No, I got that information from what you wrote and also from reading one of the websites you linked regarding a need for editing. The reason I am asking for more information is because the whole thing is put together terribly and thus would like to know if this is even worth working on.
As for whether or not it's controversial that this person collaborated with Lin Wood, we need background information, context, and maybe even a little nuance. This whole thing could just be a way to discredit Lin Wood, so we need to see the evidence.
This is the most important political issue of our time!
Thanks. All I can gather is some person who goes by various names and claims to have lots of university degrees that the schools themselves repudiate had a talk with some person who supposedly worked for Lin Wood and said all kinds of wild things, but it is unclear if this transcript in any way reflects what was said and the PDF has encoding errors and possibly even malicious code.
A buttocks enlarging device?
Is she one of the three Clinton donors that were on the jury?
Thanks. Who is Ryan Dark White/John/Jon McGreevey? What is the transcript of? Who is the interviewer? Is there a recording of the interview? Is it credible? Can this person be questioned further?
Are we talking about using a PDF editing tool to look for errors or malicious tampering? Are we proof reading and adding punctuation and capitalizations?
Regardless, I have to wait outside of a school door for someone to come open it because if someone props the door open, a silent alarm automatically notifies the police who immediately show up. That is a normal security practice where I live.
That is for unjust laws. There is nothing unjust about punishing people who illegally tamper with democracy.
A large number of accounts appear to be agents provocateur.
If they're going to travel all across America to do it in person, of course they'll have people sit at a keyboard. Wake up people.
This is incredibly important. There is a short video clip at the link which explains this.
Could we get some background on this? Is there an original video? All I got was a reading of a transcript. Who are these people? What sort of testimony is this?
Also, what are the editing needs? There is something about a "broken" PDF file.
What's the conspiracy?
Because things can only have one reason. Buffoon.
Source in Ukrainian:
Із публічних бібліотек треба буде вилучити понад 100 млн пропагандистських книжок, зокрема й російську класику – директорка УІК https://interfax.com.ua/news/general/834171.html
Correlation is not causation.
...how about investing in doors equipped with safety features that prevent the doors from being propped open with no one present?
I visit a school that has exactly this.
I disagree; the whole point of today's media is to shape public opinion.
At 01:18, if you check the actual tweet, the time stamp is 9:19 PM, not 2:19 PM.
https://twitter.com/JENNIFERHousem2/status/1525556450784944129
So, let me get this straight. "Avpr1a is understood to regulate things like teamwork and friendship as well as dominance and bonding," so they removed it "with the expectation it would increase bonding and co-operation between the lovable little critters."
I'll bet they--just like everybody else--expected bonding and cooperation to decrease.
I personally think it was vote counting--assembling caches of Biden votes and scanning them multiple times.
Machines were used to cheat in the 2016 Democratic and Republican primaries. Fractional voting was used to rob Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump of votes. The evidence is a trendline when the precincts are sorted by number of voters.
Maybe this is performance art. Listen closely at the end and the man says it's not real.
Sounds a lot like “trust the plan” to me.
No, this has nothing to do with any sort of plan to trust.
What I mentioned was comprehensive. No need for silly saline.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-Elr5K2Vuo