Knowing what kind of celebrities visited that Dalai-Lama guy for false virtues there is nothing unexpected at all.
I don't think buddhists are pedos in mass. I'm not even shure that this Dalai-Lama accounted as a higher authority for all buddhist varieties. Just if you are not pedo, you are not allowed to be f.e. famous and valued among elites person or a top politician, or a CEO of corporation and so on.
Things will change when pedofiles will be normalised. What will be used next instead? Coprophagy? Necrophilia?
They are very pedos. Some of the worst. Perhaps not as bad as Islam. It is what is.
Hate this topic so much but it gets real fucking dark. They only added child's rights a few decades ago. They home millions of kids. But it hasn't changed much. Some of those traditions are shocking. On the exterior is a different story.
Type of stuff like the most renown Buddhist tiger sanctuary selling the tiger parts. Literally trafficking the tigers.
As far as it being widespread in that culture look at those links. Unsafe places for children, practically being put into law.
Never mind the amount of concurrent rape occurring to any dumb millennials seeking the enlightenment.
I used to think they were clean. Until the tiger sanctuary shocked the crap out of me. Then I remember watching a host of movies on the Buddhist, trafficking. So many right? They were trafficking the kids.
Don't want to know more apart from the millions of hits on simple searches. Not a topic I want to digress more of. It gets dark. The kids bathe their gurus.
As a generalisation I thought better of them. No they're like all religions. Probably worse in some regards because any Eastern philosophy caused the gender diaspora. It reincarnated identifying as the freak knows.
Yea, mouth full of vagina. You tell yourself this. Such innocent monks.
No. Children had no rights in Buddhism until 1971.
They put them through a gauntlet. Shaolin. How many die. Kids are given to Buddhism What happens. Rest of Buddhism sell kids to pervets like Jimmy Savile, he had the Buddhist enlightment training, like they give them to monastery. It's the Tiger Sanctuary, making the Chinese medicines, entire freezers full of tiger parts, fresh carcasses, profiting off of all the free tigers. Same as Elephant sanctuary. Buddhists paved over Ganesh. It was the first marker on the Asian trade routes. Then Buddha. But the children. Read the Wiki. No sin in Buddhism. They weren't wiping his monkship's arse. Why is he shoving a tongue down their throat? They bathe with the gurus. They dress him. Why? Supreme leader tells what to do. Those monks aren't celibate. Buddhism doesn't forbid intercourse. Celibate don't marry. Not, not fuck.
Happening look at all those links I can bring up millions more, decades and decades of it.
It just so happens to be the religion you like. The karmic one. You can come back in the next life as a clam. It doesn't matter if you identify as a vagina. Buddhism has provided the perfect philosophy?
Tell me it ain't so. Please? Convince it isn't corrupted. Look at the causality.
a) an -IST (buddhist) implies ones consent to a suggested -ISM (buddhism)...that represents each one of the many willingly submitting to the suggesting few. Submission implies ones choice to ignore resisting, which in return tempts others to exploit lack of resistance.
b) mass submission gives power of consent to rebellious behavior of the few, who in return rebel against the submissive many.
c) submissiveness; lack of resistance and shirking of response-ability (free will of choice) represents adulthood guilt, which in return tempts others to abuse childhood innocence. The few are being pushed by guilt and hence drawn to innocence...
d) you thinking through the lens of reason (do vs don't) represents that guilt of conflicting thoughts about suggested information, while ignoring to think in response to perceivable inspiration. Others tempts one into these conflicts of reason, and the more one consents to mental conflicts leading towards physical consequences...the less protected children are.
What will be used next
Your want for suggested outcomes (progressivism), while ignoring perceivable origin, will keep tempting you to want more, while diminishing your resistance (living) within origin (process of dying).
In short...suggested "next" (outcome of motion) tempts one to ignore perceivable "now" (momentum of motion).
