I can determine SwampRangers is a Christian-Zionist. Which is bad, when you consider what the Zionists have done to this world. The immense pain and suffering they have caused.
BTW, did you know Ghislaine Maxwell was secretly operating one of the most powerful Reddit accounts of all time? She was known as the mysterious and anonymous redditor Maxwellhill.
I know that.
I would never say SwampRangers group was ever Christian tho. Literally posted proofs that he's the mod of satanism and satan groups.
The point was that a good group is now in the hands of a known shill that nobody real voted for...
OK. So what. The US Government is in the hands of Satan. X (Twitter) is owned and controlled by Elon Musk, Meta by Mark Zuckerberg, TikTok by Larry Ellison. Do you think these people are saints? No, they're all jews and zionists. Deal with it.
We can't change that, but we can netutralize them. Most people don't believe anything posted on social media platforms. That's what we need to focus on. Make them irrelevant. So goes true for shills.
And what's your plan on making them irrelevant?
I still share my thoughts on forums wherever I can. A lot of places are controlled, but as long as you can voice your opinion, and reach someone - it's worth it. This small forum, where gifted conspiracy researchers lost the battle to shills, is not worth it. That's why other places should be found.
I'm glad to see some of the people here being active in new places already! Being a conspiracy researcher, while dealing only with shills, is a cruel way to waste a major talent in today's world.
I didn't write this post for shills, I wrote it to those, who are willing to change the world, because they are warriors of truth. And truth is most valuable in these times of deception. It's what the so called "elites" truly fear.
I don't really have a plan, but now that you mention I'll think about. One thing you can do is let someone, you believe is a shill, let know they hit a brick wall. A good way to do that is use a standard "comeback" that's appropriate within the context. Many templates are available to choose from, here is one.
What's your definition for "reach" in this context? if you are allowed to post, someone will read it. Is that good enough for you?
Again I think it comes down to definitions and expectations. "lost the battle" maybe something hard to quantify. Same goes for shills, not easy to spot. With every one of your posts there is always a chance someone may think you are a shill.
Personally, I would think you lost the battle when you react with anger or worse, hate. It's okay to be frustrated, but frustration goes away in short time.
Also, Neo (who doesn't want me to ping him) neglects to point out that anyone who clicks my name can see I claimed the forum names of satan and satanism (to prevent anyone else from abusing them when the landrush occurred), and anyone who clicks forward once more can see that they only generated one or two posts in four years (people tell me that qualifies as a "dead" forum).
Y'know, I kinda like it, getting charged with running totally dead forums, and also getting charged with running totally live forums, when they're the same forums. It's not only free advertising, it also shows up just how idiotic my accusers are.
I don't care and haven't checked or clicked on anything. As far as I can tell Neo has a bone to pick with you. Pretty common on all social media platforms I've been on.
"The point was that a good group is now in the hands of a known shill that nobody real voted for..."
That's a good point cause I didn't even know there was a vote...all the sudden we have a new mod
I brought up my intent to mod for almost 4 months.. Neo seems to only disrupt everytime they 'check in'.
I'm here to help the community.
A reminder of when we last spoke about this:
https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/1ARK0SKYT2/moderation-questions-megathread/c/4eXtiZPKNeK
I do recall that and was waiting for a meta post on a vote...I figured it would've went the same way as when we voted on allowing FE posts a while back.
I had hoped it would go that way too but the real community user participation was low. Is there anything with new moderation you'd like to see addressed?
I love this platform specifically for its free speech...as long as that isn't hindered its cool.
There was a period where there was certain users making pedo comments which definitely needed a banning. So if thats what u are doing than I salute u.
I love this platform too. I'm on troll patrol o7
Current moderation is to be in line with previous moderation style. It's working out fairly well, I think.
Hi Dregan, I hosted a vote that went 4-1-1 in favor of having a mod team generically, but seeing that there were many more silent people I didn't pursue an up-down vote on any name. After about 10 days, where 6+ names had been submitted here and on Meta, u/Thisisnotanexit indicated that admin was willing to appoint her at a later date if conditions held. This appointment happened about 2 weeks ago. I've proposed that if anyone wants a further vote, anyone is free to host a discussion; the last such discussion had a strong 17-4-1 consensus against TINAE's interpretation of the rules, and she abided by that. But it wouldn't be fitting for me to propose a new vote myself, as my doing so here has raised more questions than votes. Let me know if you want links.
Thanks for the response. I believe it should've went to a vote for all members new and old who wanted to have a say.
Several people created vote threads just as you describe, the most conclusive one was 4-1-1 in favor of some unspecified mod team, with silent lurkers outnumbering those totals a lot. Anyone is free to start a new vote anytime, I'm mystified why they don't.
Welcome. Yes, out of six names proposed over 10 days when the subject came up, admin indeed selected u/Thisisnotanexit as a frontrunner, and then waited another two months to gauge the community's reaction to that preference.
Again, Neo1's original opinion of me was:
The link you point out includes my analysis showing that there were not a significant number of contributors to the vote, which is why I didn't press the issue with the community. I also analyzed a separate recent conversation that went 17-4-1 against TINAE's interpretation of a rule, and she accepted that consensus, so it's not like people are incapable of voting. So I think the admins waiting awhile to gauge consensus as an added method beyond the vote itself was a responsible way of collecting the consensus. I've also said anyone can start a new vote anytime, which hasn't happened for some reason. The fact that Christians take more responsibility for voting on community questions than average isn't significant in that respect.
