by DrLeaks
3
Occams-razor-burn 3 points ago +3 / -0

Why not use nitrogen, CO, or fentanyl?

2
Occams-razor-burn 2 points ago +2 / -0

too many 1%ers go to burning man for this to be true...

2
Occams-razor-burn 2 points ago +2 / -0

As a protestant, I must say Catholicism has done far more for science and philosophy.

However, because it is so rigorously hierarchical it was much easier for them to subvert.

Also, I don't know much about the "2 Lucias" thing, but looking at the photos, it is conceivable that they are the same person imo.

1
Occams-razor-burn 1 point ago +1 / -0

Great post, your genuine concern shows through and sets you apart from all the gloating b.s. riddled posts about vaccine dangers.

I don't have anything to add but these words of encouragement, wish these types of quality posts would become the norm here.

2
Occams-razor-burn 2 points ago +2 / -0

Trump is probably on his own side but he seeks the adoration of the masses as a personal need. That makes him useful to the masses.

1
Occams-razor-burn 1 point ago +2 / -1

This is the one thing that I think refutes the all too common claim that Trump is on "their" side too.

Never, never has the "system" gone to such absurd and transparent lengths to try to "get" someone like this. He is certainly not on their team.

That by no means makes the guy some savior figure like his own cult claims, but it shows the sheer level of hatred the system has when they are not able to control outcomes and crush anyone who challenges it.

2
Occams-razor-burn 2 points ago +2 / -0

I wish they had kept going with that blog.

Well, I'll be damned, they have, just on a very irregular schedule.

2
Occams-razor-burn 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree fully with you. For years my practice of reading news has been to check several sources from every bias group and kind of assume an overall average is the closest to the truth. I.e read the reporting for the same event at NPR, MSNBC, VOX, FOX, WSJ, THE FEDERALIST and so on. If you balance out the bias you at least come close to reality for most normal things.

3
Occams-razor-burn 3 points ago +3 / -0

Interesting theory, and there is definitely some merit to this.

I imagine that there are many people who this would work on. But the best protection from it is actually to practice virtue: those who do not hide their sins or indulge their vices in secret have far less buttons to push this way.

A good dose of cynical skepticism is also a rather impenetrable defense as well. I swear those of my sub-generation (who are the blurred line between Gen X and Millenial who grew up in the earliest days of the consumer internet) are most immune to this and other online scams. When your formative experience with the internet was that it was a wild and anonymous tool but that you NEVER give real personal information and NEVER give full trust to ANYTHING online, then you have a sort of firewall against these schemes.

What I DO see as a potential method of attack that would be far more effective than the extent you say would be for these technologies and data to be used to do things such as break interpersonal relationships by seeding doubts and mistrust... even things as simple as manipulating suggested search results to make it appear a husband or wife was searching porn or hookup apps would be achievable with only cursory data and the ability to manipulate their browser remotely.

It is also already used to manipulate online social groups into echo chambers. Reddit, 4chan, maybe even here already do this with the most pernicious methods being making hidden "shards" (discreet individual virtual servers that separate access to the site) where certain people never see other people's interactions based on whatever tags are assigned to the given user. Threads and homepage results are created procedurally by sampling the entire site and curating which parts of the total data is delivered to any user experience. On 4chan this is often done by generating threads that will continue to be updated until the user makes a comment, at which point it is "killed" (action Al posts are not delivered to that user's shard, or that thread only existed in that shard and was generated to terminate upon interaction.)

These type of subtle (and easily executed) manipulations are designed to break social cohesion and information exchange as well as to psychologically manipulate the user to fell isolated or even to provoke suspic of "reality" (since the users of social media are conditioned to correlate online interactions with IRL interactions as both being equally real despite the obvious fallacy of this). To the conditioned user, if online "reality" seems controlled and fake then they extend that perspective to actual reality and think it is fake also.

I see the results of this often on these places in the utter decline of intelligent discourse in these communities (including this one) and it's replacement with amateur, naive, and absurd ignorance. **A perfect evidence of this is how this community almost ubiquitously uses the word "research" to signify "I googled this thing and read the top results and some other people's opinions about it on forums or YouTube and never consulted a single document or source that exists outside of the controlled and manipulated internet."

3
Occams-razor-burn 3 points ago +3 / -0

Darwin Award

If you are dumb enough to lull yourself based on something a chatbot said, you don't need to be part of the gene pool anyway

3
Occams-razor-burn 3 points ago +3 / -0

Because you cannot into math. You didn't need the picture to tell us you are an idiot.

1
Occams-razor-burn 1 point ago +1 / -0

The whole game is to make people afraid to protest. And if they do protest, to frame them for crimes and delegitimize the protested issue.

It is a "head I win, tails you lose" setup.

1
Occams-razor-burn 1 point ago +1 / -0

I recommend one thing to you, because you seem addled and not sure what to do with your time: spend a month completely sober. Learn how to have fun and be social without alcohol or pot or anything else.

Not saying you, or anyone is even overboard with it, most people have a couple of drinks or smoke or consume something when socializing and doing leisure. And slowly that thing becomes part of the experience, and then you forget you don't need anything else, don't need to buy shit to enjoy time with friends. And then you are another cog.

Take a break. Live life without consuming.

1
Occams-razor-burn 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lead paint was above anything else for preserving exterior wood.

3
Occams-razor-burn 3 points ago +3 / -0

Frankly, I am surprised, would not have guessed Japan for the no. 1 spot.

1
Occams-razor-burn 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wow that is super informative and demonstrates an incredible knowledge of European history.

1
Occams-razor-burn 1 point ago +1 / -0

The White House is not where the power lies, have Trump and Biden's presidencies shown you nothing!?

They will ignore and undermine a duly elected president. They control and puppet a false president they placed into power in defiance of an election...

You really think some antifa goons in the White House or not makes any difference whatsoever beyond the sad fact that they will destroy and deface our national artifacts!?

2
Occams-razor-burn 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't think any of that part is a lie, personally. I think the lie is about just how very dangerous it actually is and what the lasting damage will be. Im not a chemical engineer by any means though.

2
Occams-razor-burn 2 points ago +2 / -0

That is exactly what was said about it back when it happened 2or 3 weeks ago.

The report was that they dug a trench and punctured the tanker and burned it so that the tanker wouldn't explode. There was no control of the fumes, it was burned off to prevent a giant explosion and fumes. I think they claimed that burning the chemicals would be less harmful than if the explosion spread unburnt chemicals everywhere.

That was the narrative given, make of it what you will.

2
Occams-razor-burn 2 points ago +2 / -0

No. It really isn't. There is not one single bit of new information here. Just some dumb bitch portraying other people's research as something she discovered hereself.

2
Occams-razor-burn 2 points ago +2 / -0

Cool, keep me posted.jpg

-2
Occams-razor-burn -2 points ago +1 / -3

This is garbage. It is some random chick with no credentials (I don't believe in credentialism if you have ideas, but no paralegal is getting invited to hear insider top-level secrets).

She is just rattling off a "greatest hits" compilation of government misdeeds as if it were something new.

garbage.

2
Occams-razor-burn 2 points ago +2 / -0

I would actually like you to explain why you do what you do... Is it OCD? Are you a heavy user of psychoactive drugs?

I think we once reconciled my initial suspicion that you were a bot, and looking at your posts, there are enough random errors and unique (to your posts) style that I think you are a human who is monomaniacally obsessed with what it is you are doing.

What is your goal, though?

view more: Next ›