if germ theory is based on a false area of biology, that PROVES without a doubt that TPTB have so much influence that they can literally create FAKE areas of science. fake sciences that some of our brightest dedicate there life too.
its scary to think that someone who society has deemed an expert has no more idea then your average joe. we are taught from the get go, that if we need answers we seek out the advice of experts.
there is no area more prominently effected by this then medicine.
One might find them selves asking a question.. how could this even be? how could our best and brightest simply not know?
the real question you should be asking yourself is not weather this is possible, instead ask yourself what other "sciences" are based on unproven models.
The deeper root of most false science is the fairytale know as the theory of evolution.
a) suggested information (understanding) represents the fairy tale; which tempts one to ignore perceivable inspiration (knowledge) for reasoning (want vs not want) about suggested theories.
b) EVOLU (to unfold; open; expand) -TION (through action)...that represents the status quo of reaction (living) within enacting (dying) aka temporary growth within ongoing loss.
In that regard: science (perceivable reality) or scientism (suggested fiction)...your free will of choice between need (perceivable inspiration) or want (suggested information).
If you choose want over need; then you find yourself within the want vs not want conflict of reason; which those making the suggestions can rebrand into true vs false; good vs bad; believing vs not believing; leftwing vs rightwing; rich vs poor; nationalism vs internationalism; spandex vs leather and so on.
Absolutely. Mauro biglino official channel youtube English subtitles..an Italian Catholic who was employed by Vatican publishers as an expert in old hebrew Greek Latin and others..until he uncovered so much the catholics don't want known. about our beginnings .
There were 13 gan edins ..Adam came from elsewhere and placed in they think one in mesopotamia..then they...the Elohim.... adapted and created animals and fruit and veggies grain..then Eve. It says "from the sleeping body of Adam they take something the term is "rib" but, in reality, it means " side part" this said by rabbi Egael Safran, university professor of medical ethics in Jerusalem "no problem here. The Bible has known about cloning for 4000 years"
Hybrids were made when the Elohim 240 odd ..mainly men..had sex with the adamites...producing nefilim..giants..Nimrod Hercules Gilgamesh etc. The hominids were tinkered with using the blood and semen of young Elohim.
I am staggered at the immense fraud of the religions involved that one of the Elohim.. yahweh..the mass murderering governor of the tribe of Jacob not only set up a money system in Deuteronomy using usury so the Israelites would always dominate the world.. Rothschild federal reserve central banking.......but also circumsion both sexes . .abortion as the Elohim wanted more females and aborted males. Passing the first born through the fire..went on until Josiah 7th century changed it to a ransom. instituted slavery.. the census and using people as a commodity... also the corrupt law systems .
There is far too much evidence even in the bibles they keep altering..again last month new printing of bibles for public..KJ bible Jerusalem Bible etc changed to show Elohim as singular even the Mormon Bible changed to singular with plural Elohim note in the margin.
In kings there is one Elohim king of Samaria. Son of jezebel...fell out of window.. frightened he might die..sent to ask for help from Elohim Baal zebub Elohim of Ekron.
Another Baal Per got turned into a devil because his rituals included sex so people abandoned Yahweh and his wife asherah and for this was punished.
Baal Per became belphegor along with beezlebub...changed to devils from Elohim.
If Jesus is yahweh s only begotten son..contrary to what is in the Bible then Jesus is a hybrid born of a hybrid and fathered by an Elohim.
Mary at 12 was put in Joseph's care in yahweh temple..there since she was three as her mother too old to have a child was visited by a gavri EL and had Mary while her husband was away on business and Mary was promised to the temple at three years of age.
The Bible says Mary was covered by a gavri EL.
The gospel of Peter who was a disciple and wrote that he saw jesus taken down from the cross alive and put in the tomb. Lights in the sky..two men entered the tomb three came out one being supported.
Where is this gospel? Forbidden like many others and the four gospels said to be by four disciples were no such thing and written hundred years later.
Ezekiel describes a chariot he was taken up a mountain in..NASA copied it and PATENTED it. The Mahabharata describes the same space shuttles...
Now we know the name of NASA guy and when ..so do you think that the head of the military Flynn and his brother don't know such a shattering thing..not a god or gods but vicious aliens
Is this why Israel bombed Syria civilian airport last week? They think they have a "divine right" to Syria... yahweh an alien promised it to them
Isn't this all fraud and racketeering?
Mauro biglino the naked bible
Https://youtu.be./DfY2KIKr34
https://youtu.be/WijP_yczjbE
I have just checked and it says that video is not available so this one goes into Elohim root word etc in great depth
I had sent one where so many different Elohim are mentioned in kings and if I find it I will put it on here for you.
https://youtu.be/UcrWgvkTujM. This is a two minute video about gospel of Peter
Too many suggested names within a perceivable system that doesn't brand anything. To many suggested places within a perceivable system placing only within momentum. Too many suggested numbers; when ALL perceivable designates itself through self differentiation into each perceiving "ONE".
Flow (male velocity) to momentum (balance) to form (female resistance). Rib represents enclosed by on both sides; hence form (life) enclosed by flow (inception towards death).
Adaptation implies as reaction (living) to enacted (dying); while suggested creationism (implies out of nothing) tempts one to ignore perceivable transmutation (implies out of everything).
Flow to form (inception); form within flow (life); form to flow (death) represents ingredient living transmuted out of base dying. To tackle creationism...ask yourself if you can create any new thought without shaping it out of already perceivable ingredients? Start smaller...can you create words without shaping them out of letters? Next step..can you create suggestible words without shaping them out of perceivable sound? Finally...can choice "act" when it represents a reaction to perceivable balance (need/want)?
Cloning suggested represents "duplication" aka equality (sameness); which ignores that the perceiving within perceivable can only sense diversity (differences). The origin of the function of cloning (out of the same source) represents the status quo of existence aka each one (growth) within all (loss) cloned from the oneness (energy) of all (growth/loss balance).
In other words...all represents one in energy, so everything within can only be "cloned" from it; which again ties to transmutation out of base.
Ignoring a self differentiating system by mixing the differences back together (e pluribus unum; out of many one aka miscegenation) represents HYB'RID, noun [Gr. injury, force, rape; Latin hybrida.] - "a mongrel produced from mixture".
RELIGON; noun (Latin religio) - "to bind anew"; which represents choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law; the inversion of perceivable balance (enacting) to choice (reacting) natural law.
Anything suggested within religions is being defined (idolatry); redefined (revisionism) and contradicted (talmudic reasoning) by the few making the suggestions towards the consenting many.
Before that comes choice (suggested monetary value) to choice (consent to it) contract law; in ignorance of balance (all value) to choice (ones evaluation) natural law. The highest value within all existence represents ones evaluation thereof. Those who ignore this for suggested values are devaluating themselves.
Based on the many ignoring that form cannot claim anything within flow without attaching themselves to it; while ignoring the need to resist being moved towards death. This is why choice of want represents temptation luring towards death; while choice of need represents responsibility to sustain life by adaptation.
The parasitic few simply claim those who ignore resisting; while tempting them with suggested progressivism to keep going with the flow; to keep wanting what others suggest.
Sorry..didn't understand a word you said. If you are saying there wasn't Adam and Eve or aliens etc ..I think you could argue we are not really here either.
You should get a job with government...you could answer pressing questions without answering any points taking up many pages