Is the Iron Dome a hoax? Look into it
(www.bitchute.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (53)
sorted by:
Possibly but it still stops a lot. None are 100%. They can be beaten, by tech. Such as Drones, balloons, more fire than any reload and sam stockpiles.
It's therefore not a hoax. As this topic suggests.
Yes for a lot of new threats emerging, lasers, as well as countined missiles.
There are a few others like perhaps decoys.
The problem also becomes, although the initial impact is shot down, any debris still damage density.
I don't think it is a hoax too. If you are not targeting top efficiency, anti-missile defence system is perfectly doable, and Israel have (had?) enough engineeres to create one, nothing exceptional, especially for the modern tech.
I think the main lie is in the advertised efficiency of that system. Trying to replace real advancements by ads and propaganda for citizens rarely ends nice.
Also, interesting moment - Israel refuse to sell Iron Dome to anybody even if asked, despite AD systems are popular and demanded goods around the world. Reasons for deniai, if any given at all, looks like joke.
Wrong, they are selling it to a few places today. Think Ukraine fell through, dunno, but in Finland, and possibly others.
The main thing about it are, perhaps the coding, and signatures. These have taken an array of expertise and data.
Part of this UFO buzz. Signatures for missile defense.
Still selling, yes. Jews are good in selling. I mean process, not the result for customer.
Really there is nothing special or secret in signatures at all. You are getting few parameters from radar - distance, altitude, speed, trajectory, reflected signal level and so on. Each target have its own set of parameters. For conventional ballistic and cruise missiles and different civilian flying objects, set of parameters is very specific, so you could easily determine the target type and act accordingly. Problems begin with unconventional targets.
Not quite, how were those Kinzhal downed? Why were its scientists charged with supposed treason? Not sure how that went. Or if it was a Kinzhal. But the freaking trajectory on a much faster missile. Come on.
There is an array of data from radar to defenses, a response to it, not simply the trajectory. Easier if there's a lock. What's the lock. What kind of signature? I really dunno. I am not an expert, just well read.
Not all match this. Surely. Hence there are various countermeasures or defenses to those threats.
Yes I agree, there are a lot of adverts and none are 100%. Those adverts are often we downed our own missiles.
The other way some work not by trajectory is simply flash bang detonating prior. It then explodes anything entering its blast radius or damages it enough to prevent larger impact.