I wouldn't have a problem with your proposing a conspiracy, but your username indicates inauthenticity, and your immediate reaction to getting deleted aggravates it. You were autodeleted for being a handshake, and TINAE then ratified that by judging you didn't demonstrate commitment to the published rules. Neither I nor TINAE has ever sought to hide how things happened, I have always responded with full facts and she has never denied any of the facts either; in fact she posted the moderation megathread for the purpose of ensuring discussion was connected and findable. But your conclusions are illogical and, I believe, would fail the tests of skepticism that we use here.
If you wanted to proceed with any of (1) logical demonstrations of culticness in traditional Christianity, (2) logical demonstrations that anyone is being deleted here for content rather than for rule violation, (3) logical demonstrations that I, TINAE, or u/Paleo should have done something different at some point, (4) better solutions for the community than what's happened so far, or (5) any new community question, I would affirm such an approach. But it requires being prepared to handle truth in a community of competing views, and you're not demonstrating much of that. So for now I'm going to call you Joe because your illogic style reminds me of someone, someone who often does successfully take the hint when I point it out to him.
Good faith users and their questions will be given almost all my attention til the matter is settled agreeably. I just thought you and anyone reading this should know that.
I am not a Zionist by any ordinary definition of the word (you may well have an extraordinary definition you care to put forward for this duckspeak term). I do, of course, believe that every nation has an equal right to self-determination.
I'm not religious and I don't care if you are. You can be any religion, it's fine with me.
Perhaps a good way to know if one is a Christian-Zionist or not is their response to the question "what type of relationship, if any, do Christian Zionists have with Palestinian Christians?".
All Christians are one with the Palestinian Christians, who are mourning losses like the lives of Nahida and Samar Anton in 2023, an event that contributes to the ICJ genocide case South Africa v. Israel currently in adjudication. Being one with them, I was tracking the LPJ's evangelism in Gaza before that happened so I'm still looking for more to be revealed about IDF activity in that event.
Funny, nobody who uses "Zionist" as a slur cares to define it.
PAPA? Is that you?
Joined 8 days ago, and I find this comment from you, where you confirm that your account was created just to troll me:
https://conspiracies.win/p/1ARwwpmpWw/x/c/4eZDpb5fEoz // https://imgur.com/a/B076SGn
But not after your first comment is congratulating the fake mod - https://conspiracies.win/p/1ARwwtDNry/x/c/4eZDpb5exRD // https://imgur.com/a/ygazNgC
Thanks for the spare small place in your head that I am living rent free. Must be killing you... :D
And already your progeny has contributed more to productive discussion than you ever have.
One time meta post approval for Mod transparency.
You've been banned before for these meta posts, this is your warning.
OP has requested I not ping him so this is my response to him.
I only use c/SwampRangersAlt, and that not for a long time. For a bit for one person I used c/Ranger164, which was also transparent. He appears to mean meatpuppets, but there is no proof there, since we all have separate histories and differences of opinion.
OP knows that I proposed there being a mod in response to his own post calling for roundtables and that he initially supported me wildly in that proposal. I went to Meta at his encouragement. There is no group here that I've "overtaken". I was graciously given modship of Christianity, I selected a few other names via landrush, I had a couple friendly agreements to share modship on a few names.
I suppose if you count two separate incidents, once 5 years ago when I privately asked admin about the goals of c/Christianity and they responded by proposing me for modship, and once here when admin observed the lack of mod on a strongly populated forum and proposed TINAE privately, you might say that admin has twice given an admin-controlled forum to a strong Christian. Seeing how many admin-controlled forums they've given to people of all affiliations, those two don't seem outliers.
I admit that I, like any other contributor is free to, use my leisure to contextualize narratives I think need it. I was initially inspired by Win claiming to be an elite research forum and decided to provide backup when research needed such context. Many others do much the same with their own context, in quite diverse directions, and often with more diligence than me. I don't see that I'm "controlling" anything by that any more than anyone else is.
The statement about a pawn is just disrespectful IMHO. I had nothing to do with you, TINAE, throwing your hat in the ring or being accepted by admin. I am willing to hear any proposal on how things could be done better going forward, but people aren't providing them.
Most of the rest of OP speaks for itself and I'm not thinking of much to add. The interplay between OP being a pursuer of truth and slamming fellow pursuers of truth as being shills for something is amazing. OP apparently judged, shortly after calling me a humble and well-balanced mod candidate, that my opening a free-speech forum for anyone to give any view about satan is somehow a mark of my own evil rather than an opening of a halfway house for those tempted by spiritism; or that my joining an oath-based organization is automatically sinful without any reference to nuanced Christian debate on the subject; or that my making my affiliation public in every way possible is somehow a signal of some hidden plot other than promotion of Jesus Christ alone. I'll give John the last word:
I have no doubt that the truth will out and am stopping myself from being offended for Jesus' sake, Amen.
See? :D
My post is +10/-4 currently but you don't care what the majority here thinks of you... You're here to ban whoever is not licking your boots.
You were NEVER elected by this community.
Enjoy your time being the king of the ashtray.
This place is not an ashtray and you are not here in good faith.
The real war was won before it was fought sir.
Sooner or later you will need real ID to log in almost everywhere and Antifa and Neo-nazis legions will be out killing people door to door.