Is the Iron Dome a hoax? Look into it
(www.bitchute.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (53)
sorted by:
There are loads of videos of interception. It does work, and very well. Possibly the best of its kind and it's had a lot of evolution. The problem is obviously the expense, all that funding, mainly patriots, and other munitions, keeping it operating. Hence laser alternatives are emerging, but are still largely prototypes.
Doubtful.
F.e. - https://www.ynetnews.com/article/4kemkv3z2
Five out of nine intercepted - sorry, but it is very poor performance. Better than Patriot, of course :), but still far from ones that are really best of its kind. Even very old S-300 have significantly higher efficiency.
Either Iron Dome designed for the interception of the very specific targets and due to design flaws could not be upgraded for another kind, either it is yet another example of Western weapons made for the sales and shows, not for the battles.
Ep0ch is a bot account. Check his posts/comments to confirm...
The mods don't care about this, but we should stick to each other. That's why I remind you to check his information before you reply again to this bot. He is here just to make viewers doubt the original post.
Don't argue with them, expose them. And if the mods are so useless, we need to take action.
I think he is real person. And probably noticeable part of his comments will be arguing with me. :) If you want action from me against those pesky bots, you could account my dialogues with him as an attempt to distract him from other users. :)
Possibly but it still stops a lot. None are 100%. They can be beaten, by tech. Such as Drones, balloons, more fire than any reload and sam stockpiles.
It's therefore not a hoax. As this topic suggests.
Yes for a lot of new threats emerging, lasers, as well as countined missiles.
There are a few others like perhaps decoys.
The problem also becomes, although the initial impact is shot down, any debris still damage density.
I don't think it is a hoax too. If you are not targeting top efficiency, anti-missile defence system is perfectly doable, and Israel have (had?) enough engineeres to create one, nothing exceptional, especially for the modern tech.
I think the main lie is in the advertised efficiency of that system. Trying to replace real advancements by ads and propaganda for citizens rarely ends nice.
Also, interesting moment - Israel refuse to sell Iron Dome to anybody even if asked, despite AD systems are popular and demanded goods around the world. Reasons for deniai, if any given at all, looks like joke.
Wrong, they are selling it to a few places today. Think Ukraine fell through, dunno, but in Finland, and possibly others.
The main thing about it are, perhaps the coding, and signatures. These have taken an array of expertise and data.
Part of this UFO buzz. Signatures for missile defense.
Link one pls
No, find it. And simply Google a million hits, time stamped. You're putting forward an argument missile defense is a hoax. Absurd. Literally ridiculous.
Everybody on this Planet knows it works. Hence it needs rearming, funding, and it sells like all other Global arms.
I honestly don't know why you'd suggest it.
Would have been quicker to find one than write this post
You keep asking. YOU would have been quicker.
It's like ads and adblock. Once the other side finds a work around, back to the drawing board.
It really does. I dislike dumb conspiracies like this who are obvious shills, calling for its constant testing.
There was a video yesterday of it intercepting.
Wahaaaa. You sound offended