The Ukraine narrative and the way it is panning out doesn't make very much sense unless you go back to the predictions back in January, where we all knew they would have a big distraction like WW3 to keep people from noticing the vax die offs. They probably don't know the exact timeline for when everyone is going to start dropping like flies (well...like dead flies), so they need something that can escalate at a moments notice. So they are just playing around over there until the death rates start to skyrocket.
Comments (17)
sorted by:
A nuke going off would be a great excuse for all the turbo cancers.
I think it's dangerous for us to assume the jab is about killing everyone who took it or a large number.
Those jews work slowly and incrementally. They are setting up systems for enslavement. I do not think they are rushing to kill everyone just yet.
They are building careful systems of control, slowly changing the demographics, the culture and how every human thinks.
it's about killing them off AND making a profit out of it
hence why pfizer bought trillium (blood cancer) and j&j also bought another company which i forgot now
gotta milk the decaying bodies
> dangerous for us to assume the jab is about killing everyone
no one is assuming anything. the biggest vax pushers also support depop of humanity, independent research has shown there's questionable shit in the vaccines, the actual mortality rate of covid did not come close to justifying a government mandated experimental vaccine, the manufacturers' behavior has been less than transparent, and the covid vaxxes have clear, detrimental effects.
what more does one need to come to the conclusion there is a very good probability the covid vaccines were designed with harmful intent?
I get you, I am not saying we should assume they are "safe" either. BUT.... as a strategy to fight the jewish israelis who are behind this, when we talk to normies or make personal plans etc.. we should be rational and presume the possibility that everything that happened so far was just a test drive for future control.
Everything they did could be just about paving the way for future control.
Or it could be a typical thesis, antithesis synthesis sort of thing. Where they want both sides to fight it out so they can provide solutions.
How far can they push those headlines though, still waiting for an entire sports team to die suddenly of natural causes like sudden adult death syndrome from getting too happy after winning a game
well, it's a slow burn but it's picking up
you can check the case of several public figures, specially the triple vaksd ones and most of them are either with some autoimmune/cancer shit or already collapsed from lungs or heart
my hater denier friends are already getting side effects, my 27yo friend has clinical hypertension, family members had health emergencies already, so, the big deathening is here, it's not as cinematographical as an instant collapse, but that makes it even worse
If they have really planned this out properly, they probably want to avoid having 5 billion people die at once (who would cleanup?), but I think there will be an accelerated rate of vax deaths that will be too obvious to hide. Some of the doctors that researched the vax back in the early days of rollout predicted that it would be between 2 to 5 years. Personally, I think they need to stretch it out between 1 to 10 years. There just wouldn't be enough people around to clean up the bodies if everyone died in a year or two. Then again, maybe they don't care if billions of corpses rot in empty cities. They will all be safe in their fortresses far away from the mayhem.
I work at HR and noone is literally dropping
That's kind of what I mean. If there is going to be a mass culling as a result of the vax, it hasn't happened yet. You'll know it has started when WW3 heats up in order to hide how bad it is.
No. Vax deaths are an incremental statistic, already incorporated into natural causes or other arbitrary underlying conditions, or even COVID.
They're still pushing both to develop agenda where change is being fast paced. Change in the form of energy, and supply lines. Where digital ID seemed to being slipped in under the hood. The disease forced lockdown. Lockdown caused change. Recession. It caused. Apart from speculation the other side to react. Supply lines rerouted.
Both the disease and then the war forwarded their agenda. While seeking to reign control over a World narrative of the climate and disease, forwarding that agenda, of the newer systems forced. They are costly, taxation, infrastructure. Because they supposedly simply had to adapt into that change abruptly instead of it being forced. It attempts like a cauldron of unspeakable brew with all the ingredients added, control. Control where a mad juggler is hoping it doesn't fallout. Control over opposition over population. While singlehandedly forcing agenda.
It's 4d chess. Causation. Reaction. Causation.
But does it fallout? How, at this stage they'd deal peace in 5 seconds later. If any government changes the next simply forces policy through. At this stage it's primed for conflict but it's almost a distraction if it forces agenda. Newer methods forced. Conflict simply controls the narrative. Anything is better than the narrative.
We will save tomorrow by collapsing today. We will be the leaders of the future by changing them every 5 minutes and having no popularity outside of an obnoxious script.
Or what? Think it's pretty much this. Yea why not war. It would be easier than listening to this shit. Because it is simply forcing change. So it drags. Neither side is committed, we'd be directly at it, but instead they blunder into the narrative.
You damn well know that isn’t going to happen, though.
What's your take on it? Just a money grab?
shut up fed