if germ theory is based on a false area of biology, that PROVES without a doubt that TPTB have so much influence that they can literally create FAKE areas of science. fake sciences that some of our brightest dedicate there life too.
its scary to think that someone who society has deemed an expert has no more idea then your average joe. we are taught from the get go, that if we need answers we seek out the advice of experts.
there is no area more prominently effected by this then medicine.
One might find them selves asking a question.. how could this even be? how could our best and brightest simply not know?
the real question you should be asking yourself is not weather this is possible, instead ask yourself what other "sciences" are based on unproven models.
Too many suggested names within a perceivable system that doesn't brand anything. To many suggested places within a perceivable system placing only within momentum. Too many suggested numbers; when ALL perceivable designates itself through self differentiation into each perceiving "ONE".
Flow (male velocity) to momentum (balance) to form (female resistance). Rib represents enclosed by on both sides; hence form (life) enclosed by flow (inception towards death).
Adaptation implies as reaction (living) to enacted (dying); while suggested creationism (implies out of nothing) tempts one to ignore perceivable transmutation (implies out of everything).
Flow to form (inception); form within flow (life); form to flow (death) represents ingredient living transmuted out of base dying. To tackle creationism...ask yourself if you can create any new thought without shaping it out of already perceivable ingredients? Start smaller...can you create words without shaping them out of letters? Next step..can you create suggestible words without shaping them out of perceivable sound? Finally...can choice "act" when it represents a reaction to perceivable balance (need/want)?
Cloning suggested represents "duplication" aka equality (sameness); which ignores that the perceiving within perceivable can only sense diversity (differences). The origin of the function of cloning (out of the same source) represents the status quo of existence aka each one (growth) within all (loss) cloned from the oneness (energy) of all (growth/loss balance).
In other words...all represents one in energy, so everything within can only be "cloned" from it; which again ties to transmutation out of base.
Ignoring a self differentiating system by mixing the differences back together (e pluribus unum; out of many one aka miscegenation) represents HYB'RID, noun [Gr. injury, force, rape; Latin hybrida.] - "a mongrel produced from mixture".
RELIGON; noun (Latin religio) - "to bind anew"; which represents choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law; the inversion of perceivable balance (enacting) to choice (reacting) natural law.
Anything suggested within religions is being defined (idolatry); redefined (revisionism) and contradicted (talmudic reasoning) by the few making the suggestions towards the consenting many.
Before that comes choice (suggested monetary value) to choice (consent to it) contract law; in ignorance of balance (all value) to choice (ones evaluation) natural law. The highest value within all existence represents ones evaluation thereof. Those who ignore this for suggested values are devaluating themselves.
Based on the many ignoring that form cannot claim anything within flow without attaching themselves to it; while ignoring the need to resist being moved towards death. This is why choice of want represents temptation luring towards death; while choice of need represents responsibility to sustain life by adaptation.
The parasitic few simply claim those who ignore resisting; while tempting them with suggested progressivism to keep going with the flow; to keep wanting what others suggest.
Sorry..didn't understand a word you said. If you are saying there wasn't Adam and Eve or aliens etc ..I think you could argue we are not really here either.
You should get a job with government...you could answer pressing questions without answering any points taking up many pages
Comprehension needs to be grown by adaptation to perceivable inspiration; while resisting the temptation to stand under (understanding) suggested information. Try taking anything I wrote about while putting it into your perspective of comprehension. To avoid "understanding" try using implication (if/then) over reason (want vs not want; true vs false etc.).
a) all that was implies as suggested by those who are...I resist that temptation for adaptation to all that is perceivable. In other words...I resist ignoring that which perceptibly is for that which others suggest was (past) or will be (future).
b) A'LIEN, adjective [Latin alienus, from alius, another.]...for the perceiving ONE within the perceivable ALL; everyone else represents "another". Others represent the aliens I can perceive and need to adapt to.
c) AD'AM, noun (heb; man) + MAN, noun [heb.species, kind, image, similitude.] Once again I can perceive similar behavior; shaped by choices responding to a balance based system.
d) EVE; noun - "even; level; balance".
e) "here" implies the momentum of motion aka the perceivable ever changing moment, while "not really" aka nothing reality represents your choice to ignore perceivable everything (reality) for suggested nothing (fiction).
f) "you could argue" represents you perpetuating reason (wanting vs not wanting a suggestion) by suggesting it to me. Do I need to argue with breathing; thirst; hunger or lack of shelter or do I need to adapt nonetheless? One doesn't need to argue over perceivable; yet one is tempted to ignore perceivable, while arguing about suggested.
GOVERN (to control) MENT (from Latin mens; mind; from Greek; memory)...it's your consent to the suggested information by others which gives them the power to define; redefine and contradict what you willingly put into your memory.
As for job...EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power"...that's where one works.
A question implies ones "want" for suggested answers; which ignores the "need" to adapt to everything perceivable as to grow ones lack of comprehension thereof. Everything is offered to you (perception); yet you are tricked to seek confirmation from others (suggestion). Only your free will of choice can change that.
Also; impression (perception) to compression (comprehension) for either expression (growth) or repression (loss). Madonna put it like this..."express yourself; don't repress yourself"..."and I'm not sorry; it's human nature".
What if one can adapt to inspiration which then allows less restricted expression of comprehension? What if others don't need to write for your want of confirmation; but can utilize you as a source of inspiration to adapt to for their own growth of comprehension?
I think there is a name for people like you..I don't want to get banned so I won't say it.
Meanwhile can I say you need to do some serious growing up
Nigger; don't be such a kike and fucking say it instead of being a cunt about it...anyway; does perceivable inspiration require suggested "names" to be perceivable?
On it...growing comprehension by adaption to perceivable inspiration. Btw growing up represents living life; maturity equals death.