Amish? True Amish, not just the people who don't use electricity who live in the same area. Amish are very strict on who is and isn't a member of their church.
All pedos can rot in hell. What if I told you though that if you contextualize what the dahli lama said to that child, and the action of the kiss, was like your grandpa giving you a kiss and saying he loved you.
Don't believe me though. Look into Tibetan culture. See what you find.
Is there any religion or government that has not been completely compromised?
a) RELIGION (Latin religio; to bind anew)...those who consent to what others are suggesting are willingly binding themselves to the choices of others, which implies compromise of ones free will of choice.
Being bound anew implies COMPROMISE, noun - "to give bond; to promise; a mutual contract of two parties in controversy, to refer their differences to the decision of arbitrators"
b) same shit with consenting to suggested information; hence giving those who suggest the power to GOVERN (control) ones MENT (mind/memory) through the suggested information.
c) suggested "complete" (whole) tempts perceiving partial to ignore perceivable whole.
I had the thought the Dali lama was sucking on a childs tongues in public because his main source of entertainment was gone when Epstein and maxwell were busted.
But we all know, its very likely that they just replaced epstein with some other psychopath pedophile.
He just wanted her soup recipe for cream of sum yung guy
Knowing what kind of celebrities visited that Dalai-Lama guy for false virtues there is nothing unexpected at all.
I don't think buddhists are pedos in mass. I'm not even shure that this Dalai-Lama accounted as a higher authority for all buddhist varieties. Just if you are not pedo, you are not allowed to be f.e. famous and valued among elites person or a top politician, or a CEO of corporation and so on.
Things will change when pedofiles will be normalised. What will be used next instead? Coprophagy? Necrophilia?
They actually are.
https://religionnews.com/2013/06/20/bhtuans-buddhist-monks-accused-of-sexually-molesting-boys/
https://m.phnompenhpost.com/national/monk-charged-raping-nine-boys
https://www.buddhistdoor.net/news/buddhist-monk-arrested-in-bodh-gaya-for-alleged-physical-and-sexual-abuse-of-15-novice-monks/
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-south-asia-15507304
https://www.bangkokpost.com/opinion/opinion/1782969/temples-no-longer-safe-for-children
https://www.elephantjournal.com/2013/06/what-lies-beneath-the-robes-are-buddhist-monasteries-suitable-places-for-children-adele-wilde-blavatsky/
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2R2SKSe8Pwc
They are very pedos. Some of the worst. Perhaps not as bad as Islam. It is what is.
Hate this topic so much but it gets real fucking dark. They only added child's rights a few decades ago. They home millions of kids. But it hasn't changed much. Some of those traditions are shocking. On the exterior is a different story.
Type of stuff like the most renown Buddhist tiger sanctuary selling the tiger parts. Literally trafficking the tigers.
Every power structure has criminal perverts and they can all rot in hell.
Buddhists especially.
Where do the perverts go? Tell me these cultures?
As far as it being widespread in that culture look at those links. Unsafe places for children, practically being put into law.
Never mind the amount of concurrent rape occurring to any dumb millennials seeking the enlightenment.
I used to think they were clean. Until the tiger sanctuary shocked the crap out of me. Then I remember watching a host of movies on the Buddhist, trafficking. So many right? They were trafficking the kids.
Don't want to know more apart from the millions of hits on simple searches. Not a topic I want to digress more of. It gets dark. The kids bathe their gurus.
As a generalisation I thought better of them. No they're like all religions. Probably worse in some regards because any Eastern philosophy caused the gender diaspora. It reincarnated identifying as the freak knows.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhism_and_sexual_orientation
I think you're mistaken about most of that.
Yea, mouth full of vagina. You tell yourself this. Such innocent monks.
No. Children had no rights in Buddhism until 1971.
