No, I got that information from what you wrote and also from reading one of the websites you linked regarding a need for editing. The reason I am asking for more information is because the whole thing is put together terribly and thus would like to know if this is even worth working on.
As for whether or not it's controversial that this person collaborated with Lin Wood, we need background information, context, and maybe even a little nuance. This whole thing could just be a way to discredit Lin Wood, so we need to see the evidence.
The Stew Peters video looks more like he's trying defend his decision to publish the information. I watched the first six minutes. Am I correct in interpreting that Stew Peters initially took down the first episode about this person because it seemed fake?
Thanks for all your work. In your view, has any part of it been corroborated?
I don't know about Stew Peters. I think McGreevey is perfectly honest and very well-informed, yes. I have noted lots of corroboration, but not tried to document it. Info I regard as well-corroborated and reliable is published to my Cyberthal blog, existential threads partially excepted.
We need to question everything he says with who, what, when, where, why and how. He have to think critically, get him to name names and vigilantly seek out contradictions.
No, I got that information from what you wrote and also from reading one of the websites you linked regarding a need for editing. The reason I am asking for more information is because the whole thing is put together terribly and thus would like to know if this is even worth working on.
As for whether or not it's controversial that this person collaborated with Lin Wood, we need background information, context, and maybe even a little nuance. This whole thing could just be a way to discredit Lin Wood, so we need to see the evidence.
from Home page | johnheretohelp.info
7/20/21 Lin Wood Backs Whistleblower Johnheretohelp, Addresses Deep State Attacks, Election, Trump, Jabs and More | Rumble
Endorsement starts at 1:00.
Recovered threads from @Johnheretohelp's banned Twitter account.
Downloaded two transcripts! Nice.
The Stew Peters video looks more like he's trying defend his decision to publish the information. I watched the first six minutes. Am I correct in interpreting that Stew Peters initially took down the first episode about this person because it seemed fake?
Thanks for all your work. In your view, has any part of it been corroborated?
I don't know about Stew Peters. I think McGreevey is perfectly honest and very well-informed, yes. I have noted lots of corroboration, but not tried to document it. Info I regard as well-corroborated and reliable is published to my Cyberthal blog, existential threads partially excepted.
We need to question everything he says with who, what, when, where, why and how. He have to think critically, get him to name names and vigilantly seek out contradictions.