if germ theory is based on a false area of biology, that PROVES without a doubt that TPTB have so much influence that they can literally create FAKE areas of science. fake sciences that some of our brightest dedicate there life too.
its scary to think that someone who society has deemed an expert has no more idea then your average joe. we are taught from the get go, that if we need answers we seek out the advice of experts.
there is no area more prominently effected by this then medicine.
One might find them selves asking a question.. how could this even be? how could our best and brightest simply not know?
the real question you should be asking yourself is not weather this is possible, instead ask yourself what other "sciences" are based on unproven models.
I agree with this analysis, and I believe it extends to all other areas of life where "normies" reject evidence out of hand. What I liken it to is the way many of us were teased as children: being told we were adopted. Sound silly? Let me explain.
As a child, if another child told you that were told you were adopted, it would certainly be quite a significant revelation and alteration to your worldview. Rationally, you should have asked them for all the information they had on the matter, discussed with them the context and reliability of it, etc.
But that's not what happened, was it? You immediately rejected the claim, never asked for proof, perhaps even attacked the claimant. In hindsight, that is quite a perverse reaction, is it not? Well, not really, not if you look deeper for the true context.
You see, your subconscious evaluated the claim and found that it could plausibly be true. And here is the key: it also found that you had absolutely no ability to deal effectively with this alteration to your world and you place in it. None.
This is an extreme form of cognitive dissonance and demanded immediate action. Since nothing was to be done about the effects of the claim, the claim itself had to go. In what is really an act of psychic self-defense, the claim is violently rejected.
So reasoning with people in such a state is fruitless. It'll work about as well as soothing a child with, "For most practical and legal purposes, adopted children are treated identically with natural children." See how well that goes over.
all very true
The deeper root of most false science is the fairytale know as the theory of evolution.
a) suggested information (understanding) represents the fairy tale; which tempts one to ignore perceivable inspiration (knowledge) for reasoning (want vs not want) about suggested theories.
b) EVOLU (to unfold; open; expand) -TION (through action)...that represents the status quo of reaction (living) within enacting (dying) aka temporary growth within ongoing loss.
In that regard: science (perceivable reality) or scientism (suggested fiction)...your free will of choice between need (perceivable inspiration) or want (suggested information).
If you choose want over need; then you find yourself within the want vs not want conflict of reason; which those making the suggestions can rebrand into true vs false; good vs bad; believing vs not believing; leftwing vs rightwing; rich vs poor; nationalism vs internationalism; spandex vs leather and so on.
Absolutely. Mauro biglino official channel youtube English subtitles..an Italian Catholic who was employed by Vatican publishers as an expert in old hebrew Greek Latin and others..until he uncovered so much the catholics don't want known. about our beginnings .
There were 13 gan edins ..Adam came from elsewhere and placed in they think one in mesopotamia..then they...the Elohim.... adapted and created animals and fruit and veggies grain..then Eve. It says "from the sleeping body of Adam they take something the term is "rib" but, in reality, it means " side part" this said by rabbi Egael Safran, university professor of medical ethics in Jerusalem "no problem here. The Bible has known about cloning for 4000 years"
Hybrids were made when the Elohim 240 odd ..mainly men..had sex with the adamites...producing nefilim..giants..Nimrod Hercules Gilgamesh etc. The hominids were tinkered with using the blood and semen of young Elohim.
I am staggered at the immense fraud of the religions involved that one of the Elohim.. yahweh..the mass murderering governor of the tribe of Jacob not only set up a money system in Deuteronomy using usury so the Israelites would always dominate the world.. Rothschild federal reserve central banking.......but also circumsion both sexes . .abortion as the Elohim wanted more females and aborted males. Passing the first born through the fire..went on until Josiah 7th century changed it to a ransom. instituted slavery.. the census and using people as a commodity... also the corrupt law systems .
There is far too much evidence even in the bibles they keep altering..again last month new printing of bibles for public..KJ bible Jerusalem Bible etc changed to show Elohim as singular even the Mormon Bible changed to singular with plural Elohim note in the margin.
In kings there is one Elohim king of Samaria. Son of jezebel...fell out of window.. frightened he might die..sent to ask for help from Elohim Baal zebub Elohim of Ekron.
Another Baal Per got turned into a devil because his rituals included sex so people abandoned Yahweh and his wife asherah and for this was punished.
Baal Per became belphegor along with beezlebub...changed to devils from Elohim.
