if germ theory is based on a false area of biology, that PROVES without a doubt that TPTB have so much influence that they can literally create FAKE areas of science. fake sciences that some of our brightest dedicate there life too.
its scary to think that someone who society has deemed an expert has no more idea then your average joe. we are taught from the get go, that if we need answers we seek out the advice of experts.
there is no area more prominently effected by this then medicine.
One might find them selves asking a question.. how could this even be? how could our best and brightest simply not know?
the real question you should be asking yourself is not weather this is possible, instead ask yourself what other "sciences" are based on unproven models.
Science represents perceivable inspiration for growth of ones comprehension. Scientism represents suggested information to tempt one to understand (stand under) other ones.
a) nature doesn't suggest true or false information; it first differentiates (all perceivable into each one perceiving it); then communicates perceivable inspiration (moving differences) by simply moving everything.
b) true vs false represents a rebrand of wanting vs not wanting suggested information; while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable inspiration.
a) what if the few utilize suggestion to tempt the many to ignore knowledge (perception)?
b) what if choice represents the center of a balance based system? What if each ONE (perceiving) represents the center of ALL (perceivable)?
c) if the few suggest the "best and brightest"; then could that tempt the many to ignore growing themselves while following others?
As temporary form (life) within ongoing flow (inception towards death) aka living within the process of dying, one represents the temporary resistance (growth) within the ongoing velocity (loss).
What if the parasitic few suggest the many to ignore resisting; hence feeding their fleeting resistance as "a contribution to a general loss"?