My quick translation:
French reporter 0-36 seconds: We are here in Sabra refugee camp for Palestinians in Beirut. What we have seen is atrocious. It is not something related to war, what you see is something terrifying. There is no political explanation, it cannot be possibility explained. No, it's the outcome of hate, we cannot even talk about it But we must say it, and we must show it and we must think in spite of it all.
The old man replying to the French reporter says that who killed them were the Phalanges led by the infamous Maronite Saad Haddaad.
The second part I think is just info that is easy to find about Sabra and Shatilla.
Sabra and Shatilla weren't the first nor the last massacre the Palestinians faced. The jewish hordes have committed numerous massacres against the Palestinians to get them out of Palestine. And in Lebanon, the Palestinians faced many massacres on the hands of the Maronites, the Shiites and the Syrians.
The best book on Sabra and Shatila is this one but it's rather large: https://www.amazon.com/Sabra-Shatila-Bayan-Nuwayhed-Al-Hout/dp/0745323030
As terrible as this massacre was, it is even more terrifying to know that after it happened, the remaining survivors were forbidden to talk about it in the camps by the Lebanese authorities. Moreover all the perpetrators became high office politicians who later run the country into the ground without any accountability to the killings.
To this day any Palestinians living in Lebanon are forbidden from work and from even fixing their homes or maintaining it!
From page 63 of the "reference" which you are using as a basis to diss out everything I've written in this post:
According to your credible source: "In Hitler's case, he was sodomized, creating a submissive distant respect for homosexuals like his bodyguards and some of his highest-placed leaders. His natural bent was developed into coprophilia (being shat on).."
If you don't see this "book" for what it is, I do not know what to say.
Regardless what conclusions you come to, if there is any take from this, is that perhaps even if he had relations, it were not the simple infiltrated agent type nor a pathetic puppet one. At the very least, by the end of 1941 Hitler seems to have realized what blunder he got into and I believe he had good intentions but a mistaken ideology.
The date of Hitler meeting the Palestinian Mufti in November of 1941 is to me an important turning point, but by then one could say the Germans had lost the war and fallen into the trap.
The only I know of specifically about funding would be "German Big Business and the Rise of Hitler" by Henry Ashby Turner Jr.
But my point of view is that the zionists jews may have indeed allowed some funding to go through German big business but that it's more complicated than just initial funding and one shouldn't completely throw away what the Germans did in WW2 because of it.
After Hitler took power he had to make creative transactions without money to make things work, another book which glances on this is: Derrota Mundial by Salvador Borrego (It's only in Spanish though) But I think this is basic knowledge. He made deals without money with many countries such as Mexico.
But please consider this which are also facts: There are two types of jews, ones who wanted to assimilate or even control the world without making a national jewish state (those were against Hitler from the beginning hence the boycott in 1933).
And there are the zionists jews who wanted a homeland and to control the world from Palestine (what they later named as so called: israel and which in a way now does control the world).
The zionists jews won, most jews who did go to the camps, who were not that many if I may add, where from the good ethical jews who did not support the zionists jews.
I think the zionists jews also made agreements with Hitler that if he let the rich zionists jews out of Germany they would let him be which they DID! Until they they got out everything out of him then they turned on him.
Lastly, the problem with Nazi ideology is that in a way it is no different than zionisms, or perhaps they tried to emulate it. That's why many Nazi officials respected zionists jews more than non zionists although some of the non zionists jews were more humane and ethical.
Maybe I missed it, but I haven't seen anyone here talk about George Nader (Mini Epstein).
George Nader was in the business of trafficking children to Bin Salman and Bin Zayed, both of which are working for the israelis and have later become clients to Epstein.
George Nader was a Chrisitan Maronite, who have been the minions of the israelis ever since the late 60s. Interestingly the only Church the Maronites have outside of Lebanon is next to jewish synagogues in Brooklyn!
Maronite phalanges are known to their brutality amongst themselves , and the wholesale massacres of Palestinians, many people, especially children have gone missing in Lebanon during the civil war and even now. Especially from Syrian refugees.
George Nader was caught by chance by finding child pedophilia on his mobile, his employers let go of him and didn't get him out.
The video maker says Sutton's book is unreliable as it relies mostly on the book by the pseudo author Sydney Warburg and that Henry Ashby Turner Jr. book: "German Big Business and the Rise of Hitler" is a far more reliable source.
My actual take on this is that Hitler was propped up before the war and he had some relations with English royalty. But he didn't realize that they were going to turn on him, hence he let them go in Dunkirk thinking that he could actually make peace with them.
Our enemies are quite flexible and will support every side to achieve whatever their goals are. And they will change and adapt their plans.
In short, he was not that complete puppet people imagine him to be, instead he was deceived just like Saddam was and if I may add that had things gone differently he could have truly defeated the jews and changed the world for the better, but he had a conflicting (moral/immoral) philosophical base which persists to this day with true white supremacists and was the cause of his downfall.
Saddam was propped up by the English and had relations with them (Jordan, Qatar and Oman are English colonies to this day).
The English told Saddam that it will be okay to invade Kuwait, he didn't understand that they were setting him up to completely destroy Iraq. He only realized it after the Americans occupied Kuwait.
