Is the Iron Dome a hoax? Look into it
(www.bitchute.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (53)
sorted by:
Doubtful.
F.e. - https://www.ynetnews.com/article/4kemkv3z2
Five out of nine intercepted - sorry, but it is very poor performance. Better than Patriot, of course :), but still far from ones that are really best of its kind. Even very old S-300 have significantly higher efficiency.
Either Iron Dome designed for the interception of the very specific targets and due to design flaws could not be upgraded for another kind, either it is yet another example of Western weapons made for the sales and shows, not for the battles.
Ep0ch is a bot account. Check his posts/comments to confirm...
The mods don't care about this, but we should stick to each other. That's why I remind you to check his information before you reply again to this bot. He is here just to make viewers doubt the original post.
Don't argue with them, expose them. And if the mods are so useless, we need to take action.
I think he is real person. And probably noticeable part of his comments will be arguing with me. :) If you want action from me against those pesky bots, you could account my dialogues with him as an attempt to distract him from other users. :)
Possibly but it still stops a lot. None are 100%. They can be beaten, by tech. Such as Drones, balloons, more fire than any reload and sam stockpiles.
It's therefore not a hoax. As this topic suggests.
Yes for a lot of new threats emerging, lasers, as well as countined missiles.
There are a few others like perhaps decoys.
The problem also becomes, although the initial impact is shot down, any debris still damage density.
I don't think it is a hoax too. If you are not targeting top efficiency, anti-missile defence system is perfectly doable, and Israel have (had?) enough engineeres to create one, nothing exceptional, especially for the modern tech.
I think the main lie is in the advertised efficiency of that system. Trying to replace real advancements by ads and propaganda for citizens rarely ends nice.
Also, interesting moment - Israel refuse to sell Iron Dome to anybody even if asked, despite AD systems are popular and demanded goods around the world. Reasons for deniai, if any given at all, looks like joke.
Wrong, they are selling it to a few places today. Think Ukraine fell through, dunno, but in Finland, and possibly others.
The main thing about it are, perhaps the coding, and signatures. These have taken an array of expertise and data.
Part of this UFO buzz. Signatures for missile defense.
Still selling, yes. Jews are good in selling. I mean process, not the result for customer.
Really there is nothing special or secret in signatures at all. You are getting few parameters from radar - distance, altitude, speed, trajectory, reflected signal level and so on. Each target have its own set of parameters. For conventional ballistic and cruise missiles and different civilian flying objects, set of parameters is very specific, so you could easily determine the target type and act accordingly. Problems begin with unconventional targets.