They put them through a gauntlet. Shaolin. How many die. Kids are given to Buddhism What happens. Rest of Buddhism sell kids to pervets like Jimmy Savile, he had the Buddhist enlightment training, like they give them to monastery. It's the Tiger Sanctuary, making the Chinese medicines, entire freezers full of tiger parts, fresh carcasses, profiting off of all the free tigers. Same as Elephant sanctuary. Buddhists paved over Ganesh. It was the first marker on the Asian trade routes. Then Buddha. But the children. Read the Wiki. No sin in Buddhism. They weren't wiping his monkship's arse. Why is he shoving a tongue down their throat? They bathe with the gurus. They dress him. Why? Supreme leader tells what to do. Those monks aren't celibate. Buddhism doesn't forbid intercourse. Celibate don't marry. Not, not fuck.
Happening look at all those links I can bring up millions more, decades and decades of it.
It just so happens to be the religion you like. The karmic one. You can come back in the next life as a clam. It doesn't matter if you identify as a vagina. Buddhism has provided the perfect philosophy?
Tell me it ain't so. Please? Convince it isn't corrupted. Look at the causality.
a) an -IST (buddhist) implies ones consent to a suggested -ISM (buddhism)...that represents each one of the many willingly submitting to the suggesting few. Submission implies ones choice to ignore resisting, which in return tempts others to exploit lack of resistance.
b) mass submission gives power of consent to rebellious behavior of the few, who in return rebel against the submissive many.
c) submissiveness; lack of resistance and shirking of response-ability (free will of choice) represents adulthood guilt, which in return tempts others to abuse childhood innocence. The few are being pushed by guilt and hence drawn to innocence...
d) you thinking through the lens of reason (do vs don't) represents that guilt of conflicting thoughts about suggested information, while ignoring to think in response to perceivable inspiration. Others tempts one into these conflicts of reason, and the more one consents to mental conflicts leading towards physical consequences...the less protected children are.
Your want for suggested outcomes (progressivism), while ignoring perceivable origin, will keep tempting you to want more, while diminishing your resistance (living) within origin (process of dying).
In short...suggested "next" (outcome of motion) tempts one to ignore perceivable "now" (momentum of motion).
Remember, they will take out all religions except for judaism. That was always the plan.
Protocol #4: https://web.archive.org/web/20150503192701/http://www.iamthewitness.com/books/Protocols.of.Zion/Protocol.04.Materialism.to.Replace.Religion.htm
Amish? True Amish, not just the people who don't use electricity who live in the same area. Amish are very strict on who is and isn't a member of their church.
Dalai Lama bent the knee.
https://www.davidsanger.com/stockimages/9-340-21.dalaiwall
He was installed by the CCP who at perma-war with Tibet.
Religion is a cancer on the world
W...whatabout?
All pedos can rot in hell. What if I told you though that if you contextualize what the dahli lama said to that child, and the action of the kiss, was like your grandpa giving you a kiss and saying he loved you.
Don't believe me though. Look into Tibetan culture. See what you find.
There are ultimately two groups. True Christians and everyone else.
a) RELIGION (Latin religio; to bind anew)...those who consent to what others are suggesting are willingly binding themselves to the choices of others, which implies compromise of ones free will of choice.
Being bound anew implies COMPROMISE, noun - "to give bond; to promise; a mutual contract of two parties in controversy, to refer their differences to the decision of arbitrators"
b) same shit with consenting to suggested information; hence giving those who suggest the power to GOVERN (control) ones MENT (mind/memory) through the suggested information.
c) suggested "complete" (whole) tempts perceiving partial to ignore perceivable whole.
...bound to those suggesting Buddhism.
Shaking hands with someone at a meeting doesn't mean they are involved in crime together. Have some standards of evidence.
Ghislaine went to jail and now the FBI are slow-dripping her entire "celebrity handshakes" photo album. It's kind of like revenge porn in a way.
I had the thought the Dali lama was sucking on a childs tongues in public because his main source of entertainment was gone when Epstein and maxwell were busted.
But we all know, its very likely that they just replaced epstein with some other psychopath pedophile.