If Jesus is yahweh s only begotten son..contrary to what is in the Bible then Jesus is a hybrid born of a hybrid and fathered by an Elohim.
Mary at 12 was put in Joseph's care in yahweh temple..there since she was three as her mother too old to have a child was visited by a gavri EL and had Mary while her husband was away on business and Mary was promised to the temple at three years of age.
The Bible says Mary was covered by a gavri EL.
The gospel of Peter who was a disciple and wrote that he saw jesus taken down from the cross alive and put in the tomb. Lights in the sky..two men entered the tomb three came out one being supported.
Where is this gospel? Forbidden like many others and the four gospels said to be by four disciples were no such thing and written hundred years later.
Ezekiel describes a chariot he was taken up a mountain in..NASA copied it and PATENTED it. The Mahabharata describes the same space shuttles...
Now we know the name of NASA guy and when ..so do you think that the head of the military Flynn and his brother don't know such a shattering thing..not a god or gods but vicious aliens
Is this why Israel bombed Syria civilian airport last week? They think they have a "divine right" to Syria... yahweh an alien promised it to them
Isn't this all fraud and racketeering?
Mauro biglino the naked bible
Https://youtu.be./DfY2KIKr34
https://youtu.be/WijP_yczjbE
I have just checked and it says that video is not available so this one goes into Elohim root word etc in great depth
I had sent one where so many different Elohim are mentioned in kings and if I find it I will put it on here for you.
https://youtu.be/UcrWgvkTujM. This is a two minute video about gospel of Peter
Too many suggested names within a perceivable system that doesn't brand anything. To many suggested places within a perceivable system placing only within momentum. Too many suggested numbers; when ALL perceivable designates itself through self differentiation into each perceiving "ONE".
Flow (male velocity) to momentum (balance) to form (female resistance). Rib represents enclosed by on both sides; hence form (life) enclosed by flow (inception towards death).
Adaptation implies as reaction (living) to enacted (dying); while suggested creationism (implies out of nothing) tempts one to ignore perceivable transmutation (implies out of everything).
Flow to form (inception); form within flow (life); form to flow (death) represents ingredient living transmuted out of base dying. To tackle creationism...ask yourself if you can create any new thought without shaping it out of already perceivable ingredients? Start smaller...can you create words without shaping them out of letters? Next step..can you create suggestible words without shaping them out of perceivable sound? Finally...can choice "act" when it represents a reaction to perceivable balance (need/want)?
Cloning suggested represents "duplication" aka equality (sameness); which ignores that the perceiving within perceivable can only sense diversity (differences). The origin of the function of cloning (out of the same source) represents the status quo of existence aka each one (growth) within all (loss) cloned from the oneness (energy) of all (growth/loss balance).
In other words...all represents one in energy, so everything within can only be "cloned" from it; which again ties to transmutation out of base.
Ignoring a self differentiating system by mixing the differences back together (e pluribus unum; out of many one aka miscegenation) represents HYB'RID, noun [Gr. injury, force, rape; Latin hybrida.] - "a mongrel produced from mixture".
RELIGON; noun (Latin religio) - "to bind anew"; which represents choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law; the inversion of perceivable balance (enacting) to choice (reacting) natural law.
Anything suggested within religions is being defined (idolatry); redefined (revisionism) and contradicted (talmudic reasoning) by the few making the suggestions towards the consenting many.
Before that comes choice (suggested monetary value) to choice (consent to it) contract law; in ignorance of balance (all value) to choice (ones evaluation) natural law. The highest value within all existence represents ones evaluation thereof. Those who ignore this for suggested values are devaluating themselves.
Based on the many ignoring that form cannot claim anything within flow without attaching themselves to it; while ignoring the need to resist being moved towards death. This is why choice of want represents temptation luring towards death; while choice of need represents responsibility to sustain life by adaptation.
The parasitic few simply claim those who ignore resisting; while tempting them with suggested progressivism to keep going with the flow; to keep wanting what others suggest.
Sorry..didn't understand a word you said. If you are saying there wasn't Adam and Eve or aliens etc ..I think you could argue we are not really here either.
