The video maker says Sutton's book is unreliable as it relies mostly on the book by the pseudo author Sydney Warburg and that Henry Ashby Turner Jr. book: "German Big Business and the Rise of Hitler" is a far more reliable source.
My actual take on this is that Hitler was propped up before the war and he had some relations with English royalty. But he didn't realize that they were going to turn on him, hence he let them go in Dunkirk thinking that he could actually make peace with them.
Our enemies are quite flexible and will support every side to achieve whatever their goals are. And they will change and adapt their plans.
In short, he was not that complete puppet people imagine him to be, instead he was deceived just like Saddam was and if I may add that had things gone differently he could have truly defeated the jews and changed the world for the better, but he had a conflicting (moral/immoral) philosophical base which persists to this day with true white supremacists and was the cause of his downfall.
Saddam was propped up by the English and had relations with them (Jordan, Qatar and Oman are English colonies to this day).
The English told Saddam that it will be okay to invade Kuwait, he didn't understand that they were setting him up to completely destroy Iraq. He only realized it after the Americans occupied Kuwait.
Similarly, Hitler only started to realize that he had been set-up at the end of 1941
It's complicated and I don't want to type too much while probably no one will read but feel free to ask anything.
From page 63 of the "reference" which you are using as a basis to diss out everything I've written in this post:
According to your credible source: "In Hitler's case, he was sodomized, creating a submissive distant respect for homosexuals like his bodyguards and some of his highest-placed leaders. His natural bent was developed into coprophilia (being shat on).."
If you don't see this "book" for what it is, I do not know what to say.
The video maker says Sutton's book is unreliable as it relies mostly on the book by the pseudo author Sydney Warburg and that Henry Ashby Turner Jr. book: "German Big Business and the Rise of Hitler" is a far more reliable source.
My actual take on this is that Hitler was propped up before the war and he had some relations with English royalty. But he didn't realize that they were going to turn on him, hence he let them go in Dunkirk thinking that he could actually make peace with them.
Our enemies are quite flexible and will support every side to achieve whatever their goals are. And they will change and adapt their plans.
In short, he was not that complete puppet people imagine him to be, instead he was deceived just like Saddam was and if I may add that had things gone differently he could have truly defeated the jews and changed the world for the better, but he had a conflicting (moral/immoral) philosophical base which persists to this day with true white supremacists and was the cause of his downfall.
Saddam was propped up by the English and had relations with them (Jordan, Qatar and Oman are English colonies to this day).
The English told Saddam that it will be okay to invade Kuwait, he didn't understand that they were setting him up to completely destroy Iraq. He only realized it after the Americans occupied Kuwait.
Similarly, Hitler only started to realize that he had been set-up at the end of 1941
It's complicated and I don't want to type too much while probably no one will read but feel free to ask anything.
Pkease give us relevant reading material that expose this point of view. Funding of the third reich
Hitler. Hero of every dumb drugged up suburban couch potato.
British agent.
http://library.lol/main/9B9B8C52CBE79D66A3F97C98836846ED
From page 63 of the "reference" which you are using as a basis to diss out everything I've written in this post:
According to your credible source: "In Hitler's case, he was sodomized, creating a submissive distant respect for homosexuals like his bodyguards and some of his highest-placed leaders. His natural bent was developed into coprophilia (being shat on).."
If you don't see this "book" for what it is, I do not know what to say.
Hitler and the gang were gay. So what else is new.