Similarly, Hitler only started to realize that he had been set-up at the end of 1941
It's complicated and I don't want to type too much while probably no one will read but feel free to ask anything.
Man you are sprouting absolute bullshit, and from your post history I can see the mindset you have which is quite deplorable or you might just have an agenda, no one is selling slave children in the middle east. Well maybe jewish israelis do it, but they don't do publicly.
Saudis and Emiratis are most certainly not the best of people (recently they proved that by allying with jewish israelis), and they did have slaves up till the 60s but they were not as common as you falsely claim.
The rules and regulations are not favorable for immigrant workers in those parts but they are not slaves and they cannot be legally beaten!
Abuses do happen and I am the last to defend those Saudi or Emirati cunts, especially the rulers who are in bed with jewish israelis, but everything you wasted your time sprouting is really pure exaggerations.
Man you can't throw your problems onto someone else. The Palestinians are trying to get rid of them and you want to send them jews to Palestine!
BTW before 1900 there were practically no jews in Palestine, jewish hordes took over completely in between 1948-1967.
Those yids could probably only call yidstan/khazaria as their country, somewhere around the pale of settlement Russia/Poland/Ukraine. That's the only place where there were plenty of them. But again now that wouldn't be fair for the Slavs living there and we need to come up with something else. But Palestine is not their place anyhow. And you wouldn't solve anything anyway by giving them a jewish criminal headquarters which they can operate from with impunity.
Thx for the post, enjoyed reading it.
I do not underestimate the computing power of any future computers that might be developed whether quantum or something else they might come up with. But what I mean is that in the end it will do what YOU desire it do and learn what you desire it to learn. It all depends on the parameters you set. It's an extension of your brain. Sure it can jumble up different data you give it and turn out something which feels like it's creative but it's not really creative.
I suppose this is more philosophical than science. It's whether or not you believe there is freewill or the divine or not. If you think humans are automatons then yes, some form of artificial network or huge amount of NAND gates would replace humans. It all boils down to humans trying to be God I suppose.
J.Clark Scott in "But How Do It Know" has a nice couple of pages at the end of his book which you can download here: https://b-ok.asia/book/13492434/677b2b
I stopped trying to explain to people that a computer can't be really "smart" or think for it self, even some programmers fall into AI is the next big thing, AI will be alive, etc...
Yesterday a friend of mine sent me a bunch of AI images which he thought was proof that computers will be better than humans even in art. I pretended to agree, nothing to gain trying to argue that one.
Bruce Charlton and Edward Dutton both have put out an amazing body of work that is hard to find elsewhere. The head-girl personality type was also a revelation to me.
With all likelihood it's too late now, and even if there's still time to flip things around, no one would be willing to go that direction, The Germans were the last ones I think who paid attention to quality over quantity.
We blame the parasites for all the ills we are living through, but if humanity wasn't already too weak we wouldn't have allowed all the banking parasites to rule all over us like they now do.
He is basically saying mouse utopia extinction is not due to over population and lack of socializing, but due to deleterious genetic mutation (dysgenics)
"In sum, in a broad-brush interpretation of the evidence, it looks very much as if England specifically, and all other developed nations to a greater or lesser extent, are recapitulating the Phases of Mouse Utopia – leading towards extinction, or something close to it."
Late to the party here, but my 2 cents.
There were 2 types of jews, jews who wanted a "national homeland" (The one they wanted to steal i.e. Palestine), and the other type were happy back in Germany, UK, US, etc... and didn't want to move anywhere.
When Hitler came to power the jews who didn't care for a homeland were against him (thus the boycott, Judia declares war against Germany in 1933 etc...) BUT the jews who wanted a homeland in Palestine (Mainly Russian ashkenazis) were happy about Hitler and antisemitism in general. It meant more colonist and land thieves could be sent to Palestine, thus why we might see many jewish connections supporting Hitler BEFORE the war.
In a way both zionism and national socialism had the similar concept of blood and soil. zionist saw assimilated jews as traitor jews and called them kikes. Hence some national socialists respected zionist more than assimilated jews.
Hitler seems to have made an agreement with the jews in 1933, by continuing to send jews to Palestine and making immigration easy, the jews would be off his back. But the jews double crossed him as soon as they got all the jews who wanted to supported the zionist project out. They turned on him and the war started in 1939.
An indisputable proof that through the war Hitler didn't work for the jews was the fact that he later trained Palestinians defending their homes against the jewish colonist.
Had Hitler not allowed the jews out, especially the rich and zionists. And simply placed those jews inside German cities. Fire bombings would have never happened on German cities.
Edit: Further discussion on this topic Deana Spingola hosted couple of shows: https://www.goyimtv.tv/v/1045122240/Deanna-Spingola-Hosts-Carolyn-Yeager-vs-Jim-Conduit--Adolf-Hitler-Debate--Oct-12--2022
Video citing some sources: https://www.joshwhotv.com/video/.QG46ww/on-the-accusation-that-hitler-was-financed-revised-version-cut
Michael Collins Piper: https://www.bitchute.com/video/NadL4YNJ7MEd/
Sandwiches!! He was urgently tipped that Sandwiches had arrived from his 5 star hotel in Sharm El Sheikh, so he walked out :D
Shit post I know but actually, it's good news that their dictators such as Al-Sisi are so corrupt that they can't even organize a conference that will give them money.