You should get a job with government...you could answer pressing questions without answering any points taking up many pages
Comprehension needs to be grown by adaptation to perceivable inspiration; while resisting the temptation to stand under (understanding) suggested information. Try taking anything I wrote about while putting it into your perspective of comprehension. To avoid "understanding" try using implication (if/then) over reason (want vs not want; true vs false etc.).
a) all that was implies as suggested by those who are...I resist that temptation for adaptation to all that is perceivable. In other words...I resist ignoring that which perceptibly is for that which others suggest was (past) or will be (future).
b) A'LIEN, adjective [Latin alienus, from alius, another.]...for the perceiving ONE within the perceivable ALL; everyone else represents "another". Others represent the aliens I can perceive and need to adapt to.
c) AD'AM, noun (heb; man) + MAN, noun [heb.species, kind, image, similitude.] Once again I can perceive similar behavior; shaped by choices responding to a balance based system.
d) EVE; noun - "even; level; balance".
e) "here" implies the momentum of motion aka the perceivable ever changing moment, while "not really" aka nothing reality represents your choice to ignore perceivable everything (reality) for suggested nothing (fiction).
f) "you could argue" represents you perpetuating reason (wanting vs not wanting a suggestion) by suggesting it to me. Do I need to argue with breathing; thirst; hunger or lack of shelter or do I need to adapt nonetheless? One doesn't need to argue over perceivable; yet one is tempted to ignore perceivable, while arguing about suggested.
GOVERN (to control) MENT (from Latin mens; mind; from Greek; memory)...it's your consent to the suggested information by others which gives them the power to define; redefine and contradict what you willingly put into your memory.
As for job...EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power"...that's where one works.
A question implies ones "want" for suggested answers; which ignores the "need" to adapt to everything perceivable as to grow ones lack of comprehension thereof. Everything is offered to you (perception); yet you are tricked to seek confirmation from others (suggestion). Only your free will of choice can change that.
Also; impression (perception) to compression (comprehension) for either expression (growth) or repression (loss). Madonna put it like this..."express yourself; don't repress yourself"..."and I'm not sorry; it's human nature".
What if one can adapt to inspiration which then allows less restricted expression of comprehension? What if others don't need to write for your want of confirmation; but can utilize you as a source of inspiration to adapt to for their own growth of comprehension?
I think there is a name for people like you..I don't want to get banned so I won't say it.
Meanwhile can I say you need to do some serious growing up
Nigger; don't be such a kike and fucking say it instead of being a cunt about it...anyway; does perceivable inspiration require suggested "names" to be perceivable?
On it...growing comprehension by adaption to perceivable inspiration. Btw growing up represents living life; maturity equals death.
This is just bots in the comment section.
Christianity.
Money is the root of all evil. Well, the people that control the money, really. Scientists are finically invested in their work. They spent their whole lives on this career, they have families to feed, that sort of thing. Also, and probably a bigger problem, is that education is basically an "appeal to authority" training camp. Issac Newton couldn't have possibly been lying, right guys?!?! My textbook totally says theres proof that mass attracts mass!! They never bother to actually look into the basics of the major scientific beliefs because they believe others already have and they dont get funded for those sorts of things.
I'll put it this way: I believe in germ theory because I haven't run into a situation where it isn't predictive of events. Bill isn't feeling well, if I imagine he's got little 'don't feel well' bugs on him that could jump onto me, then I also won't feel well. But if we let the bugs die, then proximity to Bill won't make me feel unwell anymore.
But!
I'm open to being converted, because I see in physics how they invent dark energy and dark matter to balance their observations with the equations. You can't go faster than C. But also things move faster than C and that's because um, because, um, ...it grows faster for no real reason?
I see that modern science is mostly farse, I just haven't seen a reason to disbelieve germ theory or round Earth.
bro im looking in to different aspects of physics also and your totally correct, there is alot of nonsense there also, my personal favorite is watching them try and explain why or how the sun effects weather and cloud formation.
Science represents perceivable inspiration for growth of ones comprehension. Scientism represents suggested information to tempt one to understand (stand under) other ones.
a) nature doesn't suggest true or false information; it first differentiates (all perceivable into each one perceiving it); then communicates perceivable inspiration (moving differences) by simply moving everything.
b) true vs false represents a rebrand of wanting vs not wanting suggested information; while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable inspiration.
a) what if the few utilize suggestion to tempt the many to ignore knowledge (perception)?
b) what if choice represents the center of a balance based system? What if each ONE (perceiving) represents the center of ALL (perceivable)?
c) if the few suggest the "best and brightest"; then could that tempt the many to ignore growing themselves while following others?
As temporary form (life) within ongoing flow (inception towards death) aka living within the process of dying, one represents the temporary resistance (growth) within the ongoing velocity (loss).
What if the parasitic few suggest the many to ignore resisting; hence feeding their fleeting resistance as "a contribution to a general loss"?