Knowing what kind of celebrities visited that Dalai-Lama guy for false virtues there is nothing unexpected at all.
I don't think buddhists are pedos in mass. I'm not even shure that this Dalai-Lama accounted as a higher authority for all buddhist varieties. Just if you are not pedo, you are not allowed to be f.e. famous and valued among elites person or a top politician, or a CEO of corporation and so on.
Things will change when pedofiles will be normalised. What will be used next instead? Coprophagy? Necrophilia?
They are very pedos. Some of the worst. Perhaps not as bad as Islam. It is what is.
Hate this topic so much but it gets real fucking dark. They only added child's rights a few decades ago. They home millions of kids. But it hasn't changed much. Some of those traditions are shocking. On the exterior is a different story.
Type of stuff like the most renown Buddhist tiger sanctuary selling the tiger parts. Literally trafficking the tigers.
As far as it being widespread in that culture look at those links. Unsafe places for children, practically being put into law.
Never mind the amount of concurrent rape occurring to any dumb millennials seeking the enlightenment.
I used to think they were clean. Until the tiger sanctuary shocked the crap out of me. Then I remember watching a host of movies on the Buddhist, trafficking. So many right? They were trafficking the kids.
Don't want to know more apart from the millions of hits on simple searches. Not a topic I want to digress more of. It gets dark. The kids bathe their gurus.
As a generalisation I thought better of them. No they're like all religions. Probably worse in some regards because any Eastern philosophy caused the gender diaspora. It reincarnated identifying as the freak knows.
a) an -IST (buddhist) implies ones consent to a suggested -ISM (buddhism)...that represents each one of the many willingly submitting to the suggesting few. Submission implies ones choice to ignore resisting, which in return tempts others to exploit lack of resistance.
b) mass submission gives power of consent to rebellious behavior of the few, who in return rebel against the submissive many.
c) submissiveness; lack of resistance and shirking of response-ability (free will of choice) represents adulthood guilt, which in return tempts others to abuse childhood innocence. The few are being pushed by guilt and hence drawn to innocence...
d) you thinking through the lens of reason (do vs don't) represents that guilt of conflicting thoughts about suggested information, while ignoring to think in response to perceivable inspiration. Others tempts one into these conflicts of reason, and the more one consents to mental conflicts leading towards physical consequences...the less protected children are.
What will be used next
Your want for suggested outcomes (progressivism), while ignoring perceivable origin, will keep tempting you to want more, while diminishing your resistance (living) within origin (process of dying).
In short...suggested "next" (outcome of motion) tempts one to ignore perceivable "now" (momentum of motion).
Knowing what kind of celebrities visited that Dalai-Lama guy for false virtues there is nothing unexpected at all.
I don't think buddhists are pedos in mass. I'm not even shure that this Dalai-Lama accounted as a higher authority for all buddhist varieties. Just if you are not pedo, you are not allowed to be f.e. famous and valued among elites person or a top politician, or a CEO of corporation and so on.
Things will change when pedofiles will be normalised. What will be used next instead? Coprophagy? Necrophilia?
They actually are.
https://religionnews.com/2013/06/20/bhtuans-buddhist-monks-accused-of-sexually-molesting-boys/
https://m.phnompenhpost.com/national/monk-charged-raping-nine-boys
https://www.buddhistdoor.net/news/buddhist-monk-arrested-in-bodh-gaya-for-alleged-physical-and-sexual-abuse-of-15-novice-monks/
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-south-asia-15507304
https://www.bangkokpost.com/opinion/opinion/1782969/temples-no-longer-safe-for-children
https://www.elephantjournal.com/2013/06/what-lies-beneath-the-robes-are-buddhist-monasteries-suitable-places-for-children-adele-wilde-blavatsky/
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2R2SKSe8Pwc
They are very pedos. Some of the worst. Perhaps not as bad as Islam. It is what is.
Hate this topic so much but it gets real fucking dark. They only added child's rights a few decades ago. They home millions of kids. But it hasn't changed much. Some of those traditions are shocking. On the exterior is a different story.
Type of stuff like the most renown Buddhist tiger sanctuary selling the tiger parts. Literally trafficking the tigers.
Every power structure has criminal perverts and they can all rot in hell.
Buddhists especially.
Where do the perverts go? Tell me these cultures?
As far as it being widespread in that culture look at those links. Unsafe places for children, practically being put into law.
Never mind the amount of concurrent rape occurring to any dumb millennials seeking the enlightenment.
I used to think they were clean. Until the tiger sanctuary shocked the crap out of me. Then I remember watching a host of movies on the Buddhist, trafficking. So many right? They were trafficking the kids.
Don't want to know more apart from the millions of hits on simple searches. Not a topic I want to digress more of. It gets dark. The kids bathe their gurus.
As a generalisation I thought better of them. No they're like all religions. Probably worse in some regards because any Eastern philosophy caused the gender diaspora. It reincarnated identifying as the freak knows.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhism_and_sexual_orientation
I think you're mistaken about most of that.
a) an -IST (buddhist) implies ones consent to a suggested -ISM (buddhism)...that represents each one of the many willingly submitting to the suggesting few. Submission implies ones choice to ignore resisting, which in return tempts others to exploit lack of resistance.
b) mass submission gives power of consent to rebellious behavior of the few, who in return rebel against the submissive many.
c) submissiveness; lack of resistance and shirking of response-ability (free will of choice) represents adulthood guilt, which in return tempts others to abuse childhood innocence. The few are being pushed by guilt and hence drawn to innocence...
d) you thinking through the lens of reason (do vs don't) represents that guilt of conflicting thoughts about suggested information, while ignoring to think in response to perceivable inspiration. Others tempts one into these conflicts of reason, and the more one consents to mental conflicts leading towards physical consequences...the less protected children are.
Your want for suggested outcomes (progressivism), while ignoring perceivable origin, will keep tempting you to want more, while diminishing your resistance (living) within origin (process of dying).
In short...suggested "next" (outcome of motion) tempts one to ignore perceivable "now" (momentum of motion).