Is the Iron Dome a hoax? Look into it
(www.bitchute.com)
Comments (53)
sorted by:
Iron dome could also be a money laundering operation. US is giving an extraordinary amount of funding to Israel
Precisely, I'm wondering why it's been so easy for Gaza to do everything they've supposedly been doing if they're using that money for defense.
There are so many videos because it looks cool as shit. Both sides record it.
Of them both clearly colliding in the air? Link one
This bot will not answer your questions because he doesn't have any answers.
They are here only to make the audience doubt your post. Don't give up! Stand for the truth, no matter how many bots go against you!
I know brother. Thankyou for your kind words.
Just know you are never alone in this. No matter how many bots come against you.
By asking a stupid question you only probed En0ch right. The thumbnail you linked show 4 examples I would find.
And, if something didn't exist we wouldn't see so much of it before they moved on to the laser that's on the news now.
Let me know the time stamps
You do it yourself. You made up an argument, no one has to do your work for you.
Can't find it
The Paulstal Service. I miss that channel.
Iron was a German icon. 'Blood and Iron'..........
The Pantheon was a Dome.
So yeah.....Iron Dome...............dance in your enemy's skin, Buffalo Bill. (see MAGA shaman)
There are loads of videos of interception. It does work, and very well. Possibly the best of its kind and it's had a lot of evolution. The problem is obviously the expense, all that funding, mainly patriots, and other munitions, keeping it operating. Hence laser alternatives are emerging, but are still largely prototypes.
Doubtful.
F.e. - https://www.ynetnews.com/article/4kemkv3z2
Five out of nine intercepted - sorry, but it is very poor performance. Better than Patriot, of course :), but still far from ones that are really best of its kind. Even very old S-300 have significantly higher efficiency.
Either Iron Dome designed for the interception of the very specific targets and due to design flaws could not be upgraded for another kind, either it is yet another example of Western weapons made for the sales and shows, not for the battles.
Ep0ch is a bot account. Check his posts/comments to confirm...
The mods don't care about this, but we should stick to each other. That's why I remind you to check his information before you reply again to this bot. He is here just to make viewers doubt the original post.
Don't argue with them, expose them. And if the mods are so useless, we need to take action.
I think he is real person. And probably noticeable part of his comments will be arguing with me. :) If you want action from me against those pesky bots, you could account my dialogues with him as an attempt to distract him from other users. :)
Possibly but it still stops a lot. None are 100%. They can be beaten, by tech. Such as Drones, balloons, more fire than any reload and sam stockpiles.
It's therefore not a hoax. As this topic suggests.
Yes for a lot of new threats emerging, lasers, as well as countined missiles.
There are a few others like perhaps decoys.
The problem also becomes, although the initial impact is shot down, any debris still damage density.
I don't think it is a hoax too. If you are not targeting top efficiency, anti-missile defence system is perfectly doable, and Israel have (had?) enough engineeres to create one, nothing exceptional, especially for the modern tech.
I think the main lie is in the advertised efficiency of that system. Trying to replace real advancements by ads and propaganda for citizens rarely ends nice.
Also, interesting moment - Israel refuse to sell Iron Dome to anybody even if asked, despite AD systems are popular and demanded goods around the world. Reasons for deniai, if any given at all, looks like joke.
Wrong, they are selling it to a few places today. Think Ukraine fell through, dunno, but in Finland, and possibly others.
The main thing about it are, perhaps the coding, and signatures. These have taken an array of expertise and data.
Part of this UFO buzz. Signatures for missile defense.
Still selling, yes. Jews are good in selling. I mean process, not the result for customer.
Really there is nothing special or secret in signatures at all. You are getting few parameters from radar - distance, altitude, speed, trajectory, reflected signal level and so on. Each target have its own set of parameters. For conventional ballistic and cruise missiles and different civilian flying objects, set of parameters is very specific, so you could easily determine the target type and act accordingly. Problems begin with unconventional targets.
Not quite, how were those Kinzhal downed? Why were its scientists charged with supposed treason? Not sure how that went. Or if it was a Kinzhal. But the freaking trajectory on a much faster missile. Come on.
There is an array of data from radar to defenses, a response to it, not simply the trajectory. Easier if there's a lock. What's the lock. What kind of signature? I really dunno. I am not an expert, just well read.
Not all match this. Surely. Hence there are various countermeasures or defenses to those threats.
Yes I agree, there are a lot of adverts and none are 100%. Those adverts are often we downed our own missiles.
The other way some work not by trajectory is simply flash bang detonating prior. It then explodes anything entering its blast radius or damages it enough to prevent larger impact.
Link one pls
No, find it. And simply Google a million hits, time stamped. You're putting forward an argument missile defense is a hoax. Absurd. Literally ridiculous.
Everybody on this Planet knows it works. Hence it needs rearming, funding, and it sells like all other Global arms.
I honestly don't know why you'd suggest it.
Would have been quicker to find one than write this post
You keep asking. YOU would have been quicker.
Can't find any
It's like ads and adblock. Once the other side finds a work around, back to the drawing board.
It really does. I dislike dumb conspiracies like this who are obvious shills, calling for its constant testing.
There was a video yesterday of it intercepting.
Wahaaaa. You sound offended
I haven't got any feelings. Unlike yourself you've turned into a liberal.
We are in the wrong topic. We are talking about missile defenses. Not your feelings.
Those feelings amount too, Arabs can slaughter and kill each other, but as soon as you put Israel in there wahaaa what went wrong. It's so very unfair. It's all Israel's fault Arabs slaughter and kill each other. They should kill Israel instead. Wahaaa.
No, feelings common sense. Keep that shit away from me. I get along with both, obviously, because in England we have large communities of both of them. I don't wind them up. What's the point in that. But as a discussion there is only common sense. It is Israel. That's that country. Arabs have billions of others and they don't all get along either. As far as Jerusalem it's a religious city of diverse religions and their pilgrimages. It cannot function with terrorism.
But the difference is you're prejudice. One sided.
